Saturday, December 16, 2017

Trump Administration Censors Government Medical Researchers

I sometimes wonder what it is that Trump and his followers want. They want to get rid of anything that reminds them of Obama, of course, and they want to "lock her up." But besides that, is there something they stand for?

Now we know.

The Trump administration has issued a list of banned terms for the Centers for Disease Control, which makes it clear what they want. The Post:
The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus” and “transgender” — in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.” CDC gets list of forbidden words: fetus, transgender, diversity
Naturally, the Post reporter jumps on the "hot" news words -- fetus, transgender -- we are not surprised to see a retreat to the Dark Ages there, but it is beyond comprehension to see that "evidence-based" and "science-based" are verboten. Oh, fine, I see "magic" and "potion" are still okay. Can you imagine the executive committee that decided the CDC's research should not be evidence-based or science-based? What a bunch of geniuses that must have been.
In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases. Instead of “science-based” or ­“evidence-based,” the suggested phrase is “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,” the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.
There's your conservative philosophy in a nutshell. It doesn't much matter what science finds, what matters is what your ordinary person thinks or wishes were true. Never mind all that algebra and all that college education, anybody can see what's going on. Everybody knows how they wish it was, and that is how it shall be.

"Vulnerable?" Can you imagine studying disease and epidemics without consideration of who is vulnerable?

And I'm sorry, but if you're looking at an epidemic, diversity is a major factor, diversity among the vulnerable population as well as genetic diversity in a pathogen. Any statistical prediction needs to account for variance, which is just another word for diversity -- that is how statisticians are able to assess the certainty of a prediction.

According to the article, the rank-and-file scientists at the CDC have not learned of these changes yet. But as one analyst said, “Our subject matter experts will not lay down quietly."

This sort of enforced ignorance has become a hallmark of the Trump administration. Still, it is jaw-dropping to see the list, to see that someone thought it was a good idea to dumb down the CDC and turn medical research into something that conforms with community wishes.

83 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Trump Administration is deplorable.

Not only are they dumbing down science, they are dumbing down the judiciary with judicial picks who are unable to answer questions about legal and courtroom terms.

Trump/Bannon's chosen candidate, Roy Moore, lost the Senate race in deeply red Alabama.

Americans, even deeply red ones, are sick of Trump's support of pussy grabbers and assorted idiots and thugs.

Next up, the tidal wave of 2018.


December 16, 2017 7:41 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wow, just wow.

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

You can see that the highest priority of conservatives has nothing to do with their alleged "values", its all about pissing off liberals at any cost.

December 16, 2017 1:09 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

"Next up, the tidal wave of 2018."

I wouldn't get your hopes up. Sure, if congressional elections were held tomorrow Democrats would clean up but those elections are a year away and a lot can (and probably will) happen in that time - it could be a whole different ball game in a year.

Typically Democrats sit back and let Republicans lie with impunity. If they don't make a concerted effort to counter Republican lies and promote their own policies there's a good chance Republican lies will turn the tide by the time of the 2018 congressional elections.

December 16, 2017 1:13 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The Trump administration - flagrantly violating the first amendment.

They're Nazis!

December 17, 2017 1:25 AM  
Anonymous Vote buying in the Senate said...

A last-minute addition to the tax bill that could personally save Donald Trump and several GOP leaders millions of dollars in taxes was a way to “cobble together” enough votes to get the controversial measure passed, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) admitted to ABC.

The new provision would allow owners of income-producing real estate to take advantage of a 20 percent deduction for money in “pass-through” entities such as limited liability companies. The deduction would likely save the president, his family, and Republican leaders tens of millions of dollars in taxes, according to an analysis by the International Business Times. Trump and other members of Congress have stakes in several real estate-related LLCs and similar entities.

The new deduction was slipped into the tax measure Friday during the process reconciling the two bills from the House and Senate. Shortly after the provision was added, GOP swing vote Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) suddenly declared his support for the bill. If passed, the provision would boost Corker’s income through his real estate holdings, IBT reported.

Asked by George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday why the new break was added so late, Cornyn responded: “Well, we were working very hard. It was a very intense process ... And what we’ve tried to do is cobble together the votes we needed to get this bill passed.”

The Senate majority whip argued that the tax reform will benefit everybody and that’s it’s not fair to single out one multi-million-dollar tax break in a 1,000-page measure.

Cornyn conceded that if the Democrats had participated in negotiating the measure, “we probably could have made it better.”

Cornyn dodged a question and switched subjects when Stephanopoulos asked: “So is that how you got Senator Corker, with this provision?”

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told ABC that he doesn’t know how the provision slipped into the bill. “What we do know is they’re behind closed doors,” he said. “There are a whole army of lobbyists who were surrounding them, and the longer they’re in there, the more you see these special interest provisions.” He said the provision “would be a windfall to Donald Trump based on everything we know. Of course, he hasn’t released his tax returns.”

Van Hollen said the bill, which slashes corporate taxes from 35 percent to 21 percent, and doubles estate tax exemptions for multi-millionaires, is a “total betrayal” of Trump’s “economic populist message.” People are “catching on,” added Van Hollen. “That’s why it’s so unpopular.”

Strangely, Corker sent a letter on Sunday to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) asking how the provision that benefits him made it into the final version of the tax-reform bill, The Hill reported.

“Because this issue has raised concerns, I would ask that you provide an explanation of the evolution of this provision and how it made it into the final conference report,” Corker wrote.

IBT previously reported that 13 GOP lawmakers wielding key power in the tax bill — including House Speaker Paul Ryan — have between $36 million and $163 million in pass-through real estate Entities, which generated between $2.6 million and $16 million in “pass through” income.

Trump made between $41 million and $68 million from 25 “pass-through” businesses he owned in 2016, while Corker earned between $1.2 million and $7 million in rental income from his companies last year, IBT reported.

The bill is expected to be voted on this week.

December 18, 2017 9:05 AM  
Anonymous unresponsive, irrelevant Dems said...

"The bill is expected to be voted on this week."

the bill will pass this week

meanwhile, another major Dem donor is exposed:

"After California’s then-Attorney General Kamala D. Harris announced felony pimping charges last year against the two owners of Backpage.com — a classified-ad website that is a hub for sex trafficking and prostitution, one of the men cut a $10,000 check to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s super PAC.

Mrs. Pelosi’s political action committee, House Majority PAC, has resisted giving the money back.

The uproar over sexual harassment that began with the Harvey Weinstein scandal has intensified the scrutiny of political contributions linked to Backpage, which law enforcement officials say is the chief platform for activities far worse than harassment, including sexual slavery and child prostitution.

Mrs. Pelosi isn’t the only Democrat struggling to deal with the piles of cash that Backpage’s owners spread around to candidates and state Democratic parties over the years.

Even Ms. Harris, a California Democrat who is now a U.S. senator, ducked the issue. Her office wouldn’t respond to repeated emails about Backpage money going to House Majority PAC and other Democratic organizations."

December 18, 2017 11:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Trump administration will drop climate change from a list of global threats in a new National Security Strategy the president is due to unveil on Monday.

Instead, Trump’s NSS paper will emphasis the need for the US to regain its economic competitiveness in the world.

That stance represents a correction of the Obama administration’s NSS, which placed climate change as one of the tippity-top dangers facing the nation and made building international consensus on containing global warming a tippity-top national security priority.

The Trump NSS was the culmination of 11 months of collaboration between all the leading security, foreign policy and economic agencies of government.

“Climate change is not identified as a national security threat but climate and the importance of the environment and environmental stewardship are discussed,” a senior administration official said.

Another official said Trump’s remarks when he took the US out of the infamous Paris climate accord “would be the guidepost for the language in the NSS on climate”.

In that speech in June, Trump sagely noted “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris” and that the agreement “hamstrings the United States while empowering some of the world’s top polluting countries”.

December 18, 2017 11:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The inspiration behind the Women’s March on DC, Linda Sarsour, has been accused of enabling the alleged sexual assault and harassment of a woman who worked for the feminist activist, according to the victim and two sources directly familiar with the matter.

Allegations of groping and unwanted touching were allegedly brought to Sarsour during her time as executive director of the Arab American Association. In response, Sarsour, a self-proclaimed champion of women, attacked the woman bringing the allegations, often threatening and body-shaming her, these sources alleged. The most serious allegations were dismissed, Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim said, because the accused was a “good Muslim” who was “always at the Mosque.”

----

An MSNBC spokesman confirmed Saturday the company made a payment to one of Chris Matthews employees after the woman complained about sexual harassment.

Two sources familiar with the situation said Matthews paid $40,000 to settle with an assistant producer on his show, “Hardball with Chris Matthews,”after she accused him of harassment.

Matthews has been the host of “Hardball” since 1997 and was so pro-Obama in 2008 and 2012 that he was accused of being paid by Obama's campaign.

He is the latest in a string of high-profile Dem men in media to be accused of sexual misconduct, particularly at NBC.

In late November, NBC News fired Matt Lauer, longtime host of “The Today Show,” after an employee complained about inappropriate behavior. Additional women accused him of sexual harassment and assault, and some insisted that executives at the network knew about his behavior

December 18, 2017 12:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many suspected that Al Franken's announcement that he would resign soon was a ruse by Dems to gain leverage in the Alabama Senate race.

That now seems confirmed.

At least four senators are urging Al Franken to reconsider resigning, including two who issued statements calling for the resignation two weeks ago and said they now feel remorse.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said the Minnesota senator was railroaded by fellow Democrats.

“What they did to Al was atrocious, the Democrats,” said Manchin.

Franken's unusual timeline — in his departure announcement he said he’d go “in the coming weeks,” without setting a date — has fed the fleeting hopes that there’s still time to reverse course.

“The most hypocritical thing I’ve ever seen done to a human being — and then have enough guts to sit on the floor, watch him give his speech and go over and hug him? That’s hypocrisy at the highest level I’ve ever seen in my life. Made me sick,” Manchin said.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who issued a statement calling for Franken's resignation, has since told him privately that he regrets doing so, according to two people familiar with the conversation. Leahy declined to comment.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” said a third senator who has also called for the resignation, and has since expressed regret directly to Franken. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.” The senator asked not to be named because of the political sensitivity of the issue among Democrats.

Two of the senators who issued resignation calls said they felt rushed to weigh in, as they were focused on hearings and other meetings and pressure on Franken mounted. In retrospect they said they signed off on statements without the appropriate care and thought.

Franken’s office declined to comment. The senator has been spending time with his colleagues as he comes to terms with leaving. He made a surprise appearance last Tuesday night at a Bible study group. Franken had never attended before but joined at the urging of a colleague.

The feeling that Franken should reconsider has gained some steam outside of the Senate, too, among Democratic donors and others, including a former Republican governor of Minnesota, Arne Carlson.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said Emily Jane Goodman, a retired New York state Supreme Court judge who’s helped start a Feminists for Franken group on Facebook.

----

WASHINGTON – Senator-elect Doug Jones is already breaking with prominent Democrats by refusing to call for President Trump to step down over ongoing sexual harassment allegations.

“I don’t think that the president ought to resign,” Jones (D-Ala.) told CNN’s “State of the Union.”

In his first round of Sunday show interviews since securing a victory in red state Alabama , Jones said he doesn’t want to get bogged down in Trump’s sexual harassment allegations and would rather work on “real issues.”

“I think we need to move on and not get distracted by those issues,” Jones added. “Let’s get on with the real issues that are facing the people of this country right now.”

That’s at odds with high-profile Democrats who believe Trump should step down because at least 19 women have accused him of sexual misconduct.

Unlike other politicians who have stepped down, like Sen. Al Franken and Rep. John Conyers, Jones said the difference is the voters knew about these allegations and still elected Trump to the highest office.

“Those allegations were made and he was elected president of the United States,” Jones said. “I think the American people spoke.”

“We need to move on and try to work with some real issues that are facing the country and not worry about getting at odds with the president any more than we have to,” Jones said.

Gillibrand last week said Trump “committed assault” according to the “very credible allegations” and “he should resign.”

December 18, 2017 12:27 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump Is Least Popular First-Year President In History

Newsweek reports:

According to President Donald Trump, his administration has been one of the most successful in American history. But the public strongly disagrees.

The Republican Trump is now the least popular first-year president in the country’s history and a vast majority believes he has failed to keep the promises that won him the White House, according to two new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research polls.

The results showed a poor approval rating for Trump. The president received a 32 percent rating, marking Trump as the least-popular commander-in-chief since approval ratings were recorded. Conversely, Trump received a 67 percent disapproval rating.

And the first year of a presidency is the honeymoon period!

December 18, 2017 12:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I sometimes wonder what it is that Trump and his followers want. They want to get rid of anything that reminds them of Obama, of course, and they want to "lock her up." But besides that, is there something they stand for?

Now we know."

Actually, you don't.

Trump, like clever politicians of the past, LBJ comes to mind, has built a coalition of people who support him for different reasons, although many dislike him personally. That's hard for a blog to handle, I know.

"The Trump administration has issued a list of banned terms for the Centers for Disease Control, which makes it clear what they want. The Post:
The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus” and “transgender” — in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.” CDC gets list of forbidden words: fetus, transgender, diversity
Naturally, the Post reporter jumps on the "hot" news words -- fetus, transgender -- we are not surprised to see a retreat to the Dark Ages there, but it is beyond comprehension to see that "evidence-based" and "science-based" are verboten. Oh, fine, I see "magic" and "potion" are still okay. Can you imagine the executive committee that decided the CDC's research should not be evidence-based or science-based? What a bunch of geniuses that must have been."

part of the problem is that liberals have played so many games with words that words begin to lose their meaning and develop connotations

banning certain over-used or ill-used words in government studies is fine

scientists are educated enough to find alternative phrases that will better convey precise meaning and allow readers to understand what they are saying

let's take a look:'

“vulnerable”

how does this come up in a scientific study? sounds like an advocacy term

“entitlement”

a political concept

why would the CDC need to use it?

“diversity”

imprecise and political

used as a buzz word

“transgender”

gays argue about the definition of this

“fetus”

used to imply that unborn children are not alive and deserve no protection

“evidence-based” and “science-based”

used by liberals to describe every opinion they have

describe the evidence or science and let the reader do their own thinking

December 18, 2017 1:05 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists."

Hannah Arendt
The Origins of Totalitarianism

December 18, 2017 1:13 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Christian “Prophet”: Trump Will Release Secret Cures For Cancer And Alzheimer’s During His Second Term

So, I know most of you Americans were planning on voting against Trump in 2020, but you better not otherwise Trump won't release the secret cures!

December 18, 2017 1:27 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

When in reality:
If Obama cured cancer Trump would bring it back.

December 18, 2017 1:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"According to President Donald Trump, his administration has been one of the most successful in American history. But the public strongly disagrees.

The Republican Trump is now the least popular first-year president in the country’s history and a vast majority believes he has failed to keep the promises that won him the White House, according to two new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research polls.

The results showed a poor approval rating for Trump. The president received a 32 percent rating, marking Trump as the least-popular commander-in-chief since approval ratings were recorded. Conversely, Trump received a 67 percent disapproval rating."

the Post ran a similar poll in yesterday's opinion section

it showed that everyone disliked Trump, believes the country is headed in the wrong direction, and disagree with how he's handled almost every issue

and yet, buried deep, are findings that indicate he'll likely be re-elected

1. asked whether 2017 has been a good year or a bad year for the US economy, 62% say good

2. asked whether 2017 has been a good year or a bad year for them personally, 68% say good

3. asked whether 2017 has been a good year or a bad year for the quality of press coverage, 61% say bad

4. consumer confidence is up 32 points from July 2016

5. asked to rate the "national economy", 61% said excellent good

6. 49% support the appointment of Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS vs. 36% who oppose it

Trump was elected because he addressed the economic concerns of lower middle income and blue collar workers and because he promised to support judges to the SCOTUS that would defend the Constitution

sounds like he's on track for re-election

December 18, 2017 1:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists."

yes, this is why liberals so often try to redefine words

it's called Orwellianism and it's the preferred technique of liberals

the gay movement, especially, has always been totalitarian

it has to be, because unless they can use such tactics, they will never win by actual honest argumentation and suasion

thus, one can only use the term "orientation" to describe sexual preferences because it implies innateness and identity, entitled to protection rather than a matter of choice

no science supports this

thus, one can only use the term "fetus" to describe unborn children because it implies lack of humanity, not entitled to protection and rights

no science supports this

the list goes on

liberals like the terms "evidence-based" or "science-based" rather than describe the evidence because they know the evidence for most of their positions is scant

December 18, 2017 1:54 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Canadian Government Warns Citizens to Watch Out for U.S. Police Robbing Them

State and federal law enforcement officers are reportedly shaking down Canadians visiting the US, illegally confiscating legally carried cash. Over 61,000 of these incidents have occurred since 9/11, resulting in $2.5 billion being seized.

So many incidents like this and people being jailed on fake charges, Canadians in the U.S. Like Maher Arar being kidnapped by American authorities and sent to third world countries to be imprisoned and tortured with no evidence against them. You couldn't pay me to cross the border into the States.

December 18, 2017 2:19 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

So back in October I read an article saying Canada was going to have a brutally cold winter. We got a bit of seasonable cold in November but since then we've had about a month of much warmer than normal tempertures hovering near or above freezing.

I remember reading that article and thinking "lol, I'll believe it when I see it".

Temperatures are forecasted to drop a lot tomorrow and remain at more normal levels for the next week though.

As global warming makes large swaths of the U.S. unliveable we may have to build a wall to keep the Americans out. But the United States will pay for it.

December 18, 2017 2:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"State and federal law enforcement officers are reportedly shaking down Canaduhins visiting the US, illegally confiscating carried cash"

yeeeeaaahhh, I gotta a feeling it's all perfectly legal

ya gotta watch Canaduhins

they're sneaky!!

"Over 61,000 of these incidents have occurred since 9/11, resulting in $2.5 billion being seized."

nice!

good down payment on that tax cut for deserving American citizens

"So many incidents like this and people being jailed on fake charges, Canaduhins in the U.S. Like Maher Arar being kidnapped by American authorities and sent to third world countries to be imprisoned and tortured with no evidence against them."

cool!

that'll encourage 'em to pay a hefty bail before they flee

which will make a good down payment on that tax cut for deserving American citizens

"You couldn't pay me to cross the border into the States"

we'll keep that in mind

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

I mean, when the problem arises

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

"So back in October I read an article saying Canaduh was going to have a brutally cold winter. We got a bit of seasonable cold in November but since then we've had about a month of much warmer than normal tempertures hovering near or above freezing"

oh, that's a relief

at least the AGW hoax is still on

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

"I remember reading that article and thinking "lol, I'll believe it when I see it""

you were "thinking" again?

you should check with the doctor

unused muscles need to be worked out a little before use, to avoid strains and sprains

"Temperatures are forecasted to drop a lot tomorrow and remain at more normal levels for the next week though"

ooops!!

well, just keep talking about AGW like nothin's happening

"As global warming makes large swaths of the U.S. unliveable we may have to build a wall to keep the Americans out."

I don't see people from Tahiti and the Seychelles dying to cross the border into Canaduh

"But the United States will pay for it."

why not?

we already pay most of your defense costs

December 18, 2017 6:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Something is happening in the final days of 2017. People are noticing that Donald Trump has gotten a lot done in his tumultuous first year in the White House.

If in, say, 2014, a Republican, of either the conservative or moderate variety, predicted that in 2017 a newly-elected GOP president and Congress would —

1. Cut corporate and individual taxes.
2. Repeal the Obamacare individual mandate.
3. Appoint a highly-respected conservative to the Supreme Court.
4. Appoint a one-year record number of judges to the circuit courts.
5. Get rid of reams of unnecessary regulations.
6. Destroy ISIS.
7. Approve pipeline projects and new oil drilling.

-- then a lot of Republicans would probably have cheered. Loudly.

Trump has racked up a solid record of first-year accomplishments.

December 18, 2017 10:13 PM  
Anonymous tonight we're gonna rock out like it's 2017 said...

Donald Trump — a political neophyte, a New York loudmouth who plays fast and loose with the truth, a massive egotist and a not altogether pleasant human being — has delivered conservatives one of the greatest years in living memory and has made our government more moral in the process. The left and many on the right didn't see it coming because they hate the man. And because they didn't see it coming, they won't see that it's come.

The first assertion is easily proven. After a year of Trump, the economy is in high gear, stocks are up, unemployment is down, energy production is up, business expansion is up and so on; ISIS — which took more than 23,000 square miles of territory after Obama left Iraq and refused to intervene in Syria — is now in control of a Port-o-San and a book of matches; 19 constitutionalist judges have been appointed and 40 more nominated; the biggest regulatory rollback in American history has been launched (boring but yugely important); the rule of law has been re-established at the border; we're out of the absurd and costly Paris Accord; net neutrality, the most cleverly named government power grab ever, is gone; our foreign policy is righted and revitalized; and a mainstream news media that had become little more than the information arm of the Democratic Party is in self-destructive disarray. The tax bill will cap an unbelievable string of conservative successes.

December 18, 2017 10:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sometimes wonder what it is that Hillary and her followers want. They want to get rid of anything that reminds them of Trump of course, and they want to "lock him up." But besides that, is there something they stand for?

We don't know.

The Democratic Party is without an affirmative policy agenda. As a result, Democrats in the House and Senate and Democratic candidates everywhere are moving to the left. In particular, House Democrats are increasingly calling for Trump’s impeachment, while their Senate counterparts are calling for his resignation. It appears the leftward lurch that Sen. Bernie Sanders started has taken on a life of its own and is out of control.

The Democrats’ last effort at having something positive to offer voters was a comical failure. Does anyone even remember when House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) launched her “A Better Deal” campaign in July? Despite efforts to refresh the platform’s website, it appears that Pelosi has essentially abandoned it altogether. The word “fizzle” doesn’t even begin to capture its non-performance.

However, after eight years of disheartening and debilitating low growth, President Trump and Republicans in Congress have made a positive impact on the economy. Forecasts for the months ahead look good, consumer confidence is up, the repeal of net neutrality will return capitalism to the Internet, stock market advances are contributing to the “wealth effect,” businesses see that the war on regulation has only just begun and, with tax reform on the brink, chief executives and entrepreneurs throughout the country know that an all-around pro-business vibe has taken hold in Washington. While the process associated with the tax bill’s formation has not been particularly flattering or well communicated, none of that will matter if it produces a lift to the economy. Voters care about job growth, better wages and feeling economic momentum — not how tax law is formulated.

Normally it would be foolish to take today’s headlines and extrapolate out to the next election. But I believe Democratic street cred and enthusiasm from the left are going to be measured in terms of how pro-impeachment a candidate is. Democrats who want to emerge from the herd next year or believe they will have to defend against a primary challenge from the left have come to realize that the more strident they are in calling for Trump’s impeachment, the louder the applause will be from their core voters.

It is worth noting that 75 percent of Democrats surveyed by Public Policy Polling in October support impeaching Trump. Nothing will happen before November to reduce that number, and the need for any remotely sensible reason to impeach Trump will be lost on Democrats come next fall. The Democrats want Trump’s head on a platter. They will have to be either be pro-impeachment or risk being seen within their own party as dragging their feet and behind the rank and file. Already, 58 House Democrats — or 30 percent of their caucus — have voted favorably on a motion to impeach Trump. And that was after Pelosi and Sanders explicitly warned against voting in favor of impeachment. As of Friday morning, eight Democratic senators had called for Trump’s resignation as well.

Simply put, we could be headed for a midterm election defined by the Democrats’ call to remove Trump from office and the Republicans’ success in creating a good and growing economy. Impeachment vs. a vibrant economy is about as good a contrast between Republicans and Democrats that the GOP could hope for.

Running on impeachment alone is going to be risky for Democrats. According to Third Way’s Matt Bennett, Democrats should adopt an 80-20 rule next year and only talk Trump 20 percent of the time. But the Democrats are obsessed with Trump and showing every sign of having this equation backward. If the only thing Democrats offer next year is a call for Trump’s impeachment and the usual claims of the GOP’s mistreatment of widows and orphans, then Republicans will damp the wave that is building against them.

December 18, 2017 10:28 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/bad anonymous said "banning certain over-used or ill-used words in government studies is fine scientists are educated enough to find alternative phrases that will better convey precise meaning and allow readers to understand what they are saying".

Laypeople have no business trying to tell scientists what words are appropriate or inappropriate to use. There is nothing "overused" or "illused about thse banned phrases. Scientists shouldn't be asked to come up with alternative phrases that may be less accurate or descriptive when they have perfectly fine ones for the meaning they want to convey. Banning scientific words makes communications less accurate and clear.

Wyatt/bad anonymous said "let's take a look:' “vulnerable” how does this come up in a scientific study? sounds like an advocacy term".

That's pretty stupid of you. The idea that the centres for disease control should not discuss which populations are vulnerable to certain diseases like blacks and sickle cell anemia is counterproductive and foolish.

Wyatt/bad anonymous said “entitlement” a political concept why would the CDC need to use it?".

To discuss appropriate policies to deal with diseases.

Wyatt/bad anonymous said “diversity” imprecise and political used as a buzz word".

Nonsense. This is important when discussing the nature of populations that might be applicable to disease or the approaches to dealing with disease. I.E. is the population affected by a disease homogenous or diverse, will one approach work for the affected or are multiple approaches a better idea.

December 18, 2017 11:43 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/bad anonymous said "“transgender” gays argue about the definition of this".

Another stupid response - gays don't argue about the defintion of this, anyone who is knowledgeable knows it refers to anyone who doesn't adhere to stereotypical gender roles assigned based on genitalia at birth. Virtually all medical associations support transgender identity as real and valid. (The American Medical Association, in fact, even condemned “bathroom bills.”). There is widespread scientific consensus that transgender people are real, that their health care is medically necessary, and that they should be protected from harm. Your "most gay friendly presidential candidate ever" is banning the word in a ham fisted attempt to prevent the CDC from trying to help transgender people.

Wyatt/bad anonymous said “fetus” used to imply that unborn children are not alive and deserve no protection".

Another stupid comment - no one asserts that fetuses are not alive and the term itself does not imply desirability or lack of desirability of "protection". This is a scientifically accurate word and banning it once again merely obfuscates the meaning of discussions surrounding fetuses which is counterproductive.

Wyatt/bad anonymous “evidence-based” and “science-based” used by liberals to describe every opinion they have describe the evidence or science and let the reader do their own thinking".

An absurd assertion - liberals do not describe every opinion this way. These words are important to distinguish between opinions and science which there is good reason to accept as true. Laypeople aren't in a position to judge what is science and what is not and need to be told what believes there is good reason to believe are true and what beliefs are mere opinion, conjecture, and speculation. For example, some people believe vaccines cause autism and are unsafe. Lay people need to know from the experts that such opinions are neither evidence based or science based and as such no weight should be put behind them.

December 18, 2017 11:44 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The Republican tax bill will raise taxes on 60% of Americans and result in a 1.5 trillion dollar deficit to give tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and corporations. The tax cut will harm the economy by lowering the income of low income and middle income Americans who generally spend everything they make, thus taking money out of the economy and putting it into the hands of the wealthy who won't spend any additional money because they already are able to buy everything they want.

Republicans are rushing this tax plan through with no substantive hearings on it, without any substantive expert testimony, and no input from a single Democrat, because they know its a piece of crap and the more time people have to see whats in it the more opposed to it they'll be. Contrast this with Obamacare which had over a year of consultations, analysis, hearings, and Republicans were deeply involved in the process fromt the beginning and making over 100 amendments to it.

Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to the Republican tax plan. Republicans are subverting democracy to line the pockets of the wealthy and harm low and middle income Americans.

December 19, 2017 1:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Laypeople have no business trying to tell scientists what words are appropriate or inappropriate to use"

if the scientists are employees of said "laypeople" and the scientists have gone beyond science and veered into advocacy, then the aforementioned laymen have every right to insist that scientists stick to science and to stop misusing science to propel a political agenda

"Banning scientific words makes communications less accurate and clear"

oh, I think the English language is big enough compensate for the loss of seven words that have been misconstrued

indeed, liberal manipulations have already destroyed the words

"The idea that the centres for disease control should not discuss which populations are vulnerable to certain diseases like blacks and sickle cell anemia is counterproductive and foolish"

they can discuss that all they want

they'll just have to find another term to convey the idea

I have confidence in their ability to do so

"To discuss appropriate policies to deal with diseases"

policies, aka politics, is something government-paid scientist should eschew

their role is to provide empirical evidence, not draw political conclusions

"Nonsense"

to those of you new to the blog, this is what Priya says to admit being wrong and not knowing what the hell they are talking about

"refers to anyone who doesn't adhere to stereotypical gender roles assigned based on genitalia at birth"

actually, that definition is incorrect and, frankly, offensive

"Virtually all medical associations support transgender identity as real and valid"

do they?

if so, they are out of their realm

whether what people think is reality is, by definition, a metaphysical concept

philosophers, theologians, and taxi drivers have opinions that are equally valid to scientists in dsaid realm

"There is widespread scientific consensus that transgender people are real,"

oh, they're real alright

that's not the question

the question is whether they are sane

"that their health care is medically necessary,"

if by "health care", you mean surgical disfigurement to make one appear closer to their delusional view of themselves, nonsense

hahahahahahahahaha!!

"and that they should be protected from harm"

yes, including from doctors who give them irreversible surgery to exploit their delusions

"no one asserts that fetuses"

it is used to lower human life to a clinical term

"liberals do not describe every opinion this way"

sure, they do

"These words are important to distinguish between opinions and science which there is good reason to accept as true. Laypeople aren't in a position to judge what is science and what is not and need to be told what believes there is good reason to believe are true and what beliefs are mere opinion, conjecture, and speculation"

in other words, we should accept anything a scientist says without any critical thought?

no thanks

December 19, 2017 7:40 AM  
Anonymous take it fromt the top said...

"The Republican tax bill will raise taxes on 60% of Americans"

a lie

"and result in a 1.5 trillion dollar deficit"

a lie

"The tax cut will harm the economy by lowering the income of low income and middle income Americans"

a lie

"who generally spend everything they make,"

a lie

"thus taking money out of the economy and putting it into the hands of the wealthy who won't spend any additional money because they already are able to buy everything they want"

a lie

"Republicans are rushing this tax plan through with no substantive hearings on it, without any substantive expert testimony, and no input from a single Democrat,"

rushing?

Dems have plenty of opportunity to give their opinion but have, instead, just thrown out lie like those Priya just chanted above

"because they know its a piece of crap"

well, that's a matter of opinion

but, if it's crap, we're gonna make the liberals eat it

"and the more time people have to see whats in it the more opposed to it they'll be"

a good rationale for never doing anything

say, weren't you whining recently about how the GOP can't pass anything?

now, you're getting a little more legislation than you bargained for

we'll give you something to whine about!!

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

"Contrast this with Obamacare"

OK

"which had over a year of consultations, analysis, hearings, and Republicans were deeply involved in the process fromt the beginning and making over 100 amendments to it"

well, they did that fromt the beginning and, strangely, cast not one vote for it

"Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to the Republican tax plan. Republicans are subverting democracy to line the pockets of the wealthy and harm low and middle income Americans."

well, they'll have an opportunity to vote on it next November

my guess is that the 67% of Americans who feel 2017 was a great year for them will want that to continue

December 19, 2017 7:52 AM  
Anonymous more than they bargained for!! said...

Republicans have tried, on and off, to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling since the 1980s. The effort has always engendered intense opposition and always been abandoned. A provision for drilling in ANWR is included in the Republican tax bill almost as an afterthought.

Republicans took a constitutional fight against ObamaCare’s individual mandate to the Supreme Court in 2012, and lost. They targeted it in their ObamaCare repeal-and-replace bill earlier this year, and lost. They tried again with a last-ditch “skinny repeal” bill, and lost yet again. Repeal of the individual mandate is also included in the Republican tax bill.

As the year ends, President Trump is compiling a solid record of accomplishment. Much of it is unilateral, dependent on extensive executive actions rolling back President Barack Obama’s regulations, impressive judicial appointments and the successful fight against ISIS overseas. The tax bill is the significant legislative achievement that heretofore has been missing.

For much of the year, Trump’s presidency had seemed to be sound and fury signifying not much besides the welcome ascension of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Now it’s sound and fury signifying a discernible shift of American government to the right.

It’s hard to see how a conventional Republican president would have done much better, except if he had managed to repeal ObamaCare, which was always going to be a dicey proposition given the narrow GOP majority in the Senate.

The tax cut is big — $1.5 trillion over 10 years, and even more if you account for the budgetary gimmicks — and has changes that conservative economists have sought for decades, particularly the lower corporate rate (from 35 to 21 percent), the move to a territorial tax system (companies would only be taxed on their earnings in the US) and the business expensing (companies can write off the full cost of new buildings and equipment).

These reforms are arguably as significant on the corporate side as the Reagan reforms of 1981 were on the individual side. They stand a good chance to be enduring, too — it’s unlikely we’re ever going back up to a 35 percent corporate rate or returning to a worldwide tax system.

Trump’s deregulation has been in full gear. The Environmental Protection Agency is unspooling major Obama-era rules, the Waters of the United States and the Clean Power Plan. The FCC reversed net neutrality. The Education Department rescinded an Obama administration Title IX letter that pushed colleges into abandoning due process in sexual-assault cases.

Obama administration rulings that occasioned fierce debates during his time in office have fallen by the wayside with barely a whimper.

Obama blocked the Keystone pipeline to appease environmentalists who vociferously argued the future of the planet was stake. Trump greenlighted it without a fuss. Obama imposed a contraception mandate feminists portrayed as the only obstacle between women and a “Handmaid’s Tale” future. Trump reversed it; contraception is still widely and easily available in America.

Maybe any Republican would’ve done much of what Trump has. But three acts stand out — pulling out of the Paris accords, de-certifying the Iran deal and declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel. All three demonstrated an imperviousness to polite opinion that is one of Trump’s signature qualities.

The president also began the process of ending the Obama amnesty for so-called DREAMers, and has re-established a baseline of immigration enforcement that has had an instant impact on illegal border crossings.

None of this is to deny Trump’s failings. Congressional leaders often have to work around his shambolic governing style. Next year could bring a bout of protectionism, and his opposition to entitlement reform during the campaign makes it unlikely Republicans will get a handle on spending. His toxic persona could drive a Democratic wave in the 2018 midterms.

Whatever next year brings, though, Republicans aren’t leaving this one empty-handed.

December 19, 2017 8:08 AM  
Anonymous fat cat holiday said...

good news!!!!!!!!!!!

the House passed a big tax cut for the rich this afternoon

it'll pass the Senate tonight and be signed by the Donald tomorrow

still time for the wealthy to buy presents with the extra money and get there by Christmas with Amazon two-day shipping

have an egg nog for me!!

December 19, 2017 2:38 PM  
Anonymous master blaster jammin' - jam on !! said...

just think, with a stroke of a pen, Trump will shortly:

1. reduce corporate taxes by 42%

2. destroy Obamacare

3. eliminate the corporate ATM

4. authorize drilling in the Arctic

5. double the amount he and other Richie Rich types can exclude from estate tax

boy, you guys shoulda nominated a good candidate in 2016

this is a disaster!

December 19, 2017 5:41 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Stupid Wyatt/bad anonymous is all happy that Republicans are raising his taxes, taking money out of the economy and slowing economic growth in order to give people like Trump more money who have no use for it.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

December 19, 2017 5:54 PM  
Anonymous Righty Tighty said...

Yeah, that'll show those libruls. Take that Obama. Man we showed em now, dint we? The takers will be paying for this for a long time.

December 19, 2017 6:10 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

I'd like to dedicate the following song to Wyatt/bad anonymous:


You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch.
You really are a heel.
You're as cuddly as a cactus,
You're as charming as an eel,
Mr. Grinch.
You're a bad banana with a greasy black peel.

You're a monster, Mr. Grinch.
Your heart's an empty hole.
Your brain is full of spiders.
You've got garlic in your soul, Mr Grinch.
I wouldn't touch you with a
Thirty-nine and a half foot pole.

You're a vile one, Mr. Grinch.
You have termites in your smile,
You have all the tender sweetness of a seasick crocodile,
Mr Grinch.
Given the choice between the two of you,
I'd take the seasick crocodile.

You're a foul one, Mr. Grinch.
You're a nasty wasty skunk.
Your heart is full of unwashed socks.
Your soul is full of gunk,
Mr Grinch.

The three best words that best describe you,
Are as follows, and I quote"
Stink!
Stank!
Stunk!

You're a rotter Mr Grinch
You're the king of sinful sots
Your heart's a dead tomato squashed with moldy purple spots
Mr Grinch

Your soul is an appalling dump heap
Overflowing with the most disgraceful
Assortment of deplorable rubbish imaginable,
Mangled up in tangled up knots.

You nauseate me, Mr Grinch
With a nauseous super nos
You're a crooked jerky jockey and,
You drive a crooked horse
Mr Grinch!

You're a three-decker sauerkraut
And toadstool sandwich,
With arsenic sauce!

December 19, 2017 7:21 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Don't forget everyone, only six shopping days left to get your Saturnalia presents!

December 19, 2017 8:00 PM  
Anonymous looks like the wealthy actually do spend money said...

The Fed is estimating GDP will grow at an annual rate of 4% in the fourth quarter

The Senate has passed a bill that cut the taxes of 93% of Americans

Buoyant American attitudes on the economy look set to show up in plentiful, record-setting holiday spending this season.

The CNBC All-America Survey found that average holiday spending intentions will top $900 for the first time in the 12-year history of the poll, eclipsing last year's estimate of $702 by a wide margin.

The nationwide survey of Americans found a surge in the percentage of Americans planning to spend more than $1,000.

"The holiday spending outlook is stronger than it has been in over decade," said Micah Roberts from Public Opinion Strategies. "People are more comfortable with where the economy is and where it's heading, prompting them to spend money this holiday season and help boost the economy as well."

The survey found that more than 50 percent believe the economy is in good or excellent shape and that half believe it's a good time to invest in stocks, the highest showing for both metrics in the survey.

The spending intentions appear to have been spurred by wealth and politics. Those who believe the stock market will rise show above-average plans to increase their spending. And holiday spending plans by Republicans, which are often larger than Democrats, are far larger this year than last year.

The median spending number of $498 is considerably lower than the average, a sign that the big gains are likely driven by several big spenders, likely the wealthiest. Median spending plans for those with $30,000 or less in income actually show a modest decline from 2016.

December 20, 2017 1:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Republicans are raising his taxes"

Stupid Priya thinks that Republicans are raising taxes on anyone other than hardcore liberal flakes that live in high tax states

the genius of the tax bill is that by limiting state tax deductions to a reasonable amount, it ends the subsidy of wasteful government spending in places like New York by reasonable folk in places like Texas

in short idiots who voted for Hillary in places like NY, California, and Massachusetts will have their taxes raised to pay for tax cuts to people who voted GOP in places like Alabama, Ohio, and Alaska

beautiful

"elections have consequences" - Barack Obama

if those liberals don't like it, they can lower their state taxes

and nominate someone feasible for President in 2020, not some has-been hag whose only accomplishment was to marry our sleaziest President ever

"taking money out of the economy"

only an imbecile would think reducing the amount that government confiscates is taking money out of the economy

Priya never went to school and took an economics course

in capitalist societies, the government is not synonymous with "the economy"

"and slowing economic growth"

the Fed is projecting 4% growth this quarter

the economy has shaken off Obama malaise

"in order to give people like Trump more money who have no use for it"

another Orwellian adventure in language distortion

government confiscation of less of your money is not a gift

the government doesn't own us, you idiotic communist

"Yeah, that'll show those libruls. ..... Man we showed em now, dint we?"

yes, we did

Congress has found a way to tax liberals more than conservatives

limit the deduction for high state taxes

and they are high where libruls live!!

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

the tax bill is a thing of political beauty

we gave the libruls a beaut

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

"You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch"

only a nut case would think not confiscating the money parents earned to take care of their kids after they are gone is "mean"

"Don't forget everyone, only six shopping days left to get your Saturnalia presents!"

this sentence is a lie

"everyone" doesn't celebrate Saturnalia

as a matter of fact, if you round it, no one does

however, with Merry Christmas back, stats are showing the strongest Christmas shopping season in decades

what a difference Wisconsin made!

an extra wedge of cheese in every stocking except liberals in high tax states

they're getting some of the coal they tried to ban

"elections have consequences" - Barack Obama

ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

December 20, 2017 9:26 AM  
Anonymous libruls went into a drifted bank and really got upsot ! said...

I love so much that that post was made

December 20, 2017 9:39 AM  
Anonymous Santa, I want a yacht - and that's not a lot! said...

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is hailing 2017 as a year of major Republican accomplishments, dismissing the “left of center” press coverage.

“If you look at 12 circuit judges, a new Supreme Court justice, the regulatory relief and now comprehensive tax reform for the first time in three decades, by any objective standard it’s been one heck of a good year for us,” McConnell said Tuesday.

McConnell said the tax legislation, conservative Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation to the Supreme Court and other confirmations to the federal bench “are a good thing to take to the American people” in the 2018 midterm elections.

The Senate has confirmed 12 appellate court nominees this year, the most during a president’s first year in office since 1891.

Using the Congressional Review Act, Congress has repealed 14 Obama-era regulations this year.

“Anytime you come out with a new proposal...it gets beat up a lot. Most of the press, left of center, hit it pretty hard. Of course the Democrats all doubled down against it,” he said, laughing.

“We’re confident this is a good issue to take to the American people.”

McConnell predicted the tax bill “will be a big issue” in the races of vulnerable Democratic incumbents in red states such as Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Joe Donnelly (Ind.) and Claire McCaskill (Mo.). Not one Democrat in Congress backed the tax-reform legislation that is expected to be signed into law soon.

He said it will provide $2,000 in tax relief to a typical family earning $73,000 a year and $1,300 in tax benefits to a single parent with one child earning $41,000 a year.

McConnell gave a preview of Republican political strategy in 2018 by declaring that Manchin, Donnelly, McCaskill and other vulnerable centrists have doubled down on the “status quo.”

“I guess that tells you that they think we’re doing just fine and there’s no way we can do better,” an ebullient McConnell told reporters at a press conference earlier in the day.

McConnell said the expected victory ranks close to the confirmation of Gorsuch to the Supreme Court earlier this year.

Gorsuch’s confirmation was a coup for the leader after he took heavy fire from Democrats last year for holding open the seat formerly occupied by the late Justice Antonin Scalia until after the presidential election.

Tax reform gives McConnell the ability to declare 2017 a yuuuge success.

McConnell said the high point for him, personally, came when McCain announced his support for the tax legislation.

He lauded the measure on Tuesday as “important to the country” and “geared toward the middle class.”

The sage Kentucky legislator emphasized the doubling of the standard deduction, the increase in the child tax credit and the lowering of individual tax rates.

Democrats have attacked the bill by arguing that while the corporate tax cuts are permanent, the individual tax relief measures will expire after 2025.

McConnell didn’t go so far as to guarantee that Congress will renew them, but warned the chances of individual tax breaks expiring are much higher if Democrats take control of the Senate.

“Bernie Sanders says if Democrats take over in 2018, they’re going to rescind virtually all of this well before 2026,” he said, referring to the independent Vermont senator, a prominent liberal nut case who may run again for president in 2020.

McConnell argued that it would also “make our companies internationally competitive again” by setting a 21 percent corporate tax rate and discourage them from moving jobs overseas by moving to a territorial tax system.

“Add it all up and you got all the tools to make America more competitive,” he said.

Canada loses!

December 20, 2017 9:50 AM  
Anonymous I forgot to mention one little thing, a ring said...

that the new tax bill will reduce taxes on corporations: great

that it will destroy Obamacare: wunderbar

that it will put Democrats in 2018 in the position of advocating tax hikes on the middle class: funny

that it will double the amount Americans can leave to their kids without paying tax: nice

that it will make America energy-independent by allowing drilling in the Arctic: patriotic

that it will all be paid for by taxing rich liberals in high-tax states who are always trying to raise everyone else's taxes: priceless!!

December 20, 2017 12:56 PM  
Anonymous making America great again in the new year said...

The House followed the Senate on Wednesday in voting to repeal ObamaCare's individual insurance mandate, fulfilling a longtime GOP goal targeting the health-care law.

Gutting the mandate that Americans buy insurance or pay a tax penalty has been a target of Republicans this year.

The measure was ultimately included in the GOP's tax overhaul, which passed along party lines this week in the Republican-led House and Senate.

“When the individual mandate is being repealed that means ObamaCare is being repealed,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Wednesday.

“We have essentially repealed ObamaCare, and we will come up with something much better," Trump added, saying block grants might be one approach.

During a House floor speech Tuesday, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) cast the mandate repeal as "finally restoring the freedom to make your own health-care choices."

“By repealing the individual mandate at the heart of ObamaCare, we are giving back the freedom and the flexibility to buy the health care that's right for you and your family," he said.

Without the mandate, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that 13 million fewer Americans will be forced to but particular health insurance in 2027. It also predicted individual insurance markets will remain stable “in almost all areas of the country throughout the coming decade.”

The individual mandate was included in ObamaCare to forcce young and healthy people to pay the costs of older and sicker enrollees.

The measure has not worked as intended and the mandate hasn’t been as effective as originally thought to entice people to buy health insurance.

“Today, we're turning Obamacare from a mandatory program into a voluntary program and providing additional tax relief for the millions and millions of Americans who have chosen and will choose not to buy a government-mandated product that for them provides not the value that they want,” Sen. John Barrasso (Wyo.), the No. 4 Senate Republican, noted on Tuesday.

The repeal of the individual mandate provided more than $300 billion in savings for Republicans to use to help pay for the tax bill, the CBO estimated.

A measure to stabilize the insurance marketplaces from Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and legislation from Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) to provide money to insurers to offset the cost of the chronically ill.

Alexander and Collins said in a joint statement after the House sent the tax bill to Trump’s desk on Wednesday that they had asked Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) not to put their legislation in a short-term spending bill, saying they would instead offer it in a larger package cutting spending in early 2018.

December 20, 2017 1:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

America's embrace of the gay agenda continues to degrade our society

latest?

currently in theaters and praised by critics is a new gay movie where a 24-year-old has an affair with the under 18 son of his professor

that's right

an adult having homosexual intercourse with a teen not old enough to vote

sick sick

sick sick

sick sick sick!!!

December 20, 2017 2:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Left’s rhetorical response to tax cuts represents a fundamental redefinition of private property. I’m starting to think that all too many Democrats believe that private citizens and private corporations don’t actually own their private income or their private property. Otherwise, how can we explain the Democratic insistence, repeated endlessly over the last 24 hours, that Republicans somehow are poised to execute a grand “heist” by cutting corporate and individual tax rates, granting an estimated 80.4 percent of taxpayers an average tax break of $2,140. The rhetoric was remarkable, and the hysterics weren’t confined to fringe figures on the left. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democratic presidential frontrunners Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders weighed in: Note the key words. A tax cut is a “heist.” It’s “looting” the government’s money. You’re “robbing” and “ransacking” the middle class. Schumer is the most measured, and even he acts like the government is “giving” people money by granting a tax break. Yes, part of this is just talking points. They’re words chosen to win a news cycle. But they also betray a deeper problem. Taken at face value they represent a fundamental redefinition of private property. It’s part of the Democratic march towards socialism, and it doesn’t just have implications for tax rates, it has grave consequences for civil liberties as well. The traditional view of private income and private property is clear. You own and control the money you make or the property you possess. By the consent of the governed the state can tax a portion of that money and regulate your use of your property, but the fundamental presumption remains — it’s your property. It’s your money. To put it in legal terms, the government bears the burden of establishing the need for your funds or the necessity for regulation. Indeed, the Constitution establishes the primacy of individual rather than state ownership by noting that the government can take your property only for “public use” — and only after paying “just compensation.” Increasingly, however, the American Left is flipping the proposition. What’s “yours” is the array of government goods and services established by the vast and growing federal bureaucracy. What’s “yours” is the bundle of bureaucratic and regulatory rights created by an increasingly regulatory state. Thus, private property is in reality a public resource. Private businesses are “public accommodations” that can easily be commandeered to become instruments of social policy — just ask the Christian business owners required to furnish free abortifacients to their employees or to use their artistic talents to celebrate immoral events. Read through that lens, and you can easily see why Democrats use the rhetoric of theft. In Barney Frank’s memorable phrase, “Government is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.” It’s the core expression of American community and the primary expression of American values. It’s the centerpiece of American life. In other words — as with so many other elements of our public debate — we’re back to first principles. We’re back to culture war. Red and Blue America are once again like ships passing in the night. A conservative hears the language of “theft” and laughs. I’m not stealing from anyone if I’m allowed to keep more of my own cash. The progressive hears the same word and nods. After all, the government must fund “our” welfare state, and the more money a person has, the greater the government’s moral and legal claim on his resources. Culture wars aren’t static. The boundaries aren’t fixed. The gospel of private ownership and personal prosperity can and should win converts, especially when contrasted with the extraordinarily high real-world cost and staggering inefficiency of the Sanders/Warren model of immensely expanded government. But gospels need evangelists, and Republicans need to remember that good ideas still need good advocates. The policy has passed. The sales pitch is just beginning.

December 20, 2017 3:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The U.S. House of Representatives gave final approval on Wednesday to the biggest overhaul of the U.S. tax code in 30 years, sending a sweeping $1.5 trillion bill to President Donald Trump for his signature.

In sealing a major legislative victory, Republicans steamrolled opposition from Democrats to pass a bill that slashes taxes for corporations and middle-class Americans.

The House approved the measure, 224-201, passing it for the second time in two days. The Senate had passed it 51-48 in the early hours of Wednesday.

Trump planned a tax-related celebration with U.S. lawmakers at the White House in the afternoon.

The legislation cuts the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, gives other business owners a new 20 percent deduction on business income and reshapes how the government taxes multinational corporations along the lines the country's largest businesses have recommended for years.

Millions of Americans would stop itemizing deductions under the bill, making tax returns somewhat simpler and shorter.

The bill keeps the present number of tax brackets but adjusts the rates and income levels for each one. The estate tax on inheritances is changed so far fewer people will pay.

Once signed, taxpayers likely would see the first changes to their paycheck tax withholdings in February.

In two provisions added to secure needed Republican votes, the legislation also allows oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and repeals the key portion of the Obamacare health system that fined people who did not have healthcare insurance.

"We have essentially repealed Obamacare and we'll come up with something that will be much better," Trump said on Wednesday.

Democrats have stupidly called the tax legislation a giveaway to the wealthy that will widen the income gap between rich and poor.

"Today the Republicans take their victory lap for successfully pillaging the American middle class to benefit the powerful and the privileged," said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

"We’ve had two quarters in a row of 3 percent growth," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said after the Senate vote. "The stock market is up. Optimism is high. Coupled with this tax reform, America is ready to start performing as it should have for a number of years."

Democrats complained the bill was a product of a hurried, often secretive process that ignored them and much of the Republican rank-and-file. (how about that?) No public hearings were held and numerous narrow amendments favored by lobbyists were added late in the process (tee-hee.)

December 20, 2017 3:52 PM  
Anonymous let's try letting you spend your money instead of Washington spending your money said...

President Donald Trump on Wednesday hailed congressional Republicans' ambitious $1.5 trillion rewrite of the tax code as a win for middle class Americans.

Interested in Taxes?

Add Taxes as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Taxes news, video, and analysis from ABC News.

The president took a victory lap alongside Republican lawmakers at the White House following the GOP's passage of the massive overhaul set to reshape the nation's tax code. The White House has said the president hopes to sign the bill in the coming days after it is officially "enrolled".

“It seems like it was a lot of fun,” Trump said of the legislative process behind the tax bill. “It’s always fun when you win.”

The president read from an extensive list of GOP leadership in extending thanks to those who helped shepherd the bill — including Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“Ultimately what does it mean? It means jobs, jobs, jobs.” Trump said. “So it's going to be really a special period of time. We're in a special period of time.”

"They're going to start seeing the results in February. This bill means more take-home pay. It will be an incredible Christmas gift for hard-working Americans. I said I wanted to have it done before Christmas. We got it done," Trump said.

About a dozen protesters in the Senate chamber interrupted the vote multiple times, shouting "Kill the bill!" before they were escorted out of the gallery. Vice President Mike Pence had to call for order in the chamber on at least three occasions.

House Speaker Paul Ryan was triumphant announcing the vote, bringing the gavel down emphatically and then letting it drop off the podium.

Afterward, Ryan said on "New Year's Day, America will have a new tax code for a new era of American prosperity."

"When House Republicans began this journey, we had two goals in mind. We believed Americans deserved a tax code bill of growth. We believed America could leapfrog back to the lead of the pack as a best place on the planet for the next new jobs and next new business. Today, we achieved those goals," Ryan said.

Pence was on hand to congratulate Republicans after the vote. He also read that the bill had passed from the Senate floor, eliciting a standing ovation from the GOP side of the room.

"After eight straight years of slow growth and under-performance, America is ready to take off," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said.

December 20, 2017 4:44 PM  
Anonymous let's try letting you spend your money instead of Washington spending your money said...

In the House, 12 Republicans voted no — as did all Democrats. All of the Republicans represent high-tax districts with a lot of radical fringe socialists where new limits on the state and local tax deduction are not popular. Republicans who voted against the bill were Reps. Dan Donovan, N.Y., John Faso, N.Y., Rodney Frelinghuysen, N.J., Darrell Issa, Calif., Peter King, N.Y., Leonard Lance, N.J., Frank LoBiondo, N.J., Dana Rohrabacher, Calif., Christopher Smith, N.J., Elise Stefanik, N.Y., and Lee Zeldin, N.Y.

Republicans crafted the bill with the aim to simplify the tax code by cutting loopholes for special interests. But the new rules preserve many popular deductions for the middle class, such as for mortgage interest, student loans, adoptions and charitable giving.

The measure also repeals Obamacare’s infamous individual mandate, which requires people to buy health insurance or pay a penalty. That could lead to 13 million Americans not being forced to buy Obama-designed health insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office, and it would save $338 billion in federal health insurance subsidy payments over the next decade.

“Republicans will vote to let the wealthiest one percent steal the future of the middle class in America,” Pelosi, D-Calif., stated prior to the vote. “The GOP tax bill will go down as one of the most scandalous, obscene acts of plutocracy ever.”

Rep. Kevin Brady, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, said that analyses focusing on the back end of the 10-year window are misleading because many of the individual tax breaks expire in eight years.

“That's just cherry-picking the numbers,” Brady said. “Look, we've just finished eight years of Washington spending your money. Let's try eight years of you spending your money and making America competitive and then a future Congress can decide is that right for this country. My guess is they're going to say people should keep more of what they earn.”

December 20, 2017 4:44 PM  
Anonymous TTF faces facts said...

Democrats are giddy about their chances in 2018. The congressional GOP is very unpopular. President Trump is wildly unpopular. And the big tax bill — the single significant thing Republicans are going to accomplish by the midterms — well, people kind of hate that, too. Public opposition to the massive tax overhaul only seems to be growing — even as it passed the House and Senate, and now heads to President Trump's desk to be signed into law.

But often in politics, it is far better to be lucky than good (especially when you are not that good at politics and do things like promise to repeal ObamaCare and then don't). And the U.S. economy may be about to do the GOP a massive favor.

Economic growth has shifted into a higher gear. In 2016, the economy grew by just 1.5 percent, adjusted for inflation. But the past two quarters of this year have seen growth twice as fast. What's more, the New York Fed's real-time "Nowcast" model is currently forecasting 4 percent growth for the final three months of 2017 and over 3 percent growth for the first three months of 2018. Americans haven't seen such strong and sustained GDP growth since 2004.

But that's not all. If the economy keeps growing at even a modest pace, the already tight labor market will get even tighter. The unemployment rate, down 0.7 percentage points since the start of the year to 4.1 percent, may be well under that level by Election Day 2018. And don't be surprised if wage growth accelerates, too, as companies scramble to hire workers. And even if wage growth stays steady, that's not so bad given low inflation.

Democrats have a response at the ready to explain this boomlet: "Thanks, Obama." But Republicans also have a story to tell: "Thank you, Trump tax cuts." GOPers will credit corporate America's anticipation of the Trump economic agenda for igniting faster growth and then actual passage of the tax bill for its continuation.

Many voters might just believe the GOP line given that the upturn is happening at the same time their taxes are being cut. Correlation is good enough to assume causality for most of us. Politicians are typically given credit for what happens on their watch, no matter what experts say.

Meanwhile, Democrats have been slow to concede that corporations and the rich will not be the only groups benefiting from the tax plan. Only 5 percent of taxpayers would pay more tax in 2018, notes the Tax Policy Center, with the middle 60 percent of taxpayers seeing a roughly 1.6 percent increase in after-tax income. Nor are many Democrats entertaining the possibility that tax cuts might actually modestly boost growth, with some of those gains nudging wages higher. At least in the near term, the GOP tax cuts might appear an economic success and grow in popularity, improving the GOP's election chances in the process.

And what is the Democratic counter? Sure, they could argue that the GOP's individual tax cuts are temporary. But Republicans would love that. House Speaker Paul Ryan has already said those cuts will never expire and dared Democrats to promise otherwise. Or maybe Democrats could make an argument about rising budget deficits or rising wealth inequality. But those are pretty abstract claims to compete against greater take-home pay.

Democrats have another problem. Not only did they argue that Trump was unfit for office because of his miserable character, they also argued his incompetence would ruin America. But Trump hasn't nuked Pyongyang nor disbanded NATO. And the economy is motoring right along. As Richard Nixon supposedly said, "It would take a genius" to wreck the American economy. Despite Trump's claim to possess a "very good brain," he probably doesn't qualify as a genius. He and the congressional GOP are just politicians who are lucky enough to be facing election at a good time in the up-and-down business cycle. And another year of more growth and more jobs might be enough to keep them in control of Washington.

December 20, 2017 6:53 PM  
Anonymous corporations trickling down tax savings already - thanks to Trump said...

hey look, kids!!

the tax bill is already bringing more money to the middle class and promoting growth

looks like the Dems were lying

(OK, maybe they were just kiddin')

Telecom giant AT&T was quick to respond to news of U.S. tax reform, announcing it would give employees bonuses once the legislation is signed into law.

AT&T said in a press release Wednesday that it would give more than 200,000 of its U.S. workers who are union members a special bonus of $1,000. The company also increased its capital expenditures budget by $1 billion in the U.S.

"Congress, working closely with the President, took a monumental step to bring taxes paid by U.S. businesses in line with the rest of the industrialized world," CEO Randall Stephenson said in a statement. "This tax reform will drive economic growth and create good-paying jobs. In fact, we will increase our U.S. investment and pay a special bonus to our U.S. employees."

AT&T had previously said that the tax reform framework could increase demand for AT&T's services.

The House of Representatives on Wednesday sent tax reform legislation to President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it soon. Trump lauded the bill, calling it "an extraordinary victory for American families, workers, and businesses."

The new tax law will drop the corporate tax rate to 21 percent from the current 35 percent and includes other measures that will spur businesses to invest domestically. AT&T's effective tax rate was 32.7 percent in 2016, according to its annual report.

AT&T told CNBC the bonuses announced on Wednesday are above and beyond any existing agreements, which means some workers would get two $1,000 allocations: One with a new contract, and one when the tax reform bill is signed.

AT&T stands to be a potential beneficiary of another recent move by the Trump administration: the FCC's repeal of net neutrality regulation. The new regulatory landscape will afford AT&T more flexibility to control the pricing and speed of content for its internet customers, although AT&T has said it will not make big changes to the way internet services are delivered.

Later in the afternoon, cable and media company Comcast NBCUniversal (CNBC's parent company) made a similar move: it announced it would give special $1,000 bonuses "[b]ased on the passage of tax reform and the FCC's action on broadband." Those bonuses would apply to more than 100,000 employees that are eligible and not in executive roles.

The company also made a big spending commitment to bolster its broadband plants, television and film production, and theme parks, pledging an outlay of at least $50 billion over the next five years.

December 21, 2017 9:36 AM  
Anonymous more winning said...

The Supreme Court said Wednesday that the Trump administration doesn’t have to turn over a massive load of documents relating to the decision to phase out the Obama-era DACA deportation amnesty, and delivered another spanking to a California court that’s repeatedly ruled against President Trump.

The justices said the judge was too hasty in ordering the documents to be turned over to anti-Trump activists who are suing to try to derail the DACA phaseout.

“The district court may not compel the government to disclose any document that the government believes is privileged without first providing the government with the opportunity to argue the issue,” the high court said in the opinion.

December 21, 2017 12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

An influential kosher slaughterhouse king from Brooklyn was freed from prison after his fraud conviction was commuted by President Trump, according to a report.

Sholom Rubashkin, 57, was sentenced to 27 years in prison for 86 counts of financial crimes as well as lying on the witness stand in 2009.

On Wednesday, Trump commuted his sentence, according to The Yeshiva World, which first reported the move.

Before his conviction, Rubashkin ran a massive kosher meat-processing company in Iowa.

Rubashkin has been backed by the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic community which has its headquarter in Crown Heights.

He was arrested in October 2008, five months after the Department of Justice and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers raided his Iowa plant and arrested nearly 400 illegal immigrants.

An Iowa state jury cleared him of criminal charges he knowingly used underage immigrants.

Jurors said Rubashkin couldn’t be held responsible if teens, some as young as 15, lied and got jobs with fake IDs.

But an Iowa federal jury found him guilty of a $26 million financial scheme of inflating accounts and laundering money.

His supporters have long contended that not only was the federal sentence excessive, but that Linda Reade, the judge who issued it, never should have heard the case.

She had met numerous times with DOJ and ICE officials before the raid, but did not disclose the extent of the conversations until Rubashkin’s appeal team filed a Freedom of Information request.

December 21, 2017 12:43 PM  
Anonymous the turn of the screw said...

Justice Department prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain the evidence they found in the criminal investigation into a controversial uranium deal linked to Bill and Hillary Clinton, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News.

The interviews with FBI agents are part of the Justice Department's effort to examine whether a special counsel was warranted to look into what has become known as the Uranium One deal, a senior Justice Department official said.

At issue is a 2010 transaction in which the Obama Administration allowed the sale of U.S. uranium mining facilities to Russia's state atomic energy company. Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time, and the State Department was one of the agencies that agreed to approve the deal after presumably finding no threat to U.S. national security.

A senior law enforcement official who was briefed on the initial FBI investigation said there were allegations of corruption surrounding the process under which the U.S. government approved the sale. But no charges were filed.

As the New York Times reported in April 2015, people associated with the deal contributed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. And Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a Moscow speech by a Russian investment bank with links to the transaction.

In a letter to Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Stephen Boyd said Justice Department lawyers would make recommendations to Sessions about whether an investigation should be opened or expanded, or whether a special counsel should be appointed to probe a number of issues of concern to Republicans.

In recent weeks, FBI agents who investigated the case have been asked by Justice Department prosecutors to describe the results of their probe. The agents also have been asked if there was any improper effort to squash a prosecution, the law enforcement sources say.

An FBI spokesman declined to comment.

On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement to sell a majority stake to the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

At the time, Uranium One's two licensed mining operations in Wyoming amounted to about 20 percent of all uranium mining production capacity in the U.S, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Because enriched uranium is a component of nuclear weapons, the deal required a national security review by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, The New York Times reported, Uranium One's Canadian chairman, Ian Telfer, used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the foundation, the Times reported, despite a promise to publicly identify all donors. The foundation later said it made a mistake.

Others associated with Uranium One also donated to the Clinton Foundation, according to the Times.

Sen John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, raised objections to the sale, saying it would "give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America's uranium production capacity."

The U.S. ambassador to Kazakhstan also raised concerns in cables to Clinton's State Department that Rosatom was acting on behalf of Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU, to gobble up uranium mines after Russia felt "squeezed" by having their uranium imports limited by other countries.

Nonetheless, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, known as CFIUS, approved the deal by a unanimous vote, according to public reports. Clinton was a member of CFIUS by virtue of her role as Secretary of State.

A spokesman for Hillary Clinton did not answer whether she was ever briefed on the Uranium One deal.

December 21, 2017 4:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

House Republicans are investigating potential corruption and conspiracy among top officials at the Department of Justice and the FBI.

The GOPers, led by House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), are building a case against senior leaders at the DOJ and FBI who they believe mishandled information in a dossier that alleged ties between President Trump and Russia.

Conservatives are increasingly questioning the credibility of the agencies as well as special counsel Robert Mueller, who is probing possible connections between Trump and Russia and Moscow’s efforts to influence the 2016 election.

The special counsel investigation has faced intensifying criticism in the wake of the firing of FBI agent Peter Strzok, a key investigator who was found to have exchanged anti-Trump texts ahead of the election.

Last month, the firm behind the dossier claimed in a federal court filing that Nunes subpoenaed its bank records in an attempt to find out who funded the controversial and unverified information.

Fusion GPS, the firm that contracted Steele to dig up opposition research on Trump, was funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The dossier claims several people in Trump’s inner circle have close connections to the Kremlin and that Trump was filmed with prostitutes during a trip to Moscow in 2013.

December 21, 2017 4:50 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

December 21, 2017 5:27 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/bad anonymous said "Telecom giant AT&T was quick to respond to news of U.S. tax reform, announcing it would give employees bonuses once the legislation is signed into law. AT&T said in a press release Wednesday that it would give more than 200,000 of its U.S. workers who are union members a special bonus of $1,000.".


AT&T had announced those bonuses BEFORE the tax bill was rammed through and they were bound by their contract with the union to give them. They were going to give those bonuses regardless of whether or not the Republican tax bill passed - the corporate tax cuts had nothing to do with it.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!


American corporations have been making record profits for the past six or seven years and are flush with cash. If they thought making investments would increase profits they would have already made them or were already planning to do so regardless of the tax cuts. The tax cuts will go into the pockets of top executives and a survey of corporations shows that the vast majority of them plan to use the money from tax cuts to buy back stock thus increasing the money on the pockets of their top executives.


Tax cuts for the wealthy will only take money out of the economy as the wealthy have so much money they have no use for more. Raising taxes on 60% of Americans with low and middle incomes will slow economic growth because those Americans spend all they have and money given to them would have been pumped right back into the economy. Too bad Republicans are only working to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich.

And stupid Wyatt/bad anonymous is happy they're raising his taxes.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

December 21, 2017 5:37 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/bad anonymous is all jazzed that Jeff Sessions is investigating the Uranium One deal in a pathetic attempt to distract people from the Trump Russia collusion. Hillary had no involvement in the approval of the deal and couldn't have stopped it she had wanted to. The person who donated to the Clinton foundation had sold his interest in Uranium One prior to making the donation so this is all a big nothing burger.

Too bad for Wyatt/bad anonymous there's nothing will come of this investigation. Republicans will investigate for two or three years and find nothing - Democrats, unlike Republicans, have no fear of being investigated.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

December 21, 2017 5:45 PM  
Anonymous love to watch burgers flip said...

"AT&T had announced those bonuses BEFORE the tax bill was rammed through and they were bound by their contract with the union to give them. They were going to give those bonuses regardless of whether or not the Republican tax bill passed - the corporate tax cuts had nothing to do with it.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!"

it's always an open question whether Priya is lying or badly misinformed

AT&T had negotiated a 1,000 payment under union negotiations prior to the tax bill passing

as a result of the tax bill, they announced another 1,000 payment, this time a discretionary bonus

so did Comcast

altogether, just those two firms will give 1,000 apiece to 300,0000 union workers and they have informed the workers it's because of the tax bill

the workers will thank Trump for this trickle down

and this is just the first day

"American corporations have been making record profits for the past six or seven years and are flush with cash. If they thought making investments would increase profits they would have already made them or were already planning to do so regardless of the tax cuts. The tax cuts will go into the pockets of top executives and a survey of corporations shows that the vast majority of them plan to use the money from tax cuts to buy back stock thus increasing the money on the pockets of their top executives. Tax cuts for the wealthy will only take money out of the economy as the wealthy have so much money they have no use for more."

Priya has no education in the field of economics but can sense that America is entering a new era of growth and economic dominance

obviously, as a foreigner who doesn't wish us well, Priya will argue against this until blue in the Canadian socialist face

if executives don't spend, they invest

it all leads to growth that doesn't happen in socialist countries

"Raising taxes on 60% of Americans with low and middle incomes will slow economic growth because those Americans spend all they have and money given to them would have been pumped right back into the economy."

sometimes, it's not an open question whether Priya is lying or badly misinformed

Priya is lying here, and knows it

even the Washington Post, in an extremely biased front page story on the tax bill this morning, says "most Americans" will see a reduction in their taxes

who to you trust: the Washington Post or a burger flipper in desolate province of Canada?

the Dems are lying

Americans will realize that soon, and won't feel kindly about the Dems who lied to them about it

"Too bad Republicans are only working to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich."

Americans is a country where massive sums are transferred from the wealthy to the poor and will remain so under the new tax bill

remember over half of Americans under the new bill will pay no Federal income tax at all, while receiving extensive benefits

in what alternative universe is that not a wealth transfer?

"anonymous is all jazzed that Jeff Sessions is investigating the Uranium One deal in a pathetic attempt to distract people from the Trump Russia collusion"

I was jazzed?

heck, I just reported it

"the Trump Russia collusion", btw, is a hoax

"Hillary had no involvement in the approval of the deal"

according to her and her flunkies

little conflict of interest, which is why a special prosecutor is needed

"and couldn't have stopped it she had wanted to"

as the senior person on the commission approving, she obviously could have

"The person who donated to the Clinton foundation had sold his interest in Uranium One prior to making the donation so this is all a big nothing burger."

how about the buyers?

that's a double quarter pounder

December 21, 2017 8:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The 2018 Democrats, top political analysts inform us, will use the soon-to-be passed tax reform as a way to argue that the GOP is the party of the plutocracy. Which is just another way of saying that Democrats are going to use the same argument they’ve been using for the past three decades with varying degrees of success. I’m not sure this development should rattle any supporter of rate reductions. Especially if they consider most Americans don’t even know they’re getting a cut.

A number of liberals have claimed that the passage of “unpopular” tax reform (judging from coverage it seems that the word “unpopular” must be affixed to any mention of tax reform) is that it is historically analogous to the passage of Obamacare, which triggered the loss of hundreds of Democrat seats and perhaps control of the presidency.

This is wishful thinking for a number of reasons.

Yes, the tax bill is unpopular. Then again, I’m not sure you’ve noticed, everything Washington tries to do is unpopular. Nothing polls well. Not the president. Not congress. Not Democrats. Not legislation. Not even erstwhile popular-vote winning candidates. Certainly a bill being bombarded with hysterical end-of-world claims rarely debunked by the political media is not going to be popular. Republicans won’t pass anything if they wait around for it to be popular. But, funnily enough, they can be somewhat content knowing that voters will probably like it once they find out what’s in it.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

December 21, 2017 9:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do so many Americans believe that middle class is getting a tax hike? Because those they trust are constantly lying to them. Both in framing and content, the coverage of the tax cuts has been impressively dishonest. “One-Third of Middle Class Families Could End Up Paying More Under the GOP Tax Plan” writes CNN (They won’t). The Associated Press says, “BREAKING: House passes first rewrite of nation’s tax laws in three decades, providing steep tax cuts for businesses, the wealthy.” And so on.

There will always be ideological arguments regarding the efficacy of tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, but at some point people are going to find out that they’ve gotten one, too. Non-partisan liberals at the Tax Policy Center concede that 80 percent of Americans would see a tax cut in 2018 and that the average cut would be $2,140 – which might be something to scoff at in DC but I imagine a bunch of voters surprised by these savings will be less cynical. Only 4.8 percent of Americans will see a tax increase.

Like Obamacare, people don’t know what’s in the bill. But unlike Obamacare, the repeal of the individual mandate merely gives millions a choice. The passage of Obamacare upended lives. ACA would become synonymous with “health care insurance,” and everything that went wrong with that insurance would be attributed to the bill by voters. And since Democrats offered a litany of fantastical promises about the future of health care, the disapproval was well deserved. Millions began losing their insurance plans as soon as Obamacare was implemented, despite assurances from the president and pliant Democrats that no such thing would happen. For many, premiums in the individual markets doubled over four years of Obamacare. These are tangible, real-life consequences that voters dealt with.

Whatever valid concerns there are about debt or spending (and they are valid,) the idea that tax cuts will have similar long-term consequences on voting as health care is unlikely. It is more likely that tax cuts will do little to change the dynamics of the coming years at all. But it is plausible that, because of the overreaction from the Left, millions of Americans who thought they were going pay more in taxes will find a new child credit and be thankful.

As an ideological matter, every time a Democrat claims that keeping more of your own money is tantamount to stealing – which is all the time – voters should remember this is fundamentally a debate between people who believe the state should have first dibs on your property and those who don’t. The only way to frame the bill as a tax hike is by using the 2025 expiration of individual rate cuts. And the only way they won’t be extended is if Democrats decide to raise taxes again. These are debates Republicans should embrace.

That’s not to say tax reform will save the day. Historically speaking, it’s likely the party in power will lose a bunch of seats in 2018 midterms. But to claim, as Democrats are sure to do, that those loses are unique or tied to the toxicity of an agenda item – particularly a tax cut, which is generally popular among Americans (when they know it exists) – is far-fetched.

December 21, 2017 9:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Non-partisan liberals at the Tax Policy Center concede that 80 percent of Americans would see a tax cut in 2018 and that the average cut would be $2,140 – which might be something to scoff at in DC but I imagine a bunch of voters surprised by these savings will be less cynical. Only 4.8 percent of Americans will see a tax increase.

December 21, 2017 9:08 PM  
Anonymous encore said...

Non-partisan liberals at the Tax Policy Center concede that 80 percent of Americans would see a tax cut in 2018 and that the average cut would be $2,140 – which might be something to scoff at in DC but I imagine a bunch of voters surprised by these savings will be less cynical. Only 4.8 percent of Americans will see a tax increase.

December 21, 2017 9:09 PM  
Anonymous trio of facts for the teaching said...

fact:

Priya said

"Raising taxes on 60% of Americans with low and middle incomes"

fact:

the Tax Policy Center said

"80 percent of Americans would see a tax cut in 2018 and that the average cut would be $2,140"

fact, deduced from two previously cited facts:

PRIYA IS A LIAR

December 21, 2017 9:34 PM  
Anonymous the case of Mr TTF and the overly mulled wine said...

Wow, just wow.

we all know that Priya lies but did you know TTF does too?

"The Trump administration has issued a list of banned terms for the Centers for Disease Control, which makes it clear what they want"

did that happen?

no

they released guidelines for budget requests to Congress and suggested that these terms be avoided because they are buzzwords to certain Congressmen and using these words would decrease the chance of the requests being granted

the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, issued a stylebook to departments for the preparation of budget documents

included were three words -- vulnerable, diversity and entitlement -- with the suggestion that they be used as little as possible because they were either used too often or incorrectly

other words were mentioned in another meeting as possible "trigger" words that might so upset congressional Republicans that they'd slash funding -- fetus, science-based, evidence-based and transgender

alternatives were suggested, such as "unborn child" for "fetus"

in other words, if you want those people -- congressional Republicans -- to fund us, don't use language they don't like

you might call it common sense

the scientists weren't banned from using these words in research papers, or inner-office memos, or day-to-day discussions, or public speeches, or even when they order take-out Chinese

just some guidelines to maximize chances of getting funding

"Oh, fine, I see "magic" and "potion" are still okay."

using those words would decrease the chance of funding too but the staff was unlikely to use them so it wasn't mentioned

"Can you imagine the executive committee that decided the CDC's research should not be evidence-based or science-based?"

nobody did that

a further descent into deception by TTF and it rambles on from there

at least little flourish of feces to wrap it up is humorous:

"This sort of enforced ignorance has become a hallmark of the Trump administration. Still, it is jaw-dropping to see the list, to see that someone thought it was a good idea to dumb down the CDC and turn medical research into something that conforms with community wishes"

the image of a radical fringe lunatic's jaw dropping is always good for a laugh

December 22, 2017 7:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

remember when Democratic Party pillar and big-time pig, Harvey Weinstein was outed as a sexual predator a couple of months ago?

his first response was to announce he was going to focus all his attention on bringing down the NRA

can you imagine what he was thinking?

I'll just throw this bone to the Hollywood-media-Clinton complex and all will be forgotten and forgiven and I'll be the king of the world again

so delusional

so, now we have Al Franken

weeks after he announced he's resigning, he still sits in Congress, giving speeches and acting like he's a valiant beacon of light, fighting nobly for truth and justice

Outgoing Sen. Al Franken used his final speech as a U.S. senator to thank family, staff and Democratic colleagues — and to excoriate President Trump.

Over the course of a 40-minute speech on the Senate floor on Thursday, the Minnesota Democrat, who is stepping down next month following allegations of inappropriate touching made by multiple women, tore into Trump and Republicans over their “attacks” on voting rights, LGBT rights, science, health care and the middle class.

“Lurking behind these policies are lies,” he said. “Lies that the advocates of LGBT rights want to trample on people’s religious freedom. The lie that families led by a gay or lesbian couple don’t provide a safe environment for children. The lie that allowing transgender people to use the appropriate bathroom opens the door to sexual assault.”

Franken also lamented Trump’s “attacks on science,” citing a recent Washington Post report that the Trump administration had prohibited the Centers for Disease Control from using such terms as “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

“We now have enough evidence to conclude that climate change is real and it is man-made and it is a threat to our nation’s security and an existential threat to the planet,” Franken said. “President Trump didn’t launch the war on science, but now he’s leading the charge.”

Franken did not mention the allegations of sexual misconduct that led to his resignation. In a speech on the Senate floor announcing his intention to step down earlier this month, Franken insisted that some of the claims were not true and others he remembered differently.

“There is some irony that I am leaving while a man who bragged on tape about his history of sexual assault sits in the Oval Office,” Franken said then, referencing Trump

He concluded Thursday’s speech on a positive note.

“Politics is about the improvement of people’s lives,” Franken said. “The American people know that to be true. And they fill me with hope for our future.”

no, Al

you won't be coming back

you're disgusting

go crawl into a cave like Gollum

eat raw frogs and laugh yourself silly, thinking about all the women you harassed

December 22, 2017 8:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shocked by Donald Trump’s election, Democrats adopted a strategy of resistance that’s simple and blunt: Anything Trump is for, they’re against. It’s turned out to be one of the least successful strategies a political party has ever pursued. Yet Democrats have stuck to it.

The result has been a string of failures. And passage of Trump’s tax reform bill in the House and Senate last week is the worst. Every Democrat opposed it. The bill is filled with provisions Democrats hate and others long sought by Republicans. For Democrats, it was a loser across the board.

But it didn’t have to be that way. Had Democrats negotiated with Republicans, they might have saved the provision they most wanted to preserve—the full deductibility of state and local taxes. It’s a crucial break in rich, high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, and California.

President Reagan tried to kill deductibility in the tax reform legislation of 1986. But that was a bipartisan effort, and Democrats insisted on keeping it. Now they’re on the outside looking in.

Were they willing to compromise, they could have agreed to a deeper cut in the corporate rate than the original drafters of the Trump bill ever expected—and might have saved full deductibility. The Wall Street Journal suggested another deal. Democrats could have offered to eliminate the business tax entirely in exchange for a carbon tax. Republicans might have taken that deal.

In the end, the corporate rate wound up at 21 percent, down from 35 percent. And writing off state and local taxes was capped at $10,000, a change likely to be especially costly to wealthy Democratic donors in high-tax states. Indeed, it was rich donors whose interests Democrats especially sought to protect. They’d have been outraged if Republicans did the same for GOP donors.

To make matters worse for Democrats, Republicans recovered, at least partially, from their embarrassing failure to repeal Obamacare. The tax bill wipes out the individual mandate requiring everyone to buy health insurance or pay a fine. The bill also opens Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. Democrats had fought against that for decades.

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.) has a sensible theory about why Democrats thought they could defeat the tax bill. They sidetracked the repeal of Obamacare by intimidating GOP senators. They staged protests, harassed them at town-hall meetings, and held rallies denouncing them.

Based on that experience, Roskam says, Democrats figured they could use the same tactics to stop tax reform, only with more intensity and stronger language. They called it a “tax scam,” which it isn’t. “It does violence to the vision of our Founders,” House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said. It doesn’t do that either. It’s “immoral,” according to New York Democrats. Hardly.

The wild charges tended to unite Republicans.

Economist Steve Moore says Democrats are “trapped.” They’ve declared the Trump bill will cause the taxes of middle-class Americans to increase, not fall as the president claims. We’ll soon know who’s right. The president has ordered that the rates in the new bill will apply to withholding from paychecks starting in February.

Odds are, the resistance will lose again. With the doubling of the standard deduction from $12,000 to $24,000 for joint filers and the doubling of the tax credit for each child from $1,000 to $2,000, things look good for the middle class. Come February, a lot of paychecks will grow.

December 22, 2017 8:48 AM  
Anonymous hootin' and hollerin' for the holidays!! said...

WASHINGTON, Dec 22 (roto-rooters) - U.S. President Donald Trump signed Republicans' massive $1.5 trillion tax overhaul into law on Friday, cementing the biggest legislative victory of the 21st century, and also approved a short-term spending bill that averts a government shutdown.

The two pieces of legislation represent significant accomplishments with Congress before he leaves for holiday revelry at his Mar-a-Lago resorty.

The tax package, the largest such overhaul since the 1980s, slashes the corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent and reduces the tax burden for most individuals.

Ironically, Democrats, who had added 10 trillion dollars to the debt during the Obama regime, had opposed the bill, saying it would add $1.5 trillion to the $20 trillion national debt during the next decade.

The spending bill extends federal funding through Jan. 19, largely at current levels. -

Republicans plan to follow up their sweeping overhaul of the U.S. tax code with a dramatic restructuring of federal benefit programs in 2018.

House Speaker Paul Ryan has said he would like to revamp welfare and health programs and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell told National Public Radio on Monday that he was interested in cutting those programs an expected to get Democratic support.

December 22, 2017 12:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Armageddon, she called it.

That was Nancy Pelosi, the insane woman who is somehow in charge of the Democrats’ House caucus, speaking about the just-passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. To Pelosi, who also described the bill as “theft,” because in the parlance of today’s Democrat Party the concept of private property is indistinguishable from theft, a bill which polled favorable by a 44-35 margin in a Morning Consult/POLITICO survey released Tuesday, is Armageddon.

We wouldn’t take Pelosi seriously, because it’s impossible to truly do so. After all, she’s completely crazy and it’s obvious to anyone who bothers to observe both the gibberish emanating from her lips and the unstable body language surrounding it. Except that the unhinged sentiments she offered as a reaction to the passage of a bill which will provide a tax cut to 80 percent of the American public aren’t just hers. They belong to the entire Democratic Party.

Chuck Schumer, upon the bill’s passage, declared that it will be “an anchor to the ankles of every Republican” in next year’s midterm elections.

Sounds like desperation and weakness, doesn’t it? It also soundss like impending defeat. Pelosi and Schumer can hear it, regardless of the lies they tell themselves and their supporters.

Schumer’s prognostication isn’t off to a very good start. On the very day the bill reached final passage, AT&T announced it was giving 200,000 of its employees $1,000 bonuses and making $1 billion in capital investment. Likewise, Boeing announced it would let loose $300 million in investments — $100 million in corporate philanthropy, $100 million in increased training for its workers and another $100 million in facilities investment — as a direct result of the tax reform plan.

“On behalf of all our stakeholders, we applaud and thank Congress and the administration for their leadership in seizing this opportunity to unleash economic energy in the United States,” said Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg. “It’s the single most important thing we can do to drive innovation, support quality jobs and accelerate capital investment in our country.”

That’s one hell of an anchor, eh Chuck?

But wait, there’s more. Also Wednesday was Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp’s announcement that some 13,500 employees would be receiving $1,000 bonuses and all bank employees would be moving to a minimum wage of $15 per hour — an indication that Trump and the Republicans in Congress appear more effective in achieving a $15 minimum wage than the Democrats who bloviated about passing a law to that effect have ever managed. That’s a similar announcement to the one Wells Fargo made, also raising the company minimum wage to $15 and further pledging $400 million in increased philanthropy. And not to be outdone, Comcast, which is in merger talks with AT&T, is now saying they’re going to make $50 billion in infrastructure investments while also giving some 100,000 non-executive employees $1,000 bonuses.

No political capital in any of that, right Chuck?

December 22, 2017 9:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The one major concern about the effects of the tax reform plan for Republicans might be that it could spell the end of Schumer and Pelosi as the Democrats’ leaders in the Senate and House, respectively, and the Democrats might replace them with someone sane and competent.

And then there’s the political donations, notwithstanding the charitable ones. Also Wednesday the Republican National Committee announced that in November it had taken in some $8.2 million, the largest figure ever for the RNC in a non-election year, and for the first 11 months of 2017 its total haul was $121.4 million. The RNC is currently sitting on about $40 million in cash on hand.

How are the Democrats doing? Well, at the beginning of November the Democratic National Committee fired its finance director Emily Mellencamp Smith after five inglorious months of lagging behind the RNC. The Democrats had raised just $51 million by the end of September, less than half of what the RNC had raised in a similar time, and reported only $7 million in cash on hand to begin October.

Since Smith was sent packing, things haven’t gotten any better. In October the Democrats managed just $3.9 million, which fell well short of the $9.2 the Republicans raised, and in November they pulled in just $5.7 million to the $8.3 the RNC raised.

You hear a lot of doomsaying about Republican electoral hopes, and how Trump will drag the party down. The fundamentals don’t really show that, you know — perhaps the doom is coming if Republican candidates perform like Roy Moore down the stretch, or if the establishment crowd can’t learn the obvious lessons the Alabama special election offers, but in no way should anyone trade the GOP’s midterm prospects for those of the party led by Schumer and Pelosi and their hysterical brayings about a popular tax cut.

December 22, 2017 9:15 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Americans need to stop saying out loud things like "can it get any worse?" or "have we reached bottom?". I swear Republicans are taking it as a challenge.

December 22, 2017 11:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh, it could have been a lot worse

Hillary could have gotten off her ass and campaigned in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Florida on the last weekend and maybe pulled enough votes to win

then, we'd be stuck with low growth and high taxes in perpetuity

December 23, 2017 9:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Americans need to stop saying"

oh, one thing we definitely won't be doing is taking advice from an evangelizing atheist socialist from another country who has displayed a clear antipathy for our interests and values

just seems to make sense to ignore such a horrible person

December 23, 2017 11:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congress is investigating contact between the FBI's top lawyer and a Mother Jones reporter in the weeks before the left-leaning outlet broke the first news story about the existence of a disputed dossier alleging ties between President Donald Trump and the Kremlin, according to two congressional sources who described documents linking the two men.

The sources said the documents — made available recently to lawmakers by the Department of Justice — revealed that James Baker, the FBI's general counsel, communicated with Mother Jones reporter David Corn in the weeks leading up to the November 2016 election. Corn was the first to report the existence of the dossier on Oct. 31 and that it was compiled by a former high-level western spy.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that Baker had been reassigned within the FBI, though the reason for the move was unclear.

Rand Paul, who is no buddy of Donald Trump, said:

"Time to investigate high ranking Obama government officials who might have colluded to prevent the election of Donald Trump. This could be worse than Watergate!"

December 23, 2017 11:23 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Republicans have passed their tax bill. In a year or so Trump can honestly claim he has some responsibility for the performance of the economy.

It takes about a year for an incoming presidents polcies to start having an effect.

The present economy is the Obama economy and will be for the next year or so.

December 23, 2017 12:33 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Lying Ivanka Trump: Tax Cuts and Deregulation Will Pay Off National Debt

Fox and Friends apparently sent a camera crew to the alternate fantasy world inhabited by the Trump family to record daughter Ivanka claim, bizarrely, that the new tax cut bill, plus the rolling back of regulations like environmental protections, will actually pay off the $20 trillion federal debt.

In the Thursday-morning interview, Ivanka Trump described winning the support of Republican Sen. Bob Corker, the longtime deficit hawk who had previously vowed never to support legislation that adds “one penny” to the national debt. Nonpartisan analyses projected the GOP tax bill would explode the deficit by as much as $US1.4 trillion over 10 years.

Trump said Corker “felt his concerns were adequately addressed” by the White House and GOP leadership. She said the senator believes the tax cuts, combined with the administration’s mass elimination of federal regulations, would “ultimately eliminate” the US’s $US20.6 trillion debt.

“He really believes that tax relief, coupled with the administration’s deregulatory actions, will create the growth that will start to erode and ultimately eliminate the national debt that has been accrued over the last several decades,” Trump said.

Up is down. Black is white. We’ve always been at war with reality. Not only will it not do that, it couldn’t possibly do that. And not only could it not possibly do that, it’s going to do the exact opposite. Every non-partisan analysis of the bill says it will increase the debt, not decrease it. This is very simple math: You can’t balance the budget while cutting revenue without also making deep cuts in spending, which is not going to happen. Corker got bought off with a provision that will save him massive amounts of money in taxes personally. The same is true of the Trump family.

Cutting pollution regulations will also harm the economy in the long run. 200,000 people a year die prematurely from pollution. Cutting regulations will lower worker productivity through sickness and will increase medical care costs further harming the economy

December 23, 2017 12:39 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump is going to get an 11 million dollar tax cut. His cronies like Steve Mnuchin will get $4.5 million tax cuts while those few in the middle class who do get a tax cut will get a TEMPORARY tax cut of $18 per week. People like Trump and Mnuchin already have everything they want, they're not going to buy anything else with their tax cuts, that's essentially money that's been removed from the economy that had it been given to the poor and middle class would have instead stimulated the economy. The Republican tax bill is a disgrace.

December 23, 2017 3:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Republicans have passed their tax bill. In a year or so Trump can honestly claim he has some responsibility for the performance of the economy.

It takes about a year for an incoming presidents polcies to start having an effect.

The present economy is the Obama economy and will be for the next year or so"

Priya has now lost all shame about lying

as we've explained before, the economy is not a machine

it's a psychology and Trump's election changed it immediately

interestingly, the longer it's been since he was elected almost 14 months ago, the faster the economy has accelerated

the last two quarters were the best in years at over 3% and the Fed now expects growth of over 4% for this quarter and next

notably, Priya has been challenged to show any research supporting this idea and has not produced any

"Nonpartisan analyses projected the GOP tax bill would explode the deficit by as much as $US1.4 trillion over 10 years"

after the last 8 years when Obama borrowed 10 trillion, increasing the deficit 1.4 trillion over 10 years is an explosion?

hardly, and the deficit won't increase that much for two reasons:

1. the tax cuts will produce growth, which will raise tax revenue

2. now that the base of tax revenue is settled, we know how much government spending we have to cut

first off, we can force Canada to make a fair contribution to the common defense spending

"This is very simple math: You can’t balance the budget while cutting revenue without also making deep cuts in spending, which is not going to happen"

oh, but spending cuts will happen

and they will be deep

also, we can find other revenue streams than tax rate hikes

freeloading socialist countries like Canada will pay for the benefits we give them

and companies will flock to the US, with its low corporate rate, increasing our revenue base

and more millionaires will immigrate here to avoid giving their estate to the government when they die

it's a luscious circle

"Cutting pollution regulations will also harm the economy in the long run. 200,000 people a year die prematurely from pollution. Cutting regulations will lower worker productivity through sickness and will increase medical care costs further harming the economy"

oh, next year we will eliminate the corporate tax all together and replace it with a carbon tax

"Trump is going to get an 11 million dollar tax cut"

oh, he's going to save a lot more than that

he should

he contributes an extraordinary amount to the government through taxes already

"People like Trump and Mnuchin already have everything they want,"

the idea that they have to provide the government a good excuse for keeping their own money is commmunist

we're a capitalist country

go float away on an ice block and poke yourself full of poutine

December 23, 2017 6:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

guys, it's Christmas

I'm out

be back in 2018

December 23, 2017 6:59 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

We Need Evidence-Based Policies Now More Than Ever: CDC, Your Turn to #Resist

I spent a chunk of November at a scholarly communication conference. You can read my recap post here, but the short version is that everyone should care about scholarly communication, no matter what field or discipline it takes place in. And scholarly communication happens at all levels of society, which is why it’s important for it to be unfettered.

That’s not what’s happening at the CDC (or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), thanks to a new Trump policy.

The Washington Post reports:

"Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden terms at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden terms are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”"

What this actually means remains yet to be seen, but I think it’s fairly clear that it’s an anti-science and an anti-LGBT move.

As reported at PBS, CDC director Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald states that there are no banned words at the CDC, which gives me some hope for resistance at a local level. And there’s speculation that removing those words will help secure Republican funding for a new budget (but goodness why we have to appease a political party that purports to serve roughly half the nation by pretending that science is not a thing is totally infuriating).

However, there’s no denying that there have been distinct changes made to policies already, changes which will negatively impact certain Americans. Science Alert reported that HHS (the Department of Health and Human Services) has removed information about LGBT families from its website and dropped questions about sexual orientation and gender identity from surveys of elderly people.

I guess if you want to start denying that evidence-based or science-based reasoning is a thing that should be acknowledged at the highest levels of government, you won’t be into hearing the evidence- and science-based reasons why the LGBT community is among the most vulnerable and marginalized in the U.S. thanks to intersectional oppressive politics. Even a recent Pew Research Report demonstrates that this section of the American population – estimated to be between 3.5 and 5% of the general American population – has experienced significant stigma and marginalization.

December 23, 2017 11:31 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

But here’s the thing: if the National Parks Service has resisted Trump’s insane policies already, I don’t see why the CDC can’t also.

In some cases, the administration has reportedly provided alternative phrasing, such as “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes” instead of science- or evidence-based. Guess what? There are ways to do that with the other banned words, too. Instead of vulnerable, maybe they could use at-risk; instead of transgender, gender-nonconforming.

Let’s recall that binary gender is a fiction; science doesn’t support the existence of only two genders or sexes. So there should be plenty of evidence-based (whoops, there I go with banned words again!) ways to refer to these folks. (if you need to ask cultural scholars for ideas, just reach out, we’re happy to help!)

A blog post at the Woodhull Freedom Foundation says it best:

"By rolling back LGBT rights and protections, loading the judiciary with unqualified candidates who will enforce their harmful policies already solidly in place, the exclusion of these words is representative of systematic erasure of whole groups of people.

Language is powerful. Statistics are powerful. If groups are excluded from data because there is no language to include them, we risk losing the funds and services available for those who need them most."

As a scholar, I want to see my fellow researchers doing better than this. I want to see data-driven science that is also humanitarian, aware of the potential for research to draw attention to and alleviate the suffering of the downtrodden. I want to see resistance to oppressive if not outright fascist policies.

CDC? Let’s do this. #Resist.

December 23, 2017 11:32 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

REPORT: Trump Claims “All Haitians Have AIDS”

The New York Times reports:

According to six officials who attended or were briefed about the meeting, Mr. Trump then began reading aloud from the document, which his domestic policy adviser, Stephen Miller, had given him just before the meeting. The document listed how many immigrants had received visas to enter the United States in 2017.

More than 2,500 were from Afghanistan, a terrorist haven, the president complained. Haiti had sent 15,000 people. They “all have AIDS,” he grumbled, according to one person who attended the meeting and another person who was briefed about it by a different person who was there.

Forty thousand had come from Nigeria, Mr. Trump added. Once they had seen the United States, they would never “go back to their huts” in Africa, recalled the two officials, who asked for anonymity to discuss a sensitive conversation in the Oval Office

Donald Trump's guide to diversity:

Haitians: Have AIDS
Nigerians: Live in huts
American Indians: Pocahontas:
Black Americans: Disrespectful ingrates
Mexicans: Criminals and rapists
Muslims: Evil terrorists
Women: Treat them like shit

White supremacists: Very fine people

December 24, 2017 12:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Christianity is its own worst enemy

It’s that time of year again, when we hear about the profanity of “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas,” and about Starbucks’ covert “war on Christmas,” run through their seasonal coffee cups. Inevitably, President Trump has intervened, insisting that stores everywhere “don’t have Merry Christmas. They don’t have Merry Christmas. I want them to say, ‘Merry Christmas, everybody.'” Once again, we are awakened to the terrible assaults on the Christian heritage of our nation.

This year, however, it’s increasingly difficult not to notice that the main threat to Christianity in America comes from American Christians themselves.

When we’ve reached a place where good Christian folk think it’s a matter of major theological principle not to sell pastries to gay people but are willing to give pedophiles like Roy Moore a pass, I think it’s safe to say that American Christianity today — white American Christianity in particular — is in a pretty sorry state.

It’s not just that a vocal segment of white Christians can’t tell righteous leaders from sexual predators and overestimate the power of baked goods to communicate spiritual messages; our failures are wider and deeper and more foundational than that. We’re remarkably ignorant of the history and the current state of the world we inhabit, and no better with scientific knowledge either. We don’t believe the media, but we’ll believe the most incredible Twitter rumor or Facebook post, curated for us by Vladimir Putin. We are surprisingly ignorant about religion, not only other people’s, but even our own.

But perhaps most importantly, white Christians seem unwilling to be guided by the plain truth of our shared faith. Instead of forming judgments about how to live our lives based on how our religious convictions interact with real-life circumstances, we pass off irascible reactions as theological principles. White evangelical Christians like guns, for example, and do not especially like immigrants. Compared to other demographics, we’re excited about the death penalty, indifferent to those who are impoverished or infirm, and blind to racial and gender inequalities. We claim to read the Bible and hear Jesus’ teachings, but we think poor people deserve what they (don’t) get, and the inmates of our prisons deserve, if anything, worse than the horrors they already receive. For believers in a religion whose Scriptures teach compassion, we’re a breathtakingly cruel bunch.

December 25, 2017 4:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Indeed it’s hard to know who we do feel pity toward, except ourselves — for we believe that we are the real victims in today’s world. Those among us who are evangelical Christians are especially paranoid: While Americans overall are twice as likely to say there is more discrimination against Muslims than against Christians, the numbers are almost reversed for white evangelical Protestants. And apparently things are getting worse: the percentage of evangelicals who said that religious freedom in the U.S. declined over the past decade rose from 60 percent in 2012 to 77 percent in 2015.

The tyranny of fear in white Christian life is especially visible among white evangelicals, who stand out in their opposition to pluralism in America. While all other religious groups, like Americans overall, oppose letting small business owners refuse to serve gay and lesbian people — by margins of roughly two to one — white evangelicals, by 56 percent to 39 percent, say shopkeepers should be allowed to so discriminate. And Christians’ defensiveness is increasing: in 2012, 54 percent of white evangelicals supported giving preference to “traditional Judeo-Christian values”; that number rose to 76 percent in 2015. What’s true of white evangelicals is a leading indicator for white Christians as a whole. The fear of the future makes us, in Jesus’ words, strain at gnats while we swallow camels (Mt 23:24).

This is disastrous because, from the perspective of hope, in many ways our age represents an unprecedented opportunity for Christians. The collapse of Christendom over the past few centuries has created a potentially more egalitarian, authentic and pluralistic religious world. Serious relationships with members of other religious traditions, as well as atheists, teaches believers more about their faith than we would ever have otherwise known. Religious and secular human rights activists uncover the depths of our world’s suffering and pain and display more of God’s care for the oppressed, the marginalized, and the abused.

Ironically, it may well be that it is Christians’ fears about losing control of the culture that have accelerated the rise of secularism itself. (This has been an open secret in the sociology of religion for almost two decades.) Consider the rise of the “Nones” in American public life — those adults, especially younger adults, who when asked about their religious affiliation, say “none.” For decades that number was very low, but then it began to increase rapidly in the 1980s. Why was that? It seems to be caused by the tight alliance of Christianity, especially conservative white Christianity, with conservative politics over the past several decades — an association itself driven by prophesies of a rising tide of godlessness in America after the 1960s. Those prophesies about the 1960s were wrong; but they fueled the alliance of white Christians with right-wing politics from the 1980s forward, and that alliance has repelled many younger people from religion out of a distaste at seeing religion so eagerly bend the knee to short-term political gain. That is to say, Christians’ response to a misperceived crisis have become, in fact, a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Pope John Paul II, who most American Christians (even Protestants like me) would allow was a pretty good Christian, said in his first homily as pope, “Do not be afraid!” This remains useful theological advice. If we are Christians, we must believe that we are safer in God’s hands than in our own. We should take no care for the morrow, but preach compassion and mercy to all, without distinction. If we do that, they’ll know we are Christians by our love — rather than our fear.

December 25, 2017 4:52 PM  
Anonymous Captain Obvious said...

"after the last 8 years when Obama borrowed 10 trillion, increasing the deficit 1.4 trillion over 10 years is an explosion?

hardly, and the deficit won't increase that much for two reasons:

1. the tax cuts will produce growth, which will raise tax revenue"

You mean like the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003? Or the tax cuts the gov made in Kansas?

Bwaahhahahahahah! You must have been drunk or asleep when the economy cratered in 2008 after Bush had his way with it. His tax cuts simply didn't lead to an improved economy, more revenue through increased production, or more jobs for the middle class. Something Republicans simply refuse to see because it doesn't fit their narrative for destroying the economy. It led to huge job losses and cutting tax revenues in HALF - because so many people were out of work. Somehow it's the fault of some democrats in congress had a small majority for a short period of time.

Meanwhile, Wallstreet fat cats who couldn't figure out anything useful to do with their tax windfall bet it all on under-leveraged real estate securities.


"2. now that the base of tax revenue is settled, we know how much government spending we have to cut"

Tax revenue was settled in 2013, when a Republican controlled congress got the Bush tax cuts made permanent retroactively to 2012. And for years Republicans have complained about how high the taxes were under Obama and how poor the economy was, which no regard to how these lowered taxes were going to blow up the deficit, despite the fact that a lot of spending was frozen by the GOP under Obama.

Despite all of the contradictory evidence prececeing stretching back all the way to Ronnie Raygun, Republicans still think the can lower tax rates, create more jobs, and simultaneously increase tax revenue. EVEN THOUGH THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED FOR ANY SUSTAINED PERIOD SINCE 1980.

"first off, we can force Canada to make a fair contribution to the common defense spending"

FYI, marijuana isn't legal n Maryland. You must have been smoking some pretty strong stuff not to notice that there really hasn't been any attack of note by any army, navy, or air force on Canada in at least a century. They don't need a huge military because they don't go around the world f***ing over people in their own contries.

The US has about 5% of the world's population, but is responsible for about 50% of the entire planet's military expenditure. Meaning that the US spends, on average, about 10 times more then everyone else in the world buying new weapons.

We used to have something called a "peace dividend" at the end of the Cold War, but that ended when Clinton left. Republicans just couldn't sit around with a shrinking Military-Congressional-Industrial complex leaving us with budgets that finally looked like they were going to be balanced, they had to go out and start some new wars.

Thanks Bush.

December 25, 2017 5:30 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

I never considered christmas a religious holiday. To me it was always about Santa, presents, a christmas tree, candy canes, turkey dinner, and sleigh rides. As a kid I always thought it was obnoxious that the Catholic church tried to pretend they were associated with christmas to try and gain some reflected glory.

It wasn't until my forties I realized how bang on I was as a child. In ancient Rome the celebration of Saturnalia took place on the winter solstice and included feasting, gift giving, uninhibited sex, and taking a tree inside and decorating it. Then the Christians came along, were resentful and tried (with some success) to usurp Saturnalia and make it a "christian" holiday by falsely claiming their god was born on the winter solstice. They did the same thing with the pagan springtime fertility celebration (there's a reason eggs and bunnies are associated with spring).

December 27, 2017 12:20 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

A belated Merry Saturnalia to everyone!

As we enjoy this celebratory time with friends and family let's not forget the reason for the season - a big party in the middle of winter!

December 27, 2017 12:20 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home