Thursday, June 02, 2005

Ex-Ex-Recall? Looks Like It

Y'know, I could just swear I heard somebody from CRC say they didn't want to recall the school board. Yes, it comes back to me now. Back when their URL was, I heard one of their members tell the school board, to their face, something like, "We don't want to recall you, that's just the name of the web site." As I remember, at least one school board member laughed out loud at that one. And I remember reading it in The Gazette, a long time ago, somebody saying, "I do not wish to recall the school board. I know a number of them, and they are in a very difficult position."

And then you remember the big hubbub, when they got the "new" web site, and said, see, we don't want to recall the school board, we've got a different name now. And thus they became the Ex-Recall group.

And then the Recall group split off again, and re-opened the Recall site (but it was never the same). So there were two, Recall and Ex-Recall, and Ex-Recall, now calling themselves CRC, swore they didn't have anything to do with those guys who wanted to recall the school board.

Totally separate, they said. We love the school board, we don't want to recall them.

So you wonder why their secretary is still using the Recall email address. If you go to the Recall bulletin board, you'll see a posting dated May 19th, 2005 -- just two weeks ago -- attributed to:
Theresa Rickman

People wonder, is CRC the same as, or do they just overlap?

Like, I wonder if somebody sent email to, using some different names of people who have said they don't want to recall the school board... would that email bounce back? Or are they still, quietly, maintaining the Recall identity? Please, don't do it, I was just wondering. You know what the answer is.


Blogger Kay2898 said...

You mean like the below:

Interesting...I bet after today the email addresses just might change.

And I thought they said they did not want to "recall the school board." Imagine that one not being entirely true in their own email addresses as it appears through Rickman's.

What are the odd of hers being the only one? Pretty slim I would say.

Kay R

June 02, 2005 6:04 PM  
Blogger andrear said...

Jim, No, no, these are just the only e:mail addresses they could get- nothing else was available- it doesn't mean what it says. You are so suspicious of those fine people. I know if the Ex-Recall- or actually current Recall- by their e:mail addresses- say something it is true- such as how they had no idea the hateful, homophobic filth that would be spewed by their speakers at the "town hall" meeting or that there was no lawsuit planned or how they had no representation on the CAC. Lies are Truth-they must all read Orwell's 1984- or is that on the PABBIS list?

June 02, 2005 6:38 PM  
Blogger Theresa said...

theresa.rickman@recallmontgomeryschoolboard still works.

Of course it does :-)

Email me if you would like.
There are several public statements on our Recall to CRC evolution - the fact that at a local citizens group meeting we determined that we had both a local accountant, a local lawyer, several local PTA members, several local senior sales persons/marketing executives, a local professional meeting planner (who organized our town hall), three local web master saavy folks... as well as 15 subcommittees with leaders...And WE ARE ALL LOCAL PARENTS.....

You argue about outside influence all you want Jim - I have lived in this house in MC since I was 5 years old. I bought it from my parents at 30. I am sorry, explain to me how you get more local than that ?

and we are still going strong here Jim....
I am violating protocol by posting on your site... but that was you intent, wasn't it ?

June 02, 2005 11:54 PM  
Blogger JimK said...

Violating protocol? What, Liberty Counsel told you not to post at TTF blog? Good move, very clever, don't say anything and you won't say anything wrong.

June 03, 2005 7:02 AM  
Blogger andrear said...

Are you sure you want to use that word "evolution"?- I am quite sure that will be the next move for your "local" parents group - after we get real health ed back into the schools and health ed classes that our kids actually attend.


June 03, 2005 7:46 AM  
Blogger JimK said...

Theresa, below, in the "on balance" post, I note that CRC is a local group, but PFOX and LC certainly aren't. And while you may be technically right to say that you are "parents," you do not seem to be mostly parents of MCPS students. So when Steve Fisher says stuff like "We encourage their input, but when it comes down to it, the parents should have the final decision," well, it is a little misleading.

Is he saying that anyone who has ever had a child (or I assume, adopted one) should have the right to decide what is taught in the schools? Clearly, by hisuse of the first person, he does not mean that the parents of the students in the classes should decide. His kids to go private school, and besides, the rest of you will opt your kids out of the health class anyway. So it is not clear what you guys mean when you use the word "parents."

June 03, 2005 9:03 AM  
Blogger Kay2898 said...

Seem the infamous Recall (CRC) message board (THE ORIGINAL RECALL SITE)

that outed Recall members with email addresses like below:

is now noting the following:
"This board has been taken offline"

Kay R

June 07, 2005 3:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kay says: Waaaaa! Waaaaa!

June 08, 2005 7:47 AM  
Blogger Kay2898 said...

Recall said it very well on their message board with exposed email addresses like:

I guess pulling the message board was all they had left to do since they pretended they had nothing to do with that board....BUT....

Lo and behold...another Recall fib.

How is that for Waa...Waa....?

Kay R

June 08, 2005 6:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home