Thursday, June 16, 2011

Note From France

We are in the town of Calais, France, today, on the North Sea (or the English Channel, depending on your point of view). In World War II the Allied forces attacked here to draw German forces away from Normandy, which is nearby, so we could mount an all-out assault on D-Day. It's cold here, we just went through the town looking for a sweatshirt or something, but no luck.

I will be speaking today at a summer academic program for graduate students and professors who do research in evolutionary computation. My first two talks in Cergy went well -- the second was given at eight forty five in the morning after a conference banquet at a chateau that went on until one in the morning and involved sampling many kinds of wine, so I'd have the say the audience was a little sleepy, but the questions were good and I think it went well. Yesterday we took a train from Cergy back into Paris and from there another hour and a half out to Calais -- it was a long day of traveling.

You may have never heard of evolutionary computing. Sometimes engineers and scientists have problems that are too hard to solve by ordinary mathematical methods. There might be a large number of variables, or there might be a lot of "pretty good but not best" solutions, there might be ways that you seem to be improving your situation but are actually making it worse, well there are lots of things that can make a problem hard.

It turns out that one of the best ways to solve these complex problems is through Darwinian evolution. There are three techniques that are most frequently used in an evolutionary computer program: mutation, crossover, and selection.

You begin by defining a random bunch of guesses at the problem solution. These are just values of variables that can be entered into a formula or tested somehow -- the result of that evaluation is called their "fitness." There are many varieties of evolutionary computation, but all of them include selection, that is, you keep the solutions with the highest fitness, allowing them to reproduce, and throw away the worse ones. This is exactly the "survival of the fittest" that drives natural evolution. Typically you might create a new generation of potential problem solutions by mutating these selected ones, randomly changing some of the values, and you might also use crossover, which is the analog of sexual genetic combination, to combine values from selected "parent" problem solutions. Then you evaluate the new population, select the best, apply mutation and crossover, and go again. Over time the quality of the situations gets better, until you have a solution that meets your requirements. This kind of program is used for everything from searching for new pharmeceutical molecules to analyzing financial data to designing nozzles for diesel engines (I talked to a German guy at the chateau the other night who does that, he and I killed a few bottles of wine while we talked), to any kind of hard problem you can think of.

So today I will speak to a group of EC researchers. I will talk about the power of social interaction for problem solving. I will talk about computer programs that simulate groups of people talking among themselves, trying to figure something out, where everyone is simultaneously a learner and a teacher and over time the population comes to a way of solving the problem. In an evolutionary computation program the population dies out and is replaced by new individuals, in my social optimization programs the individuals persist over time, working together to find solutions to hard problems -- this, too, has been used in many fields, from water runoff engineering to optimizing the media for growing bacteria for research to finding new cures for cancer, there are thousands of applications.

Most of Calais was destroyed in World War II, so the whole town is new, but I'd have to say it was not reconstructed carefully. Everything has a kind of falling-apart feel to it, buildings are poorly made. Last night our shower had no hot water, I mean none, there was a trickle of chilly fluid from the shower-head and that's it. But this morning it came on hot, of course the temperature leaps unpredictably from steaming to freezing but it was possible to shower, at least. Karaoke seems to be a twenty-four-hour-a-day diversion here, and by "Karaoke" I mean "really loud, bad Karaoke" with the doors and windows open. I thought "Feelings" was kind of a bad song when it first came out, but I have now heard the world-record bad version of it, while hoping to fall asleep.

We have now traveled all the way across France by train, from Switzerland to the North Sea. It is a beautiful country. In the Alps we saw smaller family farms but across the country you see acres and acres of agriculture -- there is even a lot of corn here. You pass scattered villages with their red roofs, chateaus and old towers, spacious mansions and tiny farmhouses that are hundreds of years old. Here in Calais the tower downtown was built in the 1300s, can you imagine that? In Annecy I asked my friend, "What is that castle called?" and he shrugged and said, "I don't know, just a castle." The people here have been friendly and helpful, you see a few who seem to feel we should have learned their language before we visited but most of the young people are happy to practice their English a little bit. And the food, wow.

I'm sure Vigilance readers will want to argue among themselves about whether gay people should be treated like there's something wrong with them, and Congressman Weiner's dilemma will go through more chapters during the week. Michelle Bachmann continues to amaze, and New York is moving toward freedom for people to marry without government approval of their sexual orientation. I just wanted to check in from the road. Good Internet connection here, it's not a given everywhere, I will check in when I can.

27 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

hopefully they'll let Jim back in when it's over, over there

ALBANY, June 15 (Reuters) - The New York state Assembly approved same-sex marriage on Wednesday and the bill is likely to face a vote in the Senate on Friday, where it only needs support from one more senator to pass, unless someone changes their mind.

The Democrat-dominated Assembly voted 80 to 63 in favor of the marriage equality bill introduced by Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat in his first year in office.

The state-by-state battle over gay marriage has become one of the most contentious U.S. social issues ahead of the 2012 presidential and congressional elections.

"Only second-class states have second-class citizens," said Assemblyman Charles Lavine, a Democrat who voted in favor of legalizing gay marriage.

Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage.

No states' voters have approved the redefinition of marriage.

June 16, 2011 8:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So today I will speak to a group of EC researchers. I will talk about the power of social interaction for problem solving. I will talk about computer programs that simulate groups of people talking among themselves, trying to figure something out, where everyone is simultaneously a learner and a teacher and over time the population comes to a way of solving the problem."

when you think about it, this blog is a perfect example of this

TTFers come posting a bunch of stupid gay agenda or other liberal crap and I disabuse them

they eventually realize how ludicrous there comment are, problem solved

they go away with an enlightened perspective

"I thought "Feelings" was kind of a bad song when it first came out, but I have now heard the world-record bad version of it, while hoping to fall asleep."

what a hipster!

"And the food, wow."

glad to hear you're not still worrying about eating healthy

we all die eventually, but not all of us get to eat our way across France

"I'm sure Vigilance readers will want to argue among themselves"

don't worry, I've pretty much shut 'em up until you get back

June 16, 2011 9:16 AM  
Anonymous where have all the flowers gone? said...

looks like we have an impeachment case coming:

"WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House is vigorously defending President Barack Obama's right to keep the U.S. military engaged in Libya without seeking congressional approval, a move that appears to have done little to soothe anger among Republican lawmakers and anti-war Democrats over the president's consultations with Congress during the nearly three month-long campaign.

Administration officials argue that because the U.S. is in a supporting role in the NATO-led bombing mission, American forces are not facing the "hostilities" that would require the president to seek congressional approval under the War Powers Resolution. That 1973 law prohibits the military from being involved in actions for more than 60 days without congressional authorization, plus a 30-day extension.

The cost of U.S. military operations was about $715 million as of June 3, with the total increasing to $1.1 billion by early September. Lawmakers have been critical of Obama's dealings with Congress throughout the Libya campaign.

"I'm sure Sen. Barack Obama would have disagreed if he were serving at this time," said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said he was amazed that the administration did not believe U.S. forces were facing "hostilities" in Libya, saying generals have told lawmakers otherwise in classified briefings.

"The way the administration handled this entire affair left people on both sides of the aisle very perplexed," said Corker, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Adding to the congressional pressure on Obama, a bipartisan group of 10 lawmakers on Wednesday sued the president for taking military action against Libya without war authorization from Congress. The lawmakers said Obama violated the Constitution in bypassing Congress and using international organizations like the United Nations and NATO to authorize military force.

While Obama did not seek congressional consent before ordering U.S. airstrikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces nearly three months ago, the White House maintained that the president is not in violation of the War Powers Resolution. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, warned Obama this week that the 90-day window runs out Sunday."

June 16, 2011 9:27 AM  
Anonymous bye bye Bama said...

WASHINGTON - As he weighed a presidential run back in 2006, President Barack Obama displayed a realistic sense of self-awareness: All the adulation he was receiving, he conceded then, was because he was a blank slate on which people could attach their aspirations.

As he seeks re-election, his self-awareness is on display again, with a new conclusion.

"It's not as cool to be an Obama supporter as it was in 2008," he acknowledged in Miami this week.

It's a line that holds an important truth for the Obama campaign: Obama is now a known quantity and he will not inspire voters this election the same way he did in the previous one.

Complicating things for Obama is what the Pew Research Center calls an "intensity gap" between Obama's conservative opponents and the liberals who would be most likely to support him. A recent Pew survey found that 85 percent of staunch conservatives strongly disapprove of the president, but only 62 percent of solid liberals strongly approve of him.

Intensity, or enthusiasm, is an important factor in driving voters to the polls. Obama benefited greatly from it in 2008 with a record-shattering turnout. But conservative intensity played a significant role in the 2010 midterm elections that put Republicans in control of the House.

June 16, 2011 9:54 AM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

All you do at Vigilance, Anon, is bore everyone to death posting news stories that we all see anyway or posting your insults and lies that perfectly demonstrate the weaknesses of your views.

You seem to have missed reporting to us the findings of the latest WSJ/NBC poll. Maybe you've been too busy fantasizing about *winning!* GOP presidential tickets featuring women and minorities to notice that poll. Of course Murdock had them bury this paragraph about the poll findings a dozen paragraphs from the top:

"...Among all poll respondents, 45% said they would probably vote to re-elect Mr. Obama, while 40% said they would choose a Republican. Against specific GOP contenders, the president's lead widened. Mr. Obama leads Mr. Romney 49% to 43%; he topped Mr. Pawlenty 50% to 37%..."

Oh and please be sure to encourage your GOP pals in Congress to impeach the President, who leads virtually in every poll against every GOP contender. Impeachment worked so well for the Democrats the last time the GOP pulled that stunt.

June 16, 2011 10:28 AM  
Anonymous svelte_brunette said...

Sounds like a great trip Jim! Any chance of seeing your presentations? (I played around with some “DNA computing” back in the mid-nineties – programmed a simple
Don Quixote claimed:

“TTFers come posting a bunch of stupid gay agenda or other liberal crap and I disabuse them”

Actually Anon, the word you were looking for near the end of that sentence would be “abuse.”

“they eventually realize how ludicrous there comment are, problem solved”

Actually, I only make ludicrous comments in an effort to mirror the lunacy of your own. Most people make the obvious connection, but somehow it always seems to elude you.

“they go away with an enlightened perspective”

Indeed, I never imagined that self-loathing people with same-sex attractions could be so obsessive-compulsive in their anti-gay behavior. It explains a lot though – why we see another prominent anti-gay preacher, ex-gay founder, or anti-gay activist getting caught every 6 to 8 months with some type of gay behavior, and the frustration level they must face is probably humongous.

I mean, they say that the average guy thinks about sex every 7 seconds. For those trying to stay heterosexual, that must be a terrible nightmare, because every 7seconds they’re trying to stop themselves thinking about having sex with a guy because you know, that would be an “abomination.” So they have to force themselves to think about heterosexual sex, and they may even get into a heterosexual marriage. But that must be terribly unfulfilling, given that they can’t really make the kind of intimate connection they really desire.

In this context it’s easy to see why they are so obsessive compulsive. The average straight guy when confronted with the though of “gay sex” will think “Ewww, gross!” and then be on to a happier heterosexual thought no more than seven seconds later. The repressed anti-homosexual activist though, is confronted by his own unwanted desires in another 7 seconds, unable to escape from it. It’s no doubt why you hear more about gay sex from one of these guys in a week than you do from any 6 gay couples put together in a year.

Have a wonderful day,

Cynthia

June 16, 2011 10:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Impeachment worked so well for the Democrats the last time the GOP pulled that stunt."

you think that was a plus for Clinton?

could you elaborate because I remember that the Dems lost in the next Presidential election to the son of the guy Clinton beat to get elected?

and that guy was re-elected in 2004

I think that was a repudiation of the Clinton sleaze

btw, here's a travesty of intolerance unfolding today that should concern the entire GLBTE community

if they can get away with forcing an exhibitionist out of office, where will it stop

next they'll be going after Gs and Ls and Bs and Ts

the forces of intolerance won't stop at Es

and the rainbow fades to black and white:

"Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) has told his friends he is prepared to resign from Congress, the New York Times reports.

A Democratic source tells HuffPost's Sam Stein that Weiner called Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), who chairs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday night to alert them of his plans to step down today.

A Democratic source tells HuffPost's Mike McAuliff, "At least the nightmare is over."

In recent weeks, the embattled congressman has resisted calls to resign from his post amid intense controversy surrounding inappropriate interactions he admitted to engaging in online and lewd photos surfacing of the congressman.

The scandal got even stranger Wednesday, when a former porn actress who exchanged emails and messages with Weiner said he asked her to lie about their interactions.
Weiner has acknowledged sending sexually explicit messages and suggestive photos of himself to various women and then lying about it. The New York congressman has taken a two-week leave from the House and is reported to be in treatment for an undisclosed condition at an undisclosed location."

if only would stand up for his rights and run for re-election!!

then, we might all be free to be you and me

June 16, 2011 11:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I only make ludicrous comments in an effort to mirror the lunacy of your own. Most people make the obvious connection, but somehow it always seems to elude you."

you're right that did elude me

we'll keep it in mind, however, next time you make a comment

"Indeed, I never imagined that self-loathing people with same-sex attractions could be so obsessive-compulsive in their anti-gay behavior."

never imagined, huh?

yet, you've been saying it for years ever since you read it somewhere

and, amazingly, it's still a figment of your imagination

"I mean, they say that the average guy thinks about sex every 7 seconds."

well, regardless of what "they" say, can you attest that this is true or is this idea what convinced you that you weren't an average guy?

btw, you seem to know "they" pretty well

what do "they" say about how often females think of sex?

June 16, 2011 11:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gotta love that Murdock spin:

45% of poll respondents "would probably vote" for Obama but 40% of poll respondents "would choose a Republican."

That is misleading reporting by the WSJ, trying to make Democrats appear unsure while trying to make Republicans appear certain, which is totally false spin.

Following Aunt Bea's link to the WSJ article and its link to the poll itself, shows that Q8 was worded:

"If President Obama runs for reelection in the year 2012, do you think you will probably vote for President Obama or probably vote for the Republican candidate?"

June 16, 2011 11:15 AM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

you think that was a plus for Clinton?

could you elaborate


Since you asked so nicely, I will elaborate how talk of impeachment around the 1998 midterm election helped Clinton with this graph by Gallup of Clinton's approval ratings over time, which breaks out Clinton approval ratings by Party Affiliation. Look at the lines plotted for Democrats and Independents from 1998-2001 to clearly see what benefit impeachment brought to Clinton's approval ratings. Notice that even Republicans approved of him slightly more after the 1998 midterms than they had before 1997.

I will elaborate how impeachment was a plus for Democrats with this passage from Wikipedia:

"The 1998 midterm campaign was marked by Republican attacks on the morality of President Clinton, with Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr having released his report on the Lewinsky scandal and House leaders having initiated an inquiry into whether impeachable offenses had occurred. However, exit polls indicated that most voters opposed impeaching Clinton, and predictions of high Republican or low Democratic turnout due to the scandal failed to materialize. Some speculate that the losses reflected a backlash against the Republicans for attacking the popular Clinton. With the GOP having lost 5 House seats and failing to gain any seats in the Senate, it was the first time since 1934 that the non-presidential party failed to gain congressional seats in a mid-term election. It was also the first time since 1822 that the non-presidential party had failed to gain seats in the mid-term election of a President's second term. In addition, the resulting balance of seats, 223 to 211, was the slimmest majority held by either party since 1952."

June 16, 2011 12:03 PM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

The truth about the economy, a video by Robert Reich.

We need a strong middle class to get America back on track.

June 16, 2011 12:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

o-me-gorsh

Bea thinks the whole Lewinsky affair was a big boost for Clinton

interesting those approval ratings didn't get Gore elected

you may remember that Gore shunned Clinton during the campaign because Clinton was so tarnished

and could you now elaborate about the current violation of the law by the worst president we've ever had?

do you think he should be allowed to blow things up for more than ninety days without Congressional permission?

that's the law now

you think it's unconstitutional?

"Gotta love that Murdock spin:

45% of poll respondents "would probably vote" for Obama but 40% of poll respondents "would choose a Republican.""

actually, the important point is that this poll was covering the whole public not likely voters

Obama's supporters are low-lifes unlikely to show up at the polls

Complicating things for Obama is what the Pew Research Center calls an "intensity gap" between Obama's conservative opponents and the liberals who would be most likely to support him. A recent Pew survey found that 85 percent of staunch conservatives strongly disapprove of the president, but only 62 percent of solid liberals strongly approve of him.

June 16, 2011 1:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rachel Maddow must be beside herself with rage!

"WASHINGTON – Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) announced at a press conference Thursday that he is resigning from Congress, making him the first congressman whose career was wrecked by indiscretions on Twitter.

Weiner, who mistakenly tweeted a photo of his underwear-clad erection last month and then lied to cover it up, had been under escalating pressure to quit as one embarrassing revelation after another came to light.

Congressional leaders had been slated to meet Thursday to hash out a strategy regarding Weiner's fate. Most of the House leadership had already called for his resignation, and President Obama made a similar suggestion.

Weiner's wife, Huma Abedin, returned from a weeklong trip to Africa with her boss, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Also on Wednesday, former porn actress Ginger Lee, who had exchanged emails and messages with Weiner, held a bizarre press conference in which she claimed he had urged her to lie about their communication.

The congressman had already announced he would be taking a two-week leave from the House for rehab. The combination of family pressure and personal embarrassment apparently became too big a hurdle to overcome. It was recently reported that Abedin is pregnant with the pair's first child.

“At least the nightmare is over,” one source close to Weiner said.

Another told The Huffington Post that Weiner called Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) Wednesday, informing him of his plans.

Observers noted the decision had to have been extremely hard for Weiner, who defiantly resisted pressure to resign for several weeks, and that the call to Israel came the day Abedin got home.

“Wife comes home and he picks ‘us’ over ‘me’ –- but I'd take away his belt and his shoelaces, just in case,” said Baruch College political scientist Doug Muzzio.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who had been among those trying to push Weiner out, declined to discuss his case at her weekly news conference, suggesting it was just her regular update -- a statement met with chuckles from reporters who at first thought she was joking.

But she was not.

"if you're here to ask questions about Congressman Weiner, I won't be answering any," Pelosi said."

June 16, 2011 2:50 PM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

Bea thinks the whole Lewinsky affair was a big boost for Clinton

Your compulsive lying is as boring as your compulsive gay bashing, Anon.

I said nothing about "the whole Lewinsky affair." What I said is "Oh and please be sure to encourage your GOP pals in Congress to impeach the President, who leads virtually in every poll against every GOP contender. Impeachment worked so well for the Democrats the last time the GOP pulled that stunt."

interesting those approval ratings didn't get Gore elected

you may remember that Gore shunned Clinton


Well duh, Anon. Al Gore was not and is not Bill Clinton, is he? Perhaps had Gore campaigned with Clinton back in 1999 and 2000, he would have beaten George W, but we'll never know now, will we?

could you now elaborate about the current violation of the law by the worst president we've ever had?

Certainly! Years ago President-Elect Obama announced he would not investigate and prosecute the worst President we ever had, George W. Bush, who decided to pretend waterboarding is not torture and so allowed his administration to violate US laws that outlaw the use of torture, clearly a crime. Why did Obama make this decision? He stated his “belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards” and not be distracted from the pressing needs of American citizens: jobs.

How many jobs will the GOP create with an attempt to impeach Obama? Not a single one.

How much tax-payer money will the GOP waste on this attack against Obama? I can't say for sure but there'll be many more dollars spent than the number of jobs they'll create, that much is certain.

June 16, 2011 3:07 PM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

Weiner has resigned for breaking no laws.

When will Vitter resign for his repeated crimes of hiring prostitutes in LA and DC?

June 16, 2011 3:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Your compulsive lying is as boring as your compulsive gay bashing, Anon.

I said nothing about "the whole Lewinsky affair."

actually, you brought up his approval ratings to "prove" that the repubs made a big mistake in impeaching him

they actually did their duty

Clinton lied under oath and should have been removed from office

actually, taking advantage of an subordinate just out of college was creepy enough to remove him

"Well duh, Anon. Al Gore was not and is not Bill Clinton, is he? Perhaps had Gore campaigned with Clinton back in 1999 and 2000, he would have beaten George W, but we'll never know now, will we?"

well, the significant fact is not what might have been but that the Democratic nominee for President would distance himself from the impeached incumbent- tells you all you need to know

"Certainly! Years ago President-Elect Obama announced he would not investigate and prosecute the worst President we ever had, George W. Bush, who decided to pretend waterboarding is not torture and so allowed his administration to violate US laws that outlaw the use of torture, clearly a crime."

not too many years ago- he's only been in office 2.5 years and he dithered quite a bit before backing down on that

"Why did Obama make this decision? He stated his “belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards”"

that might make some sense in Bush's case but Obama is currently breaking the law

"and not be distracted from the pressing needs of American citizens: jobs."

I'm thinking spending that money on domestic needs would do more for the jobs picture

not only that, but removing Obama before January 2013 would do wonders for our economy

"How many jobs will the GOP create with an attempt to impeach Obama? Not a single one."

see above

"How much tax-payer money will the GOP waste on this attack against Obama? I can't say for sure but there'll be many more dollars spent than the number of jobs they'll create, that much is certain."

oh, that's not certain at all

it's will be less than Obama has spent increasing the government-paid limo fleet and flying himself to exotic locations

"Weiner has resigned for breaking no laws."

that's because he was an embarassment- GLBTEs shouldn't be in government, they are security risks

"When will Vitter resign for his repeated crimes of hiring prostitutes in LA and DC?"

probably never since his constituents re-elected him

June 16, 2011 3:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey, when the blazes is Barney Frank resigning?

June 16, 2011 3:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

probably never since his constituents re-elected him

June 16, 2011 4:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Vitter wasn't running a prostitution service out of his Capitol Hill townhouse nor did he engage in illicit homosexuality

not to mention, destroy our economy

June 16, 2011 4:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"illicit homosexuality"? Get with it, nutty "Anonymous"

Seems like prostitution is illicit, except maybe in Nevada,but not where Sen. Vitter carried on his sacrosanct, hypocritical Marriage-is-sacred activities.

But then you, and others of your ilk, buy into the double standard of judging others.

You are so full of hyperbole ("not to mention, destroy our economy") and some other unmentionable sewage that can't help but present yourself and everything you say as pitiable and show yourself to be an inveterate prevaricator.

So...what else is new?

June 16, 2011 5:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

you may notice that your heroes aren't in agreement with you

no Dems are calling for Vitter to leave but they all wanted the Weiner to go

go figure

as for Frank, America paid the price for tolerating him

you think he'd resign out of decency, considering the lives tragically ruined by his activity

how is the damage he caused different from Bernie Madoff?

June 16, 2011 5:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

another day of disgrace for the Democratic Party:

"In announcing that he will resign from Congress on Thursday, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) was heckled as he addressed the media at a press conference in his New York district.

"Today I am announcing my resignation from Congress," said the lawmaker.

Cheers from some in attendance could be heard as Weiner announced he was stepping down from his post.

As the New York Democrat continued making his remarks, one man continued to heckle Weiner, making it hard to hear his speech. The man yelled "bye-bye pervert" and asked him about the size of his penis.

Huma Abedin, Weiner's wife and a close adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, did not appear alongside her husband at the press conference."

June 16, 2011 5:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""illicit homosexuality"? Get with it, nutty "Anonymous"

Seems like prostitution is illicit"

now, here's something interesting

this is a tired tactic of the lunatic fringe to act as though anyone who thinks there is anything wrong with homosexual deviance is crazy

(meaning civilization throughout time and most of the world today is absolutely insane)

but that's not the interesting part

it's that this individual thinks homosexual deviance is fine but
prostitution is wrong

what argument is there against prostitution that doesn't also apply to homogaeity?

and, btw, Barney Frank had a homosexual prostitution ring running out of his townhouse since he should be out of public office either way

could you imagine if a Republican had conventional whorehouse operating out of his house?

June 16, 2011 6:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Former New York Giants wide receiver David Tyree has some strong words for his stance on opposing gay marriage.

“If they pass this gay marriage bill ... this will be the beginning of our country sliding toward — it’s a strong word — but anarchy. The moment we have, and if you trace back to other cultures, other countries, that will be the moment where our society itself loses its grip with what’s right. ... Marriage is the backbone of society, so if you redefine it, it changes the way we educate our children, it changes the perception of what is good, what is right, what is just,” Tyree said.

Tyree says that “marriage is honorable in the sight of God between a man and a woman.”

A sixth-round draft pick by the Giants in 2003, Tyree played in New York till 2008. Tyree is remembered for an incredible catch he made from Eli Manning in the Giants' Super Bowl XLII victory.

June 16, 2011 10:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"President Barack Obama says that Anthony Weiner will be able to “bounce back smartly” from the sexting scandal that led him to announce his resignation from Congress Thursday.

"I wish Rep. Weiner and his lovely wife well," Obama said in an interview scheduled to air on "Good Morning America" Friday. "Obviously, it's been a tough incident for him, but I'm confident that they'll refocus and he'll refocus, and they'll end up being able to bounce back."

Weiner finally bowed to the pressure on him to resign that had been building since he tweeted a lewd photo of himself and admitted to having inappropriate online relationships with six women.

“I am here today to again apologize for the personal mistakes I have made, and the embarrassment I have caused," Weiner said at a press conference Thursday.

"I had hoped to be able to continue the work that the citizens of my district elected me to do. Unfortunately, the distraction that I have created made that impossible. So today I am announcing my resignation from Congress," Weiner said."

poor guy

he was born that way

June 16, 2011 10:33 PM  
Anonymous Aunt Bea said...

Weiner has a $5 million campaign war chest. He will bounce back.

LATimes reports

Over howls from hecklers and cheers from die-hard fans, Rep. Anthony Weiner resigned from Congress in a brief and raucous news conference that raised more questions than it answered, from the future prospects for the fallen Democratic star and his district to the whereabouts of his wife, who was a no-show as her husband's sexting scandal cost him his job.

Ten days after confessing that he had sent sexually provocative online messages to several women, Weiner bowed to pressure that peaked this week when President Obama said that if he were in the congressman's shoes, he would quit. Weiner, who had vowed to stay in office, acknowledged Thursday that the scandal was hampering his, and all of Congress', ability to work.

"I had hoped to be able to continue the work that the citizens of my district had elected me to do: to fight for the middle class and those struggling to make it," Weiner said. "Unfortunately, the distraction I have created has made that impossible."

What lies ahead is far from certain.

If Weiner decided to try a political comeback, he would have the means: He has nearly $5 million in campaign money, nearly all of it in a committee formed for his mayoral bid. The seven-term congressman had made it clear he planned to run for mayor of New York in 2013.

Members of the New York congressional delegation expressed sadness over their colleague's fall, but optimism about his future.

"There's no doubt in my mind this is not the end of Mr. Weiner," said Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), who has known Weiner since he served on the New York City Council. "He's a very talented individual and he's done a lot of good things."

Towns said he wouldn't rule out a Weiner mayoral candidacy. "You never know. There are other people who made mistakes and have bounced back and are doing great things. After all, these things happen all the time."

But crisis management expert Gene Grabowski of Levick Strategic Communications, a Washington firm with a client roster that includes politicians, athletes and corporations, said Weiner's first move should be to finish whatever treatment he is receiving.

"Then you come out, you redeem yourself. You talk a little bit about your experience, how you've seen the error of your ways. People love rebirth in this country," said Grabowski, citing former Washington Mayor Marion Barry, who was caught on camera smoking crack cocaine with a prostitute. "He went to prison, found religion, starting singing 'Amazing Grace,' and it worked,' " Grabowski said.

Grabowski expressed doubts that Weiner could return to politics because of the repeated lying that preceded his confession. Instead, he suggested Weiner could look toward the career he envisioned in college: TV personality. That's the route taken by former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, who was forced to resign in 2008 amid a prostitution scandal and who now has a show on CNN.

But Lanny Davis, a Clinton White House veteran who also runs a Washington crisis management firm, said he believed Weiner still had a shot at politics.

"I learned a lot from my experience with President Clinton," said Davis. "The American people are pretty smart and they are pretty compassionate, and they get the distinction between human weakness and public performance in office."

June 17, 2011 9:14 AM  
Anonymous David S. Fishback said...

"born that way" or not, the point is that his behavior was a betrayal of the person to whom he committed to be faithful. It is the breach of trust, the fact that his behavior hurt others to whom he owed a responsibility, that made his behavior improper.

Of course, Anon's effort is to say that just because gay people are "born that way," doesn't mean that they should live their lives consistent with their sexual orientation. But living such authentic lives hurts no one, and adds to happiness in the world. Not to do so leads to unhappiness. Just ask former Gov. McGreavey's wife.

As for David Tyree, he starts with the assumption that civil marriage equality would be neither right nor just. I would be curious to hear him explain why such equality would be wrong and unjust. Being a great athlete does not necessarily make one a wise person. If he is going to use his celebrity to get a platform, he owes the public not just his conclusions, but his underlying assumptions and reasoning.

June 17, 2011 3:29 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home