Friday, June 22, 2018

No Hugging

It is amazing to see how far our country has sunk, essentially overnight. Where we recently opposed totalitarian states and the dictators who led them, we now find our leaders congratulating and flattering them, and doing them special favors. We have made enemies of our friends and friends of our enemies. The freedom that we once boasted of, that we were so proud of, is now just a joke -- the rule of law that preserved our freedom is reduced to whims and mob rule and bends to serve the greed of the privileged.

The story on the Mexican border is unbelievable. People coming for asylum, coming to the border and having their children taken away, families jailed. Crying babies, weeping mothers, the tragedy is unthinkable -- there is nothing more fundamental than the bond between child and mother. The President calls them animals and says they are going to "infest" our country, he implies that they are criminals, which justifies imprisoning them for wanting to come here. Now he has signed an executive order keeping families together in their cages, but nobody even knows where thousands of children are who have already been separated. These are people hoping to come into the United States for their safety, mostly, fleeing Central American countries that are madhouses of violence -- it doesn't even make the news here, crowded off the front pages by our domestic lies and depravity. The inhumanity of it all is unbelievable.

Here's what the President said last night, on Twitter:
We have to maintain strong borders or we will no longer have a country that we can be proud of – and if we show any weakness, millions of people will journey into our country.
This is a perverse way to look at the United States of America, a sad and dangerous perspective to take: this is un-American. We can be proud of a country with all kinds of people in it. Offering help to those who need it is not weakness. And this is not the worst of what he has said, not by a long shot.

But as people keep saying, the President is not the problem. The problem is that millions of Americans think this the way it should be. American Evangelical Christians are lovin' this, it is their dream come true, we are finally implementing the teachings of Jesus here on earth. Many Americans feel that those who seek to come to our promised land are some kind of vermin, not human beings, that those people deserve to have their children taken away, they deserve to live in cages. And while immigration dominates the news this week, the billionaires are pilfering the treasury in Washington, sweeping more money toward themselves, neglecting and undermining democracy with their state-sponsored white-collar crime.

I have often wondered, what is the "immigration problem," anyway? There's plenty of room, what is the problem?

I am apparently not the only one who fails to see a problem. Gallup yesterday released a poll showing that three-quarters of Americans think immigration is a good thing. That includes 65% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.

Gallup: "Just 19% of the public considers immigration a bad thing."

I am not going to comment on any specific news story today because they are coming too fast. Congress is full of Republican-on-Republican crime, they can't do anything so they blame the Democrats, and in the meantime Cabinet members are getting booed out of Mexican restaurants and why in the world are they there in the first place, fer cryin out loud? Is it a joke? Ordinary citizens cannot understand it. Are they trying to own the libs by eating Mexican food, or what? And who cares what Melania doesn't care about? It's coming too fast.

We are in the middle of a wide-spectrum multidimensional assault on decency and you cannot pick one thing and talk about it. While we were freaking out about immigrant children being shipped to human traffickers (big question: where are the girls?), Trump rescinded Obama's policy that protected the oceans, opening them up to more "industrial" uses and pollution. You can't keep up with it. Evil has taken hold and it is spreading like a wildfire on all sides. The American governing philosophy is that you're a sucker if you don't take all you can get. And ninety-nine percent of us are the suckers.

Oh, and Trump's approval rating is higher than it's been since he was first elected.

You know what ripped it for me? The no-hugging policy. Not only did you take children away from their mothers, which is -- you would think -- about the cruelest thing you can do to both of them. But the official policy was that adult caregivers were not allowed to hug the children, and that children were not allowed to hug one another.

There is nothing more basic than a hug. A hug does not actually solve your problems but it connects you with another living person, you can feel the life in their body and know that you are not alone in this godforsaken dystopia. And the Trump administration would not allow the one simple, free thing that would make a child feel better. That tells you what motivates them; it is not fear of terrorism or crime, it is the fear that these people who are coming to our border are real human beings and not insects, not animals. And more than anything, it is fear of appearing weak.

264 Comments:

Anonymous your humble servant said...

problem is, you don't know what to believe anymore

and it's more the fault of the mainstream liberal media than Trump

if these people are merely "asylum seekers", as Jim says, why are they detained and not just turned away?

is it because they illegally enter the country and then seek asylum?

if so, what's wrong with arresting them, when they've broken the law?

and when have we ever jailed criminals with their whole family?

"TEGUCIGALPA, June 21 (Reuters) - The Honduran toddler pictured sobbing in a pink jacket before U.S. President Donald Trump on an upcoming cover of Time magazine was not separated from her mother at the U.S. border, according to a man who says he is the girl's father.

The powerful original photograph, taken at the scene of a border detention by Getty Images photographer John Moore, became one of the iconic images in the flurry of media coverage about the separation of families by the Trump administration.

Dozens of newspapers and magazines around the globe published the picture, swelling the tide of outrage that pushed Trump to back down Wednesday and say families would no longer be separated.

"My daughter has become a symbol of the ... separation of children at the U.S. border. She may have even touched President Trump's heart," Denis Valera told Reuters in a telephone interview.

Valera said the little girl and her mother, Sandra Sanchez, have been detained together in the Texas border town of McAllen, where Sanchez has applied for asylum, and they were not separated after being detained near the border.

Honduran deputy foreign minister Nelly Jerez confirmed Valera's version of events.

Varela said he was awestruck and pained when he first saw the photo of his crying daughter on TV. "Seeing what was happening to her in that moment breaks anyone's heart," he said.

The photo was used on a Facebook fundraiser that drew more than $17 million dollars in donations from close to half a million people for the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (RAICES), a Texas-based nonprofit that provides legal defense services to immigrants and refugees.

Sanchez and her daughter had left Puerto Cortes, a major Honduran port north of the capital city, Tegucigalpa, without telling Valera or the couple's three other children, he said.

He said he imagined that Sanchez left with the little girl for the United States, where she has family, in search of better economic opportunities."

June 22, 2018 9:32 AM  
Anonymous 1,000 words said...

Here is the story of the picture of the little girl

June 22, 2018 9:48 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

I saw it during the election campaign, the rise of Trump is like the rise of Hitler. And the longer his presidency goes on the more Hitler like he becomes.

June 22, 2018 10:12 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Plus the propaganda of Hitler. Trump pumps this up as a current disaster when illegal immigration is at a 46 year low.

June 22, 2018 10:13 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Nunes is obstructing justice...

Neither Stone nor Caputo mentioned the meeting when they testified last year before the House Intelligence Committee about their contacts with Russians—a failure that both men have attributed to the fact that they had forgotten about it.

“And so to say that there was ‘failure of memory’ by both individuals to recall this meeting, I just don’t buy it,” Swalwell told Yahoo News’s chief investigative correspondent, Michael Isikoff, and editor in chief, Daniel Klaidman.

“I think they just lied through their teeth to protect the fact that they were willing and eager to take a meeting with Russians who were offering dirt,” he added.

Swalwell added that he and other committee Democrats, led by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the ranking member on the panel, have pushed to have transcripts of closed door testimony of Stone and Caputo sent to special counsel Robert Mueller, but they have been blocked from doing so by the committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.

June 22, 2018 10:13 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump campaign data operation had stolen Clinton emails ‘more than a month’ before WikiLeaks: bombshell report

The company that ran then-candidate Donald Trump’s data operation in 2016 reportedly obtained Hillary Clinton’s stolen emails more than a month before WikiLeaks published them.

In a column for the British magazine Spectator, BBC correspondent Paul Wood revealed that Cambridge Analytica, the now-defunct company which was in charge of microtargeting voters for the Trump campaign, was in possession of Clinton’s emails at least a month before WikiLeaks was known to have them.

“The (now shuttered) British company did the Trump campaign’s data,” Wood explained. “Its speciality was ‘microtargeting’: individual messages tailored to individual voters, delivered by email, Facebook and Twitter.”

“The US intelligence agencies believe that Russian internet ‘troll factories’ were also pushing out pro-Trump propaganda on social media: sometimes fake news, sometimes real news, such as the hacked contents of Clinton’s emails,” he continued. “The question is whether this was done in coordination with the Trump campaign.”

Wood said that he had information from an “American lawyer” who knew that Cambridge Analytica was in possession of the emails, which U.S. intelligence agencies later determined were stolen by Russian hackers.

An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election. They had had the Clinton emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks: ‘What should I do?’ Take this to [special counsel Robert Mueller], the lawyer replied.

More at the link

June 22, 2018 10:15 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

National Enquirer Execs Sent Trump Stories To Michael Cohen In Advance Of Publication For His Approval

June 21, 2018 News, Trump Corruption

The Washington Post reports:

During the presidential campaign, National Enquirer executives sent digital copies of the tabloid’s articles and cover images related to Donald Trump and his political opponents to Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen in advance of publication, according to three people with knowledge of the matter — an unusual practice that speaks to the close relationship between Trump and David Pecker, chief executive of American Media Inc., the Enquirer’s parent company.

Although the company strongly denies ever sharing such material before publication, these three individuals say the sharing of material continued after Trump took office. “Since Trump’s become president and even before, [Pecker] openly just has been willing to turn the magazine and the cover over to the Trump machine,” said one of the people with knowledge of the practice. During the campaign, “if it was a story specifically about Trump, then it was sent over to Michael, and as long as there were no objections from him, the story could be published,” this person added.

June 22, 2018 10:16 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Meanwhile, in other shitty news...

With our attention focused on Trump's horrific treatment of immigrant children House Republicans quietly unveiled their 2019 budget proposal that calls for $537 billion in cuts to Medicare, $1.5 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, and $4 billion in cuts to Social Security over the next decade so all you "ordinary people" can pay for their tax cuts for the Super Wealthy.

Why do morons like Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous vote against their own interests? It can only be blind hate...

June 22, 2018 10:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Anonymous 1,000 words said...
Here is the story of the picture of the little girl"

I already posted an excerpt from a Reuters story. The mainstream media has misled the public. If your Post story says something otherwise, tell us what. Don't just post a link.

"JUNE 22, 2018 9:48 AM
Blogger Priya Lynn said...
I saw it during the election campaign, the rise of Trump is like the rise of Hitler. And the longer his presidency goes on the more Hitler like he becomes."

all you saw was the propaganda pieces you read

you should try reading outside your bubble

then, you might not embarrass yourself so much

remember, Dems were saying this about George W and John McCain as well

it's just part of their standard political attack repertoire

they have no more credibility than the boy who cried wolf

and Priya the Puerile has much less

"JUNE 22, 2018 10:12 AM
Blogger Priya Lynn said...
Plus the propaganda of Hitler. Trump pumps this up as a current disaster when illegal immigration is at a 46 year low."

I think he would say the disaster is a cumulative effect so the current rate is irrelevant

not saying he's right, but the Hitler crap is ridiculous

JUNE 22, 2018 10:13 AM
"Blogger Priya Lynn said...
Nunes is obstructing justice..."

you must mean the DOJ officials who have used national security as a justification to withhold fact from Congress that turn about to be about protecting individuals' misdeeds, not the country

"“I think they just lied through their teeth to protect the fact that they were willing and eager to take a meeting with Russians who were offering dirt,” he added.

Swalwell added that he and other committee Democrats, led by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the ranking member on the panel, have pushed to have transcripts of closed door testimony of Stone and Caputo sent to special counsel Robert Mueller, but they have been blocked from doing so by the committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif."

meeting with Russians to get facts about Hillary is not a crime

so, there could be no obstruction of justice, by definition

"Trump campaign data operation had stolen Clinton emails ‘more than a month’ before WikiLeaks: bombshell report

The company that ran then-candidate Donald Trump’s data operation in 2016 reportedly obtained Hillary Clinton’s stolen emails more than a month before WikiLeaks published them.

In a column for the British magazine Spectator, BBC correspondent Paul Wood revealed that Cambridge Analytica,"

isn't that the country involved in the Russia hoax dossier?

"National Enquirer Execs Sent Trump Stories To Michael Cohen In Advance Of Publication For His Approval"

not unusual to seek comment when you are planning to run a story on someone


June 22, 2018 10:49 AM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

Six months ago, Republicans in Congress joined with President Trump to redesign America’s tax code and enact sweeping tax cuts. We were determined to let families and local businesses keep more of what they earn. The new tax code was built to help American companies and workers compete and win anywhere in the world.

Now something big is happening to America’s economy. Since January, more than one million jobs have been created. This has brought claims for unemployment benefits to their lowest level since 1969, and there are now actually more job openings than people looking for work. The U.S. has gone from a nation asking “Where are the jobs?” to one that asks “Where are more workers?”

While this economic turnaround has come as a shock to most Democrats in Washington, it’s no surprise to millions of working families across America. They were overtaxed and overregulated for far too long, and the result was a decade of slow growth.

In only six months, the economy has been reinvigorated—and the best is yet to come. That’s because the new tax code leapfrogs America’s competitors abroad. The U.S. is now at the head of the pack—one of the best places on the planet to find that next job, to build that new manufacturing plant, or to set up company headquarters.

As a result, businesses of all sizes are now investing in American workers and communities. They are bringing back their dollars from overseas and investing at home again. It’s no coincidence that small-business optimism has hit its highest reported level in 35 years.

There is a new hope and a new optimism that wasn’t here before. To call it a sudden change from the sluggish Obama-era economy would be an understatement. For a decade, it was like America’s economy was going through a 25 mph zone. Now that the high taxes and uncompetitive regulations are gone, we’re on the open highway again.

Families and business owners say that they’re hopeful about their economic outlook for the first time since the Great Recession. A growing economy means real change for millions, and it’s uplifting to hear that so many people who are excited about their futures again. A Gallup poll out this week found that satisfaction with the direction the U.S. is heading has reached a 12-year high. This simply wouldn’t have happened without meaningful tax reform.

The scary thing is that Democrats want to take all of this progress away. They think Washington should keep more of families’ hard-earned money. Critics like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi continue to deny that tax reform has had any positive effects, and they have actually pledged to raise taxes. Clearly, Democrats are interested in seeing only doom and gloom.

Meantime, Republicans are finding innovative ways to keep improving the tax code to ensure it will remain competitive and pro-growth for Main Street businesses. We’re going to change the culture of Washington so the U.S. doesn’t find itself in the same situation we faced last year, with a tax code that was an anchor dragging down the economy.

Given the choice between keeping taxes high and allowing families to keep more of their money, Republicans chose—and continue to choose—the American people. Empowering families to run their own lives is at the heart of the American Dream. It’s the key to our nation’s economic success, and it’s the reason that, six months into tax reform, Americans are more hopeful about their future.

June 22, 2018 12:26 PM  
Anonymous Drip, drip, drip said...

""National Enquirer Execs Sent Trump Stories To Michael Cohen In Advance Of Publication For His Approval"

not unusual to seek comment when you are planning to run a story on someone"

Then why did the National Enquirer and its parent company American Media, Inc. "strongly den[y] ever sharing such material before publication," if it's "not unusual?

Your ignorance is showing yet again.

"Trump's control over — and Cohen's involvement in — the Enquirer's and American Media Inc.'s business is at the center of the probe into Cohen and alleged hush-money payments to Trump's accusers....

...investigators are clearly interested in the relationship between Cohen and AMI, with the Wall Street Journal reporting this week that they have subpoenaed AMI for records related to the McDougal payment. It is believed this pertains to the broadening criminal case against Cohen....[who] may be interested in flipping on Trump — which is really the big, broader question in all of this. Within a day, the Journal reported Cohen is unhappy that Trump isn't footing his legal bills, CNN reported someone close to Cohen was warning Trump that Cohen has a story to tell if he flips, and Cohen conspicuously distanced himself from Trump's policy of separating families who immigrate illegally. In addition, Cohen resigned from his position as deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee — even though he didn't need to. All of this came after Cohen hired a new lawyer with ties to the same Southern District of New York office with which he would be arranging a deal.

When it comes to Trump's longtime lawyer and personal “fixer,” that's a whole lot of bad signs in a very short period of time for the president."

June 22, 2018 12:37 PM  
Anonymous Proud blue state/bluer county resident said...

Early voting surged 95 percent among Democrats this year in Montgomery County and 61 percent across the state compared to the 2014 Gubernatorial primary, according to data from the Maryland Board of Elections.

There were 31,998 early voting Democrats in the County and 170,356 statewide this year, compared to 16,443 and 105,339 respectively, during the 2014 primary.

Altogether, early voting rose 91 percent in Montgomery, to 35,963 voters, and 56 percent in Maryland, to 221,100 voters compared to 2014.

Montgomery also had the state's second biggest early voting turnout among counties, trailing only PG County (40,807) and narrowly beating Baltimore County (35,678).

But, this isn't just a Democratic story. Early voting rose 63 percent among Republicans in MoCo, to 2,917, and 40 percent across the state to 47,736.

Early voting was also up for smaller parties. Their final in Montgomery were as follows: Green (27), Libertarian (11), Other (32) and Unaffiliated (978).

June 22, 2018 1:07 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Get back to work lazy Wyatt/Regina/bad anonyomous and stop wasting your work day on the internet.

AP-NORC Poll: Americans say no to presidential self-pardons

While the popular vote losing pussy grabber falsely thinks he has the right to pardon himself for his crimes the American public overwhelmingly rejects that idea. 85 percent think it would be unacceptable for presidents to pardon themselves if charged with a crime, and 76 percent think Congress should take steps to remove a president from office if they did so.

June 22, 2018 1:41 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Swamp Person Betsy DeVos Destroying Civil Rights Policing by Education Department

Being from Michigan, I know full well how dangerous Betsy DeVos’ views on everything, especially education, are. She and her family simply don’t believe in the notion of civil rights or equality and they never have. So I’m certainly not shocked that she is busy destroying the Department of Education’s investigation of civil rights problems in public schools.

We found that, under Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, the department has scuttled more than 1,200 civil rights investigations that were begun under the Obama administration and lasted at least six months. These cases, which investigated complaints of civil rights violations ranging from discriminatory discipline to sexual violence in school districts and colleges around the country, were closed without any findings of wrongdoing or corrective action, often due to insufficient evidence.

Elizabeth Hill, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education, didn’t dispute ProPublica’s data. She maintained that the Office for Civil Rights is “as committed as ever” to vigorous civil rights enforcement…

ProPublica also found that the Office for Civil Rights has become more lenient. Under Obama, 51 percent of cases that took more than 180 days culminated in findings of civil rights violations, or corrective changes. Under the Trump administration, that rate has dropped to 35 percent.

The same thing has happened at the DOJ, where Trump and Sessions have withdrawn dozens of guidance documents on civil rights, shifted the focus of the civil rights division to look at mythical anti-Christian persecution rather than on matters of racial or gender justice, and done away with agreements with local law enforcement requiring them to stay withing the boundaries of the Constitution, particularly the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

June 22, 2018 1:42 PM  
Anonymous yeeeeooouCh!!! said...

"why did the National Enquirer and its parent company American Media, Inc. "strongly deny ever sharing such material before publication," if it's "not unusual?

Your ignorance is showing yet again."

your question is ignorant

there could be many reasons

"Trump's control over — and Cohen's involvement in — the Enquirer's and American Media Inc.'s business is at the center of the probe into Cohen and alleged hush-money payments to Trump's accusers...."

unless the hush money is to conceal illegal activity, it's not "alleged"

that's not a criminal, or impeachable, act

"...investigators are clearly interested in the relationship between Cohen and AMI,"

investigators are clearly interested in any straw they can grasp at

that would indicate they've found nothing at all

"It is believed this pertains to the broadening criminal case against Cohen"

what's the crime?

"....[who] may be interested in flipping on Trump — which is really the big, broader question in all of this"

that's true

Cohen hasn't done anything a zillion other lawyers haven't

he's being pursued not because of any crimes but as a political act

we need to reform our justice system after all this is over, to prevent this in the future

"Anonymous Proud blue state/bluer county resident said...
Early voting surged 95 percent among Democrats this year in Montgomery County and 61 percent across the state compared to the 2014 Gubernatorial primary, according to data from the Maryland Board of Elections."

it's the land of the most popular GOP governor in America!!

this is bad news for Dana Beyer

Dana's only hope is that a lot of voters are no-show

just like the delegate that will defeat Dana

less than a week from Dana Fun Day!

that biannual day of merriment when we get a good chuckle at Dana's bumbling excuses this time!

June 22, 2018 1:51 PM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

"While the popular vote losing pussy grabber falsely thinks he has the right to pardon himself for his crimes the American public overwhelmingly rejects that idea"

he actually hasn't committed any crimes

and he has said he wouldn't pardon himself

no matter

Pence can do it if the Dems pull something

that would be a stretch though because there's no scenario in which they have the votes to pull anything at all

"Swamp Person Betsy DeVos Destroying Civil Rights Policing by Education Department

Being from Michigan, I know full well how dangerous Betsy DeVos’ views on everything, especially education, are. She and her family simply don’t believe in the notion of civil rights or equality and they never have. So I’m certainly not shocked that she is busy destroying the Department of Education’s investigation of civil rights problems in public schools."

what a waste of time!

luckily, Trump is dissolving the Dept of Education

it was started by Jimmy Carter and never made any sense

We found that, under Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, the department has scuttled more than 1,200 civil rights investigations that were begun under the Obama administration and lasted at least six months. These cases, which investigated complaints of civil rights violations ranging from discriminatory discipline to sexual violence in school districts and colleges around the country, were closed without any findings of wrongdoing or corrective action, often due to insufficient evidence.

Elizabeth Hill, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education, didn’t dispute ProPublica’s data. She maintained that the Office for Civil Rights is “as committed as ever” to vigorous civil rights enforcement…

ProPublica also found that the Office for Civil Rights has become more lenient. Under Obama, 51 percent of cases that took more than 180 days culminated in findings of civil rights violations, or corrective changes. Under the Trump administration, that rate has dropped to 35 percent.

The same thing has happened at the DOJ, where Trump and Sessions have withdrawn dozens of guidance documents on civil rights, shifted the focus of the civil rights division to look at mythical anti-Christian persecution rather than on matters of racial or gender justice, and done away with agreements with local law enforcement requiring them to stay withing the boundaries of the Constitution, particularly the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

June 22, 2018 1:57 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Get back to work lazy Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous and stop wasting your work day on the internet.

June 22, 2018 1:59 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The Absurd, Cruel, And Counterproductive Trump Handling of Illegal Border Crossings

The day after Trump signed an executive order riddled with loopholes and weasel words, things got no more clear on what is actually going to change as a result. The Washington Post cites an anonymous source saying that they will no longer criminally charge parents who arrive with their kids, but then the White House appeared to contradict that.

President’s Trump’s executive order to halt family separations unleashed confusion in Washington and at the Mexico border Thursday, as Customs and Border Protection said it would it stop referring such cases for prosecution and migrant parents arrived at courthouses in Texas and Arizona wearing handcuffs only to be led away without facing charges.

After a senior U.S. Customs and Border Protection official told The Washington Post that the agency would freeze criminal referrals for migrant parents who cross illegally with children , Justice Department officials insisted their “zero tolerance” policy remained in force and that U.S. attorneys would continue to prosecute those entering the United States unlawfully…

In scenes reminiscent of the botched “Muslim ban” in the early days of the Trump presidency, federal agencies Thursday were largely left to interpret the sudden changes hastily ordered by the White House a day prior and figure out how to implement them. A family separation system that had been planned and tested over several months vanished at the president’s pen, with no stated plan to reverse its effects.

The administration’s about-face leaves intact its so-called “zero tolerance” policy toward those who break the law, but the senior Customs and Border Protection official, asked to explain how the government would change enforcement practices, said Border Patrol agents were instructed to stop sending parents who arrive in the United States with children illegally to federal courthouses for prosecution.

“We’re suspending prosecutions of adults who are members of family units until ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) can accelerate resource capability to allow us to maintain custody,” the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to explain how the agency’s has interpreted and implemented Trump’s order.

June 22, 2018 2:00 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...



They have no idea what they’re doing. Or do they? Are the mixed signals a sign of genuine confusion or are they instead trying to sow confusion so they can play to their base and calm down the furor at the same time? So much about this executive order just appears to a smokescreen, a Schrodinger’s Order that could become whatever they want it to become depending on whether they choose to take advantage of those loopholes and how they choose to enforce it. Meanwhile, there is no process in place to reunite parents and children who have already been separated.

And here’s the thing: None of this was necessary at all. What no one seems to want to talk about is how the zero tolerance policy overwhelms an already overburdened system. In an average year, we prosecute about 20,000 people for illegal border crossing, which is only a misdemeanor and almost never results in jail time, only deportation. Prosecuting every single case, as Trump is doing, will push that over 300,000 cases a year. That simply is not possible. There will be a backlog that goes back years and years before a case gets heard. And then what happens? They get deported. But they can be deported without criminal charges anyway. So we’re killing the entire system, paying to keep them locked up for years pending a trial for which the outcome will be exactly the same as it was if we just sent them back immediately.

This applies to everyone except those who request asylum or refugee status, but in those cases criminal charges are inappropriate anyway. The law does not require that they be charged, it can be treated as a civil matter and we don’t get stuck with the expense of detaining them while they await their hearing on the matter and a judge’s ruling. And we won’t have to break those families up. This policy is stupid and wasteful on every possible level. It’s a completely self-inflicted wound that never needed to happen.

June 22, 2018 2:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The day after Trump signed an executive order riddled with loopholes and weasel words, things got no more clear on what is actually going to change as a result. The Washington Post cites an anonymous source saying that they will no longer criminally charge parents who arrive with their kids, but then the White House appeared to contradict that."

what's less reliable: an anonymous source in the Washington Post or how things "appear" to Priya the Puerile?

"Justice Department officials insisted their “zero tolerance” policy remained in force"

Trump has said that consistently

"And here’s the thing: None of this was necessary at all. What no one seems to want to talk about is how the zero tolerance policy overwhelms an already overburdened system. In an average year, we prosecute about 20,000 people for illegal border crossing, which is only a misdemeanor and almost never results in jail time, only deportation. Prosecuting every single case, as Trump is doing, will push that over 300,000 cases a year."

eventually, everyone who wants to come here will use legal procedures

imagine that

let's face it

if an illegal immigrant had come in ten years ago and became a worker in the Trump campaign, Mueller would try to prosecute the immigrant and his family for entering illegally to get them to flip on Trump




June 22, 2018 2:29 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Get back to work lazy Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous.

June 22, 2018 3:03 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Everything Wrong with USA on Display at Trump Rally

Hours after signing that weird executive order, Donald Trump held a campaign-style rally in Minnesota. He loves to do those because they feed his massive, unquenchable ego. The media was there interviewing people, primarily about the controversy over family separation at the border and one woman displayed pretty much everything wrong with America in a brief interview:

After Trump signed an executive order to overturn his policy of separating parents and children, supporters at his Wednesday rally in Duluth, Minnesota defended the president.

One woman sobbed over the criticism that Trump has received.

“I see you getting emotional,” an MSNBC reporter told the woman. “Why is that?”

“Because — I just — he just,” the woman said, struggling through her tears. “He just tries so hard and so many people are so down on him.”

Seriously. We’re talking about a situation where children are literally bring ripped out of the arms of their mothers while screaming and crying, being locked up in cages and then, far too often, simply lost once they’re placed somewhere, and the thing that gets her emotional and weepy is not that, it’s that the president she likes is being criticized for those things. If that’s the part of this that gets you upset, you’re a failure as a human being.

June 22, 2018 3:03 PM  
Anonymous Enjoy the bubble while you can said...

"While this economic turnaround has come as a shock to most Democrats in Washington, it’s no surprise to millions of working families across America. They were overtaxed and overregulated for far too long, and the result was a decade of slow growth."

Ahh... Republicans trying to tell people what Democrats think again.

No, the revved-up economy is NOT a surprise to Democrats. The government is spending millions of more dollars on the military now that they have ended the draconian sequestration limits on spending that Republicans foisted upon America during the early part of the Obama administration, when Americans were losing jobs left and right because of the woefully UNDER-regulated banking, mortgage, and hedge fund markets, and criminally incompetent shepherding of the economy under W.

Republicans, trying to claim the "fiscal responsibility" mantel kept a stranglehold on the American economy as hard as they could until Obama left office - screaming about how big the deficits were going to be. So now that the best president since JFK has left office, they have started cutting taxes and spending like drunken sailors. Republicans could have helped the economy in 2008 through 2016, but they went AWOL. Nearly any spending that could have helped jump start the economy, get the great American engine running again was aborted congress.

Predictably, it was a long hard slog out of the Bush recession, born out by the hard working American people, with no help from Republicans in congress. Tax revenues of course fell tremendously during this time, and the national debt ballooned. America doesn't come close to paying her bills when much of the middle class is out of work. Republicans could have stimulated the economy back then - Obama was practically begging them for help getting new jobs legislation going while they said things like "our number one priority is making sure Obama is a one term president," and kept complaining about the deficit.

As much as Republican like to poo-poo Keynesian economics, they readily use it when they can spin it to their favor. More government spending is a major key to juicing up the economy and putting more people to work. Only, apparently, when there is a Republican in the White House.

When Obama left office, the employment numbers were moving up and the trends indicated that more of the same should be expected.

Now that Obama is out of office, talking about the deficit has suddenly gone out of style. Sure, the tax cuts are great - who doesn't want more money?

The question is, who's going to pay for this mess when the music stops?

Simple math can show that the tax cuts were far too large to ever pay for themselves - Republican's favorite excuse for reckless cutting government funding. Their tax cuts have NEVER paid for themselves, and when Reagan TRIPLED the national debt during his administration, and the lesson they took away from that was "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter." Again - only when there is a Republican in the White House.

The big question now is, when will the MASSIVE debt currently being racked up by the Republican congress and White House going to come and bite us in the ass?

Will the Giant Orange Scrotum of Doom still be in office, or will all the debt chickens come home to roost during another president's term? Will we still be coddling millionaires from reasonable tax rates that will keep our government running? And after the president that has an ass hole for a mouth has pissed off all of our allies, who's going to be in the mood to bail us out?

Probably no one. It was reckless Republican economic policies that brought is the Bush recession, and more reckless Republican economic policies that are building up our national debt to a point that will make inflation inevitable. Republicans have a really hard time understanding even basic economic concepts. I'm sure they'll blame the next, predictable debt collapse on Democrats though.

June 22, 2018 8:57 PM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

"Hours after signing that weird executive order,"

Priya the Puerile calling something weird?

tell us what's "weird" about it

(this should be fun)

"Donald Trump held a campaign-style rally in Minnesota. He loves to do those because they feed his massive, unquenchable ego."

you mean like when Obama said his nomination was the moment the oceans began to recede?

"The media was there interviewing people, primarily about the controversy over family separation at the border and one woman displayed pretty much everything wrong with America in a brief interview:

After Trump signed an executive order to overturn his policy of separating parents and children, supporters at his Wednesday rally in Duluth, Minnesota defended the president.

One woman sobbed over the criticism that Trump has received.

“I see you getting emotional,” an MSNBC reporter told the woman. “Why is that?”

“Because — I just — he just,” the woman said, struggling through her tears. “He just tries so hard and so many people are so down on him.”"

that's "pretty much everything wrong with America"?

it's the press that's devised a way to do the impossible:

make Trump a victim

"Seriously. We’re talking about a situation where children are literally bring ripped out of the arms of their mothers while screaming and crying,".

happens every day around the world when a parent is arrested

nobody locks kids up because their parents did something illegal

"you’re a failure as a human being."

it's pretty much guaranteed that Priya the Puerile will never fail as a human being

you'd have to try before you can be said to fail

June 22, 2018 11:14 PM  
Anonymous pleasingly plump with victory said...

"Ahh... Republicans trying to tell people what Democrats think again."

it was more than an attempt

it was success

"No, the revved-up economy is NOT a surprise to Democrats."

I guess they were lying during the last campaign

they said we would be in economic collapse by now

I'm not surprised

"The government is spending millions of more dollars on the military now that they have ended the draconian sequestration limits on spending that Republicans foisted upon America during the early part of the Obama administration,"

was that the early part?

I think in the early part, he wrote a kids' book, redecorated the White House, and schemed to push Obamacare on an unapproving nation

well, whenever it happened, it's ludicrous to say sequestration was draconian when Obama doubled the combined debt of every other President

"when Americans were losing jobs left and right because of the woefully UNDER-regulated banking, mortgage, and hedge fund markets, and criminally incompetent shepherding of the economy under W."

the true job losses began when Obama was inaugurated

"Republicans, trying to claim the "fiscal responsibility" mantel kept a stranglehold on the American economy as hard as they could until Obama left office - screaming about how big the deficits were going to be. So now that the best president since JFK has left office, they have started cutting taxes"

they tried to cut taxes when Obama was president but the fool threatened to veto

"and spending like drunken sailors. Republicans could have helped the economy in 2008 through 2016, but they went AWOL. Nearly any spending that could have helped jump start the economy, get the great American engine running again was aborted congress."

we were spending record deficits

we also had near zero interest

interesting, now the line is that the GOP was what made Obama's economy so bad

for the last year, they've been saying everything was great under Obama

"Obama was practically begging them for help getting new jobs legislation"

Obama didn't give jobs a moment's thought for the first two years of his presidency

he played the fiddle while America burned

"And after the president that has an ass hole for a mouth has pissed off all of our allies, who's going to be in the mood to bail us out?"

can you tell us one time when our allies have bailed us out?

June 22, 2018 11:15 PM  
Anonymous the unObama boom has commenced said...

After the flurry of amazing recent economic news, MAGA might well stand for “Make America Grow Again.” It’s time we start to call this economy "The Trump Boom."

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDP model now forecasts second quarter national growth at an astounding 4.7 percent. This growth is a stark contrast from the Obama era, where the benefits of that slow-growth era flowed primarily to the very top of the economic strata through asset inflation rather than on-the-ground Main Street growth.

For example, the National Association of Manufacturers just released its latest survey and an astounding 95 percent of manufacturers reported a positive outlook for their companies, the highest ever recorded. Importantly, 90 percent of those members are small-to-medium sized operations. In addition, more than 70 percent of those respondents plan to both hire more workers and to increase wages.

Such amazing news emanates directly from the Trump pro-growth policies of tax cuts and regulatory relief. Drew Greenblatt, who runs Marlin Steel & Wire Products and manufactures in the heart of Baltimore wrote that the tax cuts were “truly game changing” and that “I have never felt as optimistic as I have over the last year.” His firm just purchased $1 million in new American-made equipment and increased its workforce by 10 percent.

Critics of Trump often ascribe this economic momentum to his predecessor, but in June 2016, right before Trump’s electoral triumph, just 32 percent of Americans rated the economy as “good” or “excellent.” Today, 62 percent do. That consumer confidence reflects wages that are finally rising for working-class Americans as the first quarter of 2018 saw the highest income growth for any quarter in more than a decade.

Because of this confidence and income growth, consumers are spending again. On Thursday, Darden Restaurants reported a blowout earnings report sending the stock gapping higher to new all-time highs. Its flagship Olive Garden restaurant markets a modestly-priced menu that middle-class consumers can afford, and the most recent Bureau of Labor Statistics report showed non-managerial wage growth at decade highs, plus a jobless rate for non-college graduates as a 17-year-low. So, keep those breadsticks coming! Speaking of food, since Trump’s election, an incredible 2 million Americans have stopped receiving food stamps, an incredible movement toward self-sufficiency.

While the mainstream media fixates on border issues and pursues a hysterical narrative to demonize both the president and our federal law enforcement community, the reality at businesses and kitchen tables across America is an optimism and prosperity unknown since the 1990s.

America is back in business, confident, hiring, investing, and working. The Trump Boom is real, and it is just getting started.

June 22, 2018 11:27 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Anti-Gay Judge Who Literally Wrote the Book on Corruption Charged with Fraud

A West Virginia Supreme Court Justice who wrote a book all about political corruption was indicted yesterday on 22 federal charges, including fraud, setting off irony alarms everywhere.

Justice Allen H. Loughry II, a judge on the state’s Supreme Court of Appeals, published Don’t Buy Another Vote, I Won’t Pay for a Landslide: The Sordid And Continuing History of Political Corruption in West Virginia in 2006. He was arrested on Wednesday after being charged with numerous counts of fraud, false statements, and witness tampering.

The federal grand jury charged Loughry with “numerous and serious federal crimes,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of West Virginia:

Hee Hee Hee!

June 23, 2018 1:24 AM  
Anonymous I think we have a replacement for Jeff Sessions said...

"Anti-Gay Judge Who Literally Wrote the Book on Corruption Charged with Fraud"

anti-gay? how?

give us some details

it's always encouraging to hear ways people have found to oppose the gay agenda

"A West Virginia Supreme Court Justice who wrote a book all about political corruption was indicted yesterday on 22 federal charges, including fraud, setting off irony alarms everywhere."

including EVEN FRAUD?

how dastardly!

what fraud did he commit?

is it like the fraud Priya the Puerile committed when they said they are "constantly" correcting my understanding of how America's justice system works?

Or is it more like some of the other fraudulent statements Priya the Puerile makes?

"Justice Allen H. Loughry II, a judge on the state’s Supreme Court of Appeals, published Don’t Buy Another Vote, I Won’t Pay for a Landslide: The Sordid And Continuing History of Political Corruption in West Virginia in 2006. He was arrested on Wednesday after being charged with numerous counts of fraud, false statements, and witness tampering."

those sound like some scurrilous and difficult to prove allegations

he'll probably be found innocent

btw, doesn't sound like any corruption, which usually involves bribery

"The federal grand jury charged Loughry with “numerous and serious federal crimes,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of West Virginia:"

thanks for repeating

say, are you a moron?

"Hee Hee Hee!"

hence the name

Priya the Puerile

June 23, 2018 7:24 AM  
Anonymous Lies, lies and more lies said...

When Trump signed an executive order ending the separation of migrant families at the Mexican border, his “administration was insisting that it didn’t have a policy of separating families (false), that several laws and court rulings were forcing these separations (false), that Democrats were to blame (false), that only Congress could stop family separations (false) and that an executive order wouldn’t get the job done.”

No other words for it: Trump is a baldfaced liar.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said April 5 that he was unaware of a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election.

From the White House transcript:

Q: Mr. President, did you know about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels?

The President: No. No. What else?

Q: Then why did Michael Cohen make those if there was no truth to her allegations?

The President: Well, you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael is my attorney. And you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen.

Q: Do you know where he got the money to make that payment?

The President: No, I don’t know. No.


A few weeks later, Trump lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani revealed that the president reimbursed Cohen, his personal attorney, for the $130,000 he paid to Daniels. After Giuliani spilled the beans, Trump reversed his position, disclosing in a sequence of tweets that Cohen had in fact received a monthly retainer “from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a . . . non-disclosure agreement” with Daniels.

Then there’s the Justice Department inspector general report on the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. Said Trump: “I think that the report . . . totally exonerates me. There was no collusion, there was no obstruction.” The truth? The report said no such things. As Justice officials told the Senate Judiciary Committee, the inspector general did not delve into questions of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia or whether he has obstructed justice in connection with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation. The report was about Clinton, not Trump.

The list of lies goes way back: Trump’s “birther” lie, that President Barack Obama was a foreign-born Muslim; Trump’s charge that Obama had ordered wiretaps on the phones of Trump’s transition team; his assertion that he saw Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11.

As of May 31, the president had made 3,251 false or misleading claims since taking office. And there are no signs of him slowing down.

Trump’s penchant for lying, which stems back to his days of moving and shaking as a real estate mogul, is separate and apart from his reported sliming of brown- and black-skinned people to inflame, demonize and dehumanize: “Shithole countries” (Haiti, El Salvador, African nations); they “all have AIDS” (Haiti); won’t “go back to their huts” (Nigerians); they “infest our country” (immigrants).

Trump’s lying is dragging the presidency through the mud. Through his incessant falsehoods, Trump has squandered the moral authority of his office. He cannot be believed. What did he and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un really say to each other in their one-on-one in Singapore? The president of the United States cannot be trusted.

June 23, 2018 7:37 AM  
Anonymous Dems resist, Repubs produce: who will America vote for? said...

"When Trump signed an executive order ending the separation of migrant families at the Mexican border, his “administration was insisting that it didn’t have a policy of separating families (false), that several laws and court rulings were forcing these separations (false), that Democrats were to blame (false), that only Congress could stop family separations (false) and that an executive order wouldn’t get the job done.

No other words for it: Trump is a baldfaced liar."

now, this is interesting

Trump said he couldn't legally not enforce the law

under pressure, he signed an illegal executive order

and now Dems are complaining it's not working

which is what Trump said would happen

Trump is right

Dems are to blame

Republicans have introduced several immigration reform bills but Dems have unanimously opposed every one of them because they want to stop the wall from being built

they value scoring political points against Trump more than the welfare of these kids at the border

if even a handful of Dems would join the Republicans that introduce the bills, they would pass tomorrow

that's bottom line: the Dems are stopping immigration reform

Has The Resistance now well and truly lost its collective mind?

Rachel Maddow chokes up and cries on air as she struggles to deliver news that migrant babies and toddlers have been sent to "tender age" shelters

The Resistance believes it has — finally, at last, what took them so long? — hit upon an issue they can exploit to show that President Trump really is literally Hitler. That’s why they are airing round-the-clock coverage of The Children! The Babies!, why a Congressional intern (now a former Congressional intern, I hope) screamed “f***- you!” at President Trump when he visited the Capitol yesterday, why hecklers drove out Homeland Security head Kirstjen Nielsen from a restaurant (deliciously, a Mexican restaurant, the irony, the irony) yesterday.

Granted, Donald Trump must be a heartless bastard. After all, he did say “We have to send a clear message, just because your child gets across the border doesn’t mean your child gets to stay.”

Oh, wait, sorry, that was actually Hillary Clinton in 2014, not Donald Trump.

But how about those HORRIFYING HEARTRENDING photos of children in CAGES. Reminds you of Nazi Germany doesn’t it? (Not really, but still.)

Wait, wait, wrong photos. Those photos are from 2014, too.

Who was President then?

Oh, right. Barack Obama.

Didn’t he have a far more humane, open-minded, open-borderish immigration policy?

Did he? Did he?

Not really.

He explained that “undocumented” [that’s Dem-speak for “illegal”] workers will be deported because they “broke our immigration laws.”

But Bill Clinton.

Surely, he had a more humane immigration policy? Hesaid that illegal aliens are breaking the law, putting unacceptable strain on US resources, taking jobs from US citizens, and his administration will get tough and deport the miscreants.

Collective madness is always alarming to witness, and the unhinged exhibition on the airwaves and editorial pages run by The Resistance should have any sane person thinking about calling 911 and putting a little Valium in the water supply. The hysteria feeds and builds upon the hysteria. Someone just dropping in on this festival of insanity might be forgiven for thinking he was witnessing a collective effort to incarnate Edvard Munch’s painting The Scream.

This is just a ploy, a gambit, the latest strategy to undermine an astonishingly successful and increasingly popular President.

It won’t work, of course.

Why?

Because this is the issue above all others that catapulted him to the Republican nomination and won him the Presidency. For many of his supporters, who do not want to see their country turn into a scene from The Camp of the Saints, it is the one non-negotiable issue.

The President is determined to enforce our immigration laws.

If those laws are determined to be misguided, then, as he has insisted, they should be changed.



June 23, 2018 8:14 AM  
Anonymous Dems resist, Repubs produce: who will America vote for? said...

"No other words for it: Trump is a baldfaced liar.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said April 5 that he was unaware of a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election.

From the White House transcript:

Q: Mr. President, did you know about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels?

The President: No. No. What else?

Q: Then why did Michael Cohen make those if there was no truth to her allegations?

The President: Well, you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael is my attorney. And you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen.

Q: Do you know where he got the money to make that payment?

The President: No, I don’t know. No.

A few weeks later, Trump lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani revealed that the president reimbursed Cohen, his personal attorney, for the $130,000 he paid to Daniels. After Giuliani spilled the beans, Trump reversed his position, disclosing in a sequence of tweets that Cohen had in fact received a monthly retainer “from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a . . . non-disclosure agreement” with Daniels."

if all he did was pay a retainer, he might not have known how it was used

no matter

even if he did lie, it's of no consequence

he had an affair and paid the other party no to talk

no one cares, they think it's fine

"Then there’s the Justice Department inspector general report on the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. Said Trump: “I think that the report . . . totally exonerates me. There was no collusion, there was no obstruction.” The truth? The report said no such things. As Justice officials told the Senate Judiciary Committee, the inspector general did not delve into questions of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia or whether he has obstructed justice in connection with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation. The report was about Clinton, not Trump."

the report did mention that it appears that the Russia hoax was started and Clinton probe dropped because two FBI agents said the wanted to "stop" Trump

in his opinion, that shows the investigation was bogus from the start

that's not only not a lie, it may be his opinion is right

"The list of lies goes way back: Trump’s “birther” lie, that President Barack Obama was a foreign-born Muslim;"

he said it should be looked into

he was right

"Trump’s charge that Obama had ordered wiretaps on the phones of Trump’s transition team;"

he was right about that

"his assertion that he saw Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11."

poor recollection is not a lie

he probably was remembering what I did: Palestinians on the West Bank who celebrated 9/11

"As of May 31, the president had made 3,251 false or misleading claims since taking office. And there are no signs of him slowing down."

I doubt he'll break Bill Clinton's record

but based on what you said above, it's not clear how many of those were actual lies

"Trump’s lying is dragging the presidency through the mud. Through his incessant falsehoods, Trump has squandered the moral authority of his office."

it survived the lies of Clinton and Obama

"He cannot be believed. What did he and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un really say to each other in their one-on-one in Singapore? The president of the United States cannot be trusted."

you mean like when Barry Obama was caught telling a Russian official that he would more be more flexible after he fooled Americans into re-electing him?

we only know that because he didn't realize the mic was on

who knows what else Obama told foreigners

what we do know is he wasn't concerned with the best interest of America and Trump is

June 23, 2018 8:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I think we're at the beginning of a soft civil war," political scientist Thomas Schaller says. "I don't know if the country gets out of it whole."

The heightened conflict of recent weeks led to more ominous rhetoric — anyone else notice the abundance of Nazi references from sane people? — and more definitive, unequivocal acts. Former Republican strategist Steve Schmidt renounced his party of 29 years this week and pledged to vote for Democrats until decency returns to the GOP.

Law professor and blogger Orin Kerr, perhaps sensing the ugly turn in the air, tweeted: "Few things are more corrosive in politics than the conviction that you have been wronged so much that you're justified in breaking all the rules to get even."

Democrats are tired of the rules. Lots of rules, after all, don't do Democrats any favors. The past two Republican presidencies were a product of the Electoral College, not a popular vote, which Dems think they would have won. The Senate favors rural states over representative democracy. (Los Angeles County has a larger population than 42 states, each of which has two more senators than LA County has.) Seats in the House of Representatives are apportioned in such a way — due both to geography and gerrymandering — that Democrats must win far more than 50 percent of the collective vote to win a majority of the House.

And what if Democrats fall short in November, as seems likely? Especially if Democratic candidates get more votes than Republicans but fail to gain control of at least one side of Congress?

Here's an easy prediction. Democrats will then experience rage — at Tea-Party levels or worse.

David Frum said, "When highly committed parties strongly believe things that they cannot achieve democratically, they don't give up on their beliefs — they give up on democracy."

Liberals have a great deal of cultural, academic and economic heft, stretching from Hollywood to Harvard. Just this week, some Hollywood powerhouses flirted with leveraging their clout against the Trumpist Fox News. There are endless variations on such a power play. If Democrats opt to use their power more aggressively — breaking rules —Schaller's soft civil war hardly seems unlikely.

June 23, 2018 8:49 AM  
Anonymous Jeff Sessions called up Nazi Germany's treatment of Jewish people said...

The Trump administration's "zero-tolerance" policy, in which children are being separated from their families when they cross the US-Mexico border illegally, drew comparisons to Nazi Germany on Monday.

Critics used that reference to highlight what they described as the callous nature of a policy that splits up families seeking refuge in the US.

During an interview with Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham on Monday night, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rebuked the criticism: "It's a real exaggeration," Sessions said. "In Nazi Germany, they would keep the Jews from leaving the country."

That comment sparked some additional conversation online overnight. "When you have to explain to people why your policies aren't exactly like Nazi Germany, it's time to rethink your policies,."

Sessions argued that immigrants seeking asylum would be given due process according to the law, but he quickly pivoted to what he views as the bigger side-effect of illegal immigration to the US.

"People who want economic migration for their own personal financial benefit and what they think is their family's benefit is not basis for a claim of asylum," Sessions said. When asked during his Fox News interview whether family separations were being used as a deterrent to illegal immigration, Sessions acknowledged that it is.

"Yes, hopefully people will get the message and come through the border at the port of entry and not break across the border unlawfully," Sessions told Ingraham.

Just hours earlier, a reporter asked Homeland Security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen if the department is "intending to send a message" with its family separation policy. Nielsen called that question "offensive."

June 23, 2018 10:00 AM  
Anonymous Our local liar lies yet again said...

"the report did mention that it appears that the Russia hoax was started and Clinton probe dropped because two FBI agents said the wanted to "stop" Trump"

Show us the quote saying that.

Anyone can read the report: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

And those who bother to read the report for themselves rather than ignorantly repeat partisan spin would know it says:

"In particular, we were concerned about text messages exchanged by FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. As we describe in Chapter Twelve of our report, most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, the suggestion in certain Russia- related text messages in August 2016 that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact presidential candidate Trump’s electoral prospects caused us to question the earlier Midyear investigative decisions in which Strzok was involved, and whether he took specific actions in the Midyear investigation based on his political views. As we describe Chapter Five of our report, we found that Strzok was not the sole decisionmaker for any of the specific Midyear investigative decisions we examined in that chapter.
We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation,such as the use of grand jury subpoenas and search warrants to obtain evidence.

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility. But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable. The broader impact of these text and instant messages, including on such matters as the public perception of the FBI and the Midyear investigation, are discussed in Chapter Twelve of our report."

You fucking liar.

June 23, 2018 10:19 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Shameless liar Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous lied "the report did mention that it appears that the Russia hoax was started and Clinton probe dropped because two FBI agents said the wanted to "stop" Trump"

They've posted some pretty blatant lies here, but that's one of the worst. As Good Anonymous posted, the report said no such thing. It said the two low level investigators who exchanged those texts had no effect on the investigation and that there was no bias.

Wyatt/Regina claim to be christians but they constantly break their bibles commandment not to lie. They really are a couple of the most despicable people you'll ever meet.

They tell blatant lies like this and then laughably claim not to be trolls.

June 23, 2018 12:18 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump: ‘No Longer a Threat’ North Korea Still an ‘Extraordinary Threat’

When he came back from the photo op with Kim Jong-un, Trump declared that North Korea’s nuclear program was “no longer a threat.” He had fixed the problem once and for all and “everybody can now feel much safer.” Here was his Tweet from last week:

"Just landed – a long trip, but everybody can now feel much safer than the day I took office. There is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea. Meeting with Kim Jong Un was an interesting and very positive experience. North Korea has great potential for the future!"
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2018

But then on Friday, the White House announced that they were extending an old executive order dealing with North Korea and justified it by the “unique and extraordinary threat” that his nuclear program still poses to the United States:

“The existence and risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula and the actions and policies of the government of North Korea continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United States,” read the notice, delivered through the press secretary on Friday.

Humpty Trumpty strikes again. Reality is whatever he declares it to be at any given moment and if that contradicts what he said 10 minutes ago, then both are true simultaneously, or sequentially. Who are you going to believe, Trump or Trump? It’s almost like he’s just full of crap, isn’t it?

That's just like Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous, lol!

June 23, 2018 12:18 PM  
Anonymous George F. Will said...

Full article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html?utm_term=.549df1294ca0

Even Republicans are starting to figure out they need to vote Democrat this November

"Amid the carnage of Republican misrule in Washington, there is this glimmer of good news: The family-shredding policy along the southern border, the most telegenic recent example of misrule, clarified something. Occurring less than 140 days before elections that can reshape Congress, the policy has given independents and temperate Republicans — these are probably expanding and contracting cohorts, respectively — fresh if redundant evidence for the principle by which they should vote.

The principle: The congressional Republican caucuses must be substantially reduced. So substantially that their remnants, reduced to minorities, will be stripped of the Constitution’s Article I powers that they have been too invertebrate to use against the current wielder of Article II powers. They will then have leisure time to wonder why they worked so hard to achieve membership in a legislature whose unexercised muscles have atrophied because of people like them...

...In today’s GOP, which is the president’s plaything, he is the mainstream. So, to vote against his party’s cowering congressional caucuses is to affirm the nation’s honor while quarantining him. A Democratic-controlled Congress would be a basket of deplorables, but there would be enough Republicans to gum up the Senate’s machinery, keeping the institution as peripheral as it has been under their control and asphyxiating mischief from a Democratic House. And to those who say, “But the judges, the judges!” the answer is: Article III institutions are not more important than those of Articles I and II combined."

June 23, 2018 1:39 PM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

I appropriately noted:

"the report did mention that it appears that the Russia hoax was started and Clinton probe dropped because two FBI agents said they wanted to "stop" Trump"

an angry TTF elf said:

"Show us the quote saying that."

when discussing this statement, which DOJ deep state actors redacted when they sent the texts to Congress, Horowitz said “we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on new evidence in the Clinton case was free from bias.”

Anyone can read the report: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

And those who bother to read the report for themselves rather than ignorantly repeat liberal spin would know what it says

an angry TTF elf said:

"You fucking liar."

why are you so angry?

is it because the liberal hoax has been exposed and it looks like Dems are heading for another stunning defeat this fall?

June 23, 2018 4:19 PM  
Anonymous sage about rage said...

yeah, I think that's it

that's why the elf's angry

June 23, 2018 4:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

more about Dem lies:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/immigration-toddler-trump-media.html

June 23, 2018 4:28 PM  
Anonymous Lying liars continued said...

"why are you so angry?

is it because the liberal hoax has been exposed and it looks like Dems are heading for another stunning defeat this fall?"

I'm angry at having to correct all your fucking lies.

No liberal hoax has been exposed. Whoever wrote the Daily Wire piece (an American conservative news and opinion website founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro) claiming the mother and crying daughter had been reported to have been separated and then claimed it was all a lie, apparently didn't read all the way to the end of the WaPo or CNN pieces, both of which were about the photographer, that first showed those photos.

First WaPo
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/06/18/i-wanted-to-stop-her-crying-the-image-of-a-migrant-child-that-broke-a-photographers-heart/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d26fb7c940f7

"....Moore was kneeling in the road about six feet away. Most other families were already in the van. He knew that whatever photos he took next would be his last before he returned to his hotel room, then flew home to Connecticut and his own children.

“It was very quick,” he recalled. The mother set the girl down, and an agent began to run gloved hands across her body.

Immediately, the girl began to scream.

“I wanted to stop her crying,” Moore said. He imagined the guards might have wanted that, too; he had seen them joke with other children during searches, to distract from what was happening to their parents.

But it all happened so quickly, and the girl’s despair was so complete in those few seconds.

“The mother stoically had her hands against the vehicle, and the girl was crying,” Moore said. “Neither were saying words. Nothing could be said with her. She needed to be with her mother.”

He took two shots, moments apart. He understood at once that they were the photos he had been waiting for — for hours, if not years. Both images would become symbols of what the U.S.-Mexico border has become under President Trump.

And then the woman picked up her daughter, they walked into the van, the van drove away, and Moore never saw them again.

He began to breathe very heavily and feel things he had not felt in years. He had to think back to his time in war zones and Ebola wards to remember a similar feeling.

In his head, he weighed the girl’s chances. According to new federal policies, he said, she would be taken from her mother when the van reached its destination. They would not be reunited until their case had wound through the courts, and then likely only to return to the country they had fled...."

Next CNN:
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/06/us/crying-girl-john-moore-immigration-cnnphotos/

"The 2-year-old girl looks up at the adults around her with tears in her frightened eyes, her curls clinging to the side of her face and her mouth opened in a terrified cry.

The girl, who was with her mother and others, had rafted across the Rio Grande and were stopped in Texas by US Border Patrol agents last week.

Agents were searching people before they were taken into vans to be driven to a processing center. John Moore, a Getty photographer and Pulitzer Prize winner, took the picture after the toddler's mother set her down.

"One of the last people to get on the bus was the mother of this child and her daughter together," he told CNN's Ana Cabrera. "And when they went to body-search (the mother) against the vehicle, they asked her to put down her child. And right then, in that moment, the little girl broke into tears..."

Just like you did not read the Inspector General's report but lied about it anyway. No, no BIAS was found on the part of any FBI agents, you fucking liar.

FUCK YOU and the rest of you lying deplorable IQ45 supporters.

June 23, 2018 5:51 PM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

uh, both those stories lack any separation between the mother and daughter

the way the liberal has used the girl is actually pretty despicable

I quoted the IG saying “we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation was free from bias.”

you have only read, and quoted, the summary conclusion

you need to look at the facts presented, and think for yourself

but first you need to stop shaking and calm down

you're a very angry elf

you remind me of Hillary in the hotel watching the networks call Wisconsin for Trump

wonder if the campaign paid for the damage to the hotel room

well, she was prescribed a sedative

call the doctor

"FUCK YOU and the rest of you lying deplorable IQ45 supporters."

this attitude isn't a winner

June 23, 2018 11:15 PM  
Anonymous why am I such a nice guy? said...

maybe Lying liars continued is a nasty woman!!

June 23, 2018 11:18 PM  
Anonymous Lies, lies, lies said...

"uh, both those stories lack any separation between the mother and daughter"

Yes, and those were the original stories, twisted and misquoted by the right winger at Daily Wire, who started this whole lying mess, claiming those articles, which clearly say mother and daughter left the scene TOGETHER, said otherwise.

It's what GOPers and their Russian bots do, lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie with you as one of their biggest echo chamber cheerleaders who didn't bother to check original sources.

And your next lie lie about Hilary supposedly damaging a hotel room shows you have a chronic problem with truth telling.

Armchair unprofessional diagnosis -- you are a pathological liar.



June 24, 2018 8:44 AM  
Anonymous Snopes.com said...

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/immigrant-girl-never-separated/

June 24, 2018 9:09 AM  
Anonymous sage about rage said...

"Yes, and those were the original stories, twisted and misquoted by the right winger at Daily Wire, who started this whole lying mess, claiming those articles, which clearly say mother and daughter left the scene TOGETHER, said otherwise."

then, why was the picture used, if it didn't illustrate the story

because it has echoed across the internet without this "clear" statement, most famously by Time magazine on its cover, which photoshopped in Trump glowering over the crying girl

"It's what GOPers"

GOP politicians don't lie as much as Dems

you won't hear them arguing about the meaning of "is"

"and their Russian bots do, lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie"

Russian propaganda efforts, which have been ongoing for decades, promote any disruption in our society

in 2016, they also issued lies assisting Bernie Sanders and Black Lives Matter

"with you as one of their biggest echo chamber cheerleaders who didn't bother to check original sources."

you're the one echoing the liberal spin about the exploitation of this little girl

"And your next lie lie about Hilary supposedly damaging a hotel room shows you have a chronic problem with truth telling."

you sure about that?

"Armchair unprofessional diagnosis -- you are a pathological liar."

casual observation: you are frustrated and angry because the Dem hoax about Russia has been exposed

you really thought it was going to work

now, take your meds before you start spouting the F word again

June 24, 2018 12:07 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

How American Policy in Honduras Created the Refugee Crisis

Several years ago we saw mass migration from Honduras during the Obama administration, including almost 70,000 unaccompanied minors showing up at the border. That is now repeating itself, but with the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy making the situation dramatically worse. And much of this, as Joseph Nevins of the North American Congress on Latin America documents, is a result of deliberate US policy to destabilize that country in the name of profit.

You’ve no doubt heard the phrase “banana republic” bandied about, but you may not know the history of it. Honduras is the country about which it was invented in the late 1800s. Specifically, it was about the Cuyamel Fruit Company, later called United Fruit Company, and now known as Chiquita Brands International. In the 1890s. US-based fruit companies essentially took control of Honduras, owning all the good land for banana production and disrupting the trade in that country’s other major crop, coffee.

By the early 1900s, more than a million acres were owned for banana production, but the profits all went to the wealthy landowners, not the poor peasants who actually worked the land. Indeed, they were made all the more impoverished by being denied access to most of that country’s agricultural land. There were uprisings now and then, but they were put down by American military interventions, directly in 1907 and 1911, and indirectly through military aid and control throughout the rest of the 20th century. It got particularly bad under Reagan, who used Honduras as a training and staging ground for the Contras seeking to overthrow the government in Nicaragua.

American aid and support for the Honduran oligarchy and the American companies they helped enrich ensured that this country would remain desperately poor with a massive disparity in wealth. The people live in poverty while the ultra-rich control the government and the military. Post-Reagan, there was a moment of optimism as with the election of liberal reformer Manuel Zelaya in 2006, but he was soon put down in a military coup — almost all of the Honduran officer corps was trained by the American military and involved the families of those oligarchs — and that reignited what is now essentially a failing state (for everyone but the rich, that is). Nevins writes:

Organized crime, drug traffickers and the country’s police heavily overlap. Impunity reigns in a country with frequent politically-motivated killings. It is the world’s most dangerous country for environmental activists, according to Global Witness, an international nongovernmental organization.

Although its once sky-high murder rate has declined, the continuing exodus of many youth demonstrates that violent gangs still plague urban neighborhoods.

Meanwhile, post-coup governments have intensified an increasingly unregulated, “free market” form of capitalism that makes life unworkable for many. Government spending on health and education, for example, has declined in Honduras. Meanwhile, the country’s poverty rate has risen markedly. These contribute to the growing pressures that push many people to migrate.

This is what people are fleeing, and it’s little better in neighboring countries in Latin America. They are fleeing the organized crime cartels that Trump is falsely accusing them of belonging to, just like he accuses Syrian refugees of being part of ISIS when it is, at least partly, ISIS that they are trying to escape. The story of American foreign policy in the 20th century was largely the story of how we installed and propped up one corrupt, barbaric dictator after another, ostensibly in the name of stopping communism but really in defense of the profits of American companies. We created the conditions that give rise to the refugee and human rights crisis, then declare it a crisis and crack down on the victims of our own policy. We should be ashamed of that, but I’m not sure most Americans are even capable of such shame.

June 24, 2018 12:32 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

So crooked Republican congressmen have pressured the Department of Justice into handing over thousands of pages of the investigation into Trumpgate. This is against government policy but the Republicans bullshit that this is for their "oversight" duties. In fact what they're doing is funnelling all the information to Trump's lawyers to help him escape justice.

American democracy is being destroyed by a corrupt Republican party as we watch.

June 24, 2018 12:35 PM  
Anonymous ready for November yet? said...

There are more than 2,000 children still apart from their families, with very little hope of ever finding their parents again, and none of the underlying reasons for this atrocity in the first place have been addressed. Nor are they likely to be addressed in the Congress today, as one of the latest GOP immigration bills staggers toward failure. Nor do the Dems seem willing to tackle the problem at its source, by finding a legislative compromise with the GOP and president, on both legal and illegal immigration. That means families in cages multiplying in the future; it means more endangered children; it means an even deeper coarsening of our moral values; it means more and more people in limbo; it means genuine refugees losing asylum and being deported back to their nightmares; and it portends even greater polarization ahead.

The reason for that is simple: The United States has not allocated the resources, political and financial, to stem the wave of illegal immigrants into this country that is now rising again, or to enable genuine asylum cases to be adjudicated fairly and expeditiously. Our political system — incapacitated by tribalism — has been incapable of addressing the intensifying problem since the Bush administration. Obama was trapped by the same impasse as Trump now is, and detained families in camps. And the problem is acute. There are almost a third of a million asylum cases pending in the system; and it now takes up to nine months to process a single one. We also know that courts bar any detention of children with their parents past 20 days and the court decision has not been invalidated or legislatively fixed.

Which means to say that in less than three weeks, we will be here again, with another excruciating dilemma. Do we set up vast tent cities and camps to imprison families indefinitely, or do we simply let these families go free, and hope they show up for a future court date? Either way, we solve nothing fundamental and leave a huge incentive for those trying to enter the U.S. illegally to bring children with them when they do. And that does happen. There is fraud and trafficking and opportunism as well as valid family-based escapes from violence and persecution, and it can be hard to tell one from the other.

Dems do not wish to let Trump off the hook in any way before November. But there’s a big conflict here if you actually want to end the suffering. If you do not want to jail kids with their parents indefinitely, or to maintain the incentive for illegal migrants to bring kids along for the harrowing ride, you need some sort of congressional action and soon. There’s something deeply wrong, it seems to me, with expressing the view that what the government is doing is barbaric and yet allowing the underlying cause of it to continue for political reasons. If that’s the case, then Dems are using kids as pawns, and Trump is right about Dems being the problem.

June 24, 2018 12:45 PM  
Anonymous ready for November yet? said...

The Dems need to accept that they lost the last presidential election for a reason, and that their opponent’s main campaign pledge was to tackle illegal immigration, with a wall at the southern border as the centerpiece. Completely resisting a legitimate agenda based on a clear campaign promise is cynical politics with kids as its victims.

And there is clearly an adamant, persistent segment of the public that sees the crisis of illegal immigration as a vital one. They’re not alone. Cast an eye at Brexit Britain, newly populist Italy, Macron’s France, and even Merkel’s Germany as it heaves in response to mass immigration from the developing world. This is a huge force in Western politics in every country. Finding the right balance between reason and compassion is essential if we are not going to further tear this country apart, or witness ever more humanitarian catastrophes, or see what’s left of the West go under.

So give him his fucking wall. He won the election. He is owed this. It may never be completed; it may not work, as hoped. But it is now the only way to reassure a critical mass of Americans that mass immigration is under control, and the only way to make any progress under this president.

If all this sounds like appeasing a bigot, I understand. But better to see it, I think, as a way to address the legitimate concerns, fears, and worries of a large number of Americans who feel like strangers in their own land. It’s also simply the moral thing to do to relieve real human misery on the borders. It’s good politics too, I’d argue, for both parties in the medium term. Dems who are currently posturing are playing a good card badly. They give off the appearance, as Hillary did, of making no distinction between legal and illegal immigration, favoring de facto open borders, and calling anyone who disagrees with them a white supremacist. Until they recognize that illegal immigration is a huge and legitimate problem, and until they propose a set of actual policy proposals to end it humanely and efficiently, they run the risk of another 2016 in 2020.

June 24, 2018 12:45 PM  
Anonymous good and anonymous said...

"So crooked Republican congressmen have pressured the Department of Justice into handing over thousands of pages of the investigation into Trumpgate. This is against government policy but the Republicans bullshit that this is for their "oversight" duties. In fact what they're doing is funnelling all the information to Trump's lawyers to help him escape justice.

American democracy is being destroyed by a corrupt Republican party as we watch."

If you're wondering how such an ignorant comment could be made, the person that wrote it is a foreign troll that spreads misinformation, much like the Russian bots tat tried to sow discord with messages supporting Bernie Sanders, Black Lives Matter, et al.

The Congressional committee are democratically elected so protecting the Constitution oversight rule protects democracy, it doesn't destroy it.

Trump is not under criminal investigation and, even if he were, people have a right to know why they're being investigated. That's not every detail of the investigation but what the origin of the investigation is. Congress has an interest in making sure this is not a political activity. If so, acquiescing in it would tend to destroy democracy.

"This is against government policy"

lie of the day by Priya the Foreign Trollbot

June 24, 2018 1:13 PM  
Anonymous feelings, whoa whoa whoa, feelings said...

"In fact what they're doing is funnelling all the information to Trump's lawyers to help him escape justice."

I dunno, good and anonymous.

This one seems like a pretty big lie by Priya the Foreign Trollbot too!

Let's try a game:

uh, Priya the FTb, please gives us some evidence to back this up.

We'll keep track of how long you're stalling.

June 24, 2018 1:17 PM  
Anonymous yay-ooo, I'm stuck on the border said...

there's an interesting phenomena taking place amongst the GBLTQ candidates in Monkey County

it all started with Dana

Dana's signs were bigger than everyone else's

probably thought this would have some subliminal effect

then, all the other sexually deviant candidates starting doing the same thing

Pete Fosselman and Rich Mandaleno also put up the big signs

funny, all the straight candidates seem to not be participating in the sign escalation

only the QBTGL candidates

those types of candidates apparently think size matters

June 24, 2018 2:12 PM  
Anonymous No surprise here said...

One of the latest liars lies more...

TIME Magazine's Shocking Cover Is a Total Lie

Ben Shapiro, The Daily Wire

June 24, 2018 3:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This week, TIME magazine featured a picture of a crying illegal immigrant child on its cover. The child was supposedly separated from her parents; over her looms Donald Trump, smugly staring down at her.

There’s only one problem: the cover is total bull. It’s not just total bull because Trump hasn’t implemented a newly-developed policy of separating children from parents – that’s an operation of law under the Flores settlement as modified by a 2016 Ninth Circuit court ruling. It’s bull because this particular child wasn’t separated from her mother, her mother wasn’t fleeing persecution but did falsely claim asylum, her mother did put the child in danger, and Trump was targeted by the media for treating this mother and child exactly the same way the Obama administration would have.

Here’s the real story.

The little girl is from Honduras. She wasn’t separated from her mother; she was crying because her mother was crossing illegally into the United States and the little girl was “tired and thirsty,” according to Border Patrol.

So, why did the mother take off for America? According to dad, she ditched her three other children because she wanted better economic opportunities.

Yet this photo was passed around endlessly, and was used by various human rights groups to raise cash for their anti-Trump efforts.

The media have spent the last several years believing that Americans dislike them only because President Trump has somehow manipulated them. That isn’t true. Trump merely took advantage of the fact that the media have utterly undermined their own credibility, and continue to do so each day. No wonder Trump loves the media: they’re doing him the favor of demonstrating their continuing bias by promoting actual fake news on a regular basis.

June 24, 2018 4:59 PM  
Anonymous something for the hypocrites said...

What Stephanie Wilkinson, the owner of the Little Red Hen restaurant, did to White House press spokesman Sarah Sanders and her party was appalling — but she’s not backing down:

And she knew — she believed — that Sarah Huckabee Sanders worked in the service of an “inhumane and unethical” administration. That she publicly defended the president’s cruelest policies, and that that could not stand.

Wilkinson had no regrets about her decision.

“I would have done the same thing again,” she said “We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.”

Sarah Sanders was not the one who broke the news about her eviction from the restaurant. An employee of the restaurant did, on his Facebook account.

If you are someone who believes that Masterpiece Cakeshop ought to have been forced to bake a cake decorated for a gay wedding, but you think that Stephanie Wilkinson was right to kick Sarah Sanders out of her restaurant because she hates Sanders’s politics, then you are an unprincipled hypocrite.

I believe that Masterpiece Cakeshop has that moral right, and I believe that the Red Hen has that right too. Whether they have that legal right is a different question, and whether they should act on that moral right is another. But there’s an important distinction here.

Masterpiece did not try to deny service across the board to gay customers. Its owner only wanted to deny them a custom-made wedding cake, because it violated his religious beliefs. Red Hen denied service across the board to Sanders and her party because they hate her politics. If Sarah Sanders had asked the Red Hen owner to cater a Trump party, that would have been a closer analogy. And if the Masterpiece Cakeshop owner had refused to serve gays at all, that would be a closer analogy.

Are we really going to be the kind of country in which businesses drive those whose politics offend them out of their premises? Are we really going to be the kind of country in which activists enter restaurants and drive particular customers out, because of their politics?

Who does this help? I’ll tell you who: Donald J. Trump. Conservative people see this, and they imagine themselves being thrown out of a restaurant, either by the owner or by left-wing protesters, because they are conservative. They see themselves being driven out of the public square by the left — which all the while congratulates itself on its superior morality — and it makes them furious. For the woke left, even trying to eat out with your spouse and your friends at a restaurant is now political, and must be punished.

A Washington Post caption under a photo of the restaurant reads:

A placard quoting the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. — “Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a friend” — sits in the window of the Red Hen, which opened in Lexington in 2008.

They don’t believe that at the Little Red Hen. They like to think they do, but they don’t. I wonder how things might have gone if Wilkinson had asked Sanders for a private word after dinner, or had sent over a round of dessert, and come by the table to talk. I don’t think it’s a restaurant owner’s place to address the politics of their customers, but at least that would have been better than throwing them out. (And yes, I would feel exactly the same way if a right-wing restaurant owner had treated Hillary Clinton’s staff so rudely.)

June 24, 2018 5:15 PM  
Anonymous ready for November yet? said...

You knew it was coming. Eighteen months into the Trump administration and the president’s ostensibly serious critics have finally broken the glass on the “Trump-is-a-Nazi” line of attack.

To be certain, there were previous allusions to this from media, Democrats and “Never Trumpers” — accusations of authoritarianism meant to implicitly draw the connection between President Donald Trump and Nazi Germany. Apart from the “over-woke,” under-informed Hollywood set, however, critics largely managed to avoid making the explicit comparison.

Until now, that is, with the issue of family separations at the U.S. border dominating headlines.

The president’s critics have crossed a rhetorical line from which there can be no turning back.

That the Trump administration would be compared with Nazi Germany is not surprising. Accusations of “Republicans-as-fascists” long predate this administration. A Democratic congressman accused President Ronald Reagan of “trying to replace the Bill of Rights with fascist precepts lifted verbatim from ‘Mein Kampf.’ ” In more recent times, recall Keith Olbermann’s tarring of President George W. Bush as a “fascist” in an on-air segment in 2008, an appellation also bestowed upon other members of the Bush administration.

Members of Congress, former officials, reporters and TV commentators have tweeted comparisons of U.S. detention facilities to Nazi concentration camps or issued none-too-subtle invocations of gas chambers in their tweets about children being led away from their parents by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Reporters have peppered administration officials with questions about their “Nazi” tactics.

On Friday, an MSNBC commentator extended the Nazi label to every Trump supporter, declaring: “If you vote for Trump then you, the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the border, like Nazis, going: ‘You here, you here.’”

Given that the Obama administration also housed separated children in “cages,” which merited the faintest of peeps from supplicant media, politicians and activists, this newfound outrage comes off as contrived partisanship.

Going full-bore with accusations of Nazism is a grave strategic error on the part of those opposing the president.

There has been escalating rhetoric from the moment Donald Trump pulled off his “upset” defeat of Hillary Clinton, rhetoric that has reached its natural conclusion that Trump must be literally Adolf Hitler. For some bizarre reason, however, Democrats decided that now — five months away from midterm elections, and in the midst of a whirlwind of other headlines — was the time to deploy their rhetorical nuclear option.

Like it or not, news cycles move at breakneck speed in the Trump era and often are determined by the president himself. By the time midterms roll around, this latest contretemps will be the faintest of memories.

This, then, raises the question: Where do Democrats and their “Never Trump” conservative hangers-on go next, rhetorically, having spent their shot on the border issue? Anything less than full accusations of Nazism will seem tame by comparison. Now that Trump is “actually Hitler,” any compromise by Democrats will be viewed as kowtowing to fascism. Conversely, sticking with the Nazism line of attack cheapens its effect and, frankly, makes its proponents come off as a little more than unhinged, something perhaps already at play given that a Gallup poll has put Trump at his highest approval rating to date.

Is this perhaps the last, desperate gasp of the president’s critics? Do they double down and ride the Trump-as-Hitler narrative — and themselves — into the ground until November’s midterms and beyond? Undoubtedly, the president is ready to chum the waters with another carefully manufactured outrage to distract the pundit class.

Despite what should have been a slam-dunk for critics of the president, the overwrought rhetoric of Democrats may have handed the modern-day Teflon Don another victory, and harmed their longer-term prospects in the process

June 24, 2018 5:31 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The Monumental Hypocrisy of Conservatives

Sarah Huckabee Sanders was refused service in a restaurant because of her immoral behavior.

Fox News' Jeanine Pirro had a profoundly hypocritical meltdown over it:

“Political debate at the very heart of the founding of this country has devolved into political harassment and outright political abuse. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, one of the most of prestigious jobs in Washington, D.C., out to dinner, places her order and is then told to leave by the owner because she works for the president of the United States. Sarah quietly leaves.

“The Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen this week was literally screamed and heckled out of a restaurant while eating her dinner. Trump supporters are being harassed all across this country by a hysterical left unwilling to accept the decision and the will of the American people who put Donald Trump in office. These unhinged leftists are normalizing outrageous behavior which is only getting worse.” – Jeanine Pirro, on last night’s show.

Judge Jeanine, don't try to give us this "will of the American people" bullshit. The will of the American people was that Hillary be president - she got nearly 3 million more votes than Trump. Trump is president based on a technicality, he is the most illegitimate president ever.

Conservatives like Pirro have long defended christians refusing to serve innocent gays. It doesn't get more hypocritical to then complain about conservative bigots getting the same sort of treatment the defend giving to gays. Conservatives like Pirro falsely claim these anti-gay bigots are moral people who aren't hurting anyone and who don't hate gays. They have no right to complain when people who really are good refuse to serve conservatives like Huckabee-Sanders and Kirstjen Nielsen because they've behaved extremely immorally.

If its okay to refuse service to innocent gays who've harmed no one it is most certainly okay to refuse service to immoral conservatives who've harmed countless numbers of innocent people.

June 24, 2018 6:05 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Speaking of Monumental Hypocrisy:

Today the popular vote losing pussy grabber said "We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back to where they came. Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order."

What the mango Mussolini is proposing is exactly the opposite of good immigration policy and law and order. He's tearing up the U.S. constitution and demanding that the law be broken by violating due process. Trump is admitting that he has no moral boundaries whatsoever and he expects to be treated as the King of the U.S.A who is not subject to any laws or checks and balances. Trump is saying "L'etat c'est moi.".

Just like Putin, Trump is bit by bit destroying the democratic institutions of the U.S.A in order to enrich himself and give himself unlimited power. Trump's "presidency" is entirely about enriching himself and his supporters, the level of corruption is profound.

American democracy is dying and conservatives blinded by hate are cheering that on.

June 24, 2018 6:22 PM  
Anonymous Dems resist, Repubs produce: who will America vote for? said...

"Judge Jeanine, don't try to give us this "will of the American people" bullshit. The will of the American people was that Hillary be president"

no, there are pockets, NY & Calif mostly, where Hillary support was focused

most of America were revulsed by the idea Hillary would be President

"- she got nearly 3 million more votes than Trump."

if you add up fifty-some separate contests

but that's illogical since people in all those contests made their decisions on how and whether to participate based on the outlook in the particular contest they were eligible for

with Hillary's support so concentrated that made a significant difference

"Trump is president based on a technicality,"

actually, no

it was designed intentionally to only allow someone to be President if they have widespread support across the land

Hillary never did

"Conservatives like Pirro have long defended christians refusing to serve innocent gays."

based on you recent lies, we'll need some support here

show us when Pirro said not to serve homosexuals

"It doesn't get more hypocritical to then complain about conservative bigots getting the same sort of treatment the defend giving to gays. Conservatives like Pirro falsely claim these anti-gay bigots are moral people who aren't hurting anyone and who don't hate gays. They have no right to complain when people who really are good refuse to serve conservatives like Huckabee-Sanders and Kirstjen Nielsen because they've behaved extremely immorally."

the Trump policy was dictated by a court order and was the same as Obama's

the court won't allow kids held for more than twenty days so we'll be back there in 3 weeks unless the Dems stop obstructing the passage of immigration reform

"If its okay to refuse service to innocent gays who've harmed no one it is most certainly okay to refuse service to immoral conservatives who've harmed countless numbers of innocent people."

the hypocrisy is all yours

you swore up and down that all businesses are obligated to serve all customers

we knew you were lying then

it's part of your character

btw, five hours since you were asked to back up this lie:

"In fact what they're doing is funnelling all the information to Trump's lawyers to help him escape justice."

stop stalling

just admit what we all know:

you're a liar

June 24, 2018 6:24 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The barking wigstand's assertion of unreviewable power to serve as prosecutor, judge, and jury of every asylum-seeker's claim of right to be in the States has no basis in the American constitution or laws. It is a power grab of the sort done by facist dictators. Trump expects due process for himself and his corrupt supporters but no for innocent groups like most immigrants seaking asylum or the exonerated Central Park Five. He covets impunity and the ability to punish those he dislikes without cause.

When someone says "its not right they get yelled at when they're at restaurants" just remind them that Trump wants to eliminate due process.

June 24, 2018 6:29 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The depths of Trump's ignorance are profound. Even those who are admittedly in the States unlawfully are fully entitled to the protections of due process and equal protection, as the U.S. supreme court held in Plyler v. Doe (1982)

June 24, 2018 6:33 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

There's one thing Trump was right about:

He could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous would still defend him.

June 24, 2018 6:34 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

So, if the bankruptcy king wants to do away with due process seeing as the majority of Americans oppose him they ought to feel free to march on the whitehouse and remove him and exile him.

June 24, 2018 6:38 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Yep, Trump's gone full on Nazi!

June 24, 2018 6:38 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

This got the cartoonist fired. Share it.

June 24, 2018 6:42 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The ACLU: "What President Trump has suggested here is both illegal and unconstitutional. Any official who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws should disavow it unequivocally."

June 24, 2018 6:46 PM  
Anonymous Mister Bumface said...

Mister Bumface™
@misterbumface
The Holocaust was legal. Slavery was legal. Segregation was legal.

The brave woman who cared for and hid my 6 year-old aunt in an attic in Budapest was a criminal. She broke the law by sheltering Juden.

Legality is not a guide for morality.
10:06 PM - Jun 19, 2018

https://twitter.com/misterbumface?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2018%2F6%2F21%2F1774234%2F--The-Holocaust-was-legal

June 24, 2018 7:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The depths of Trump's ignorance are profound"

many things are profound to Priya the Foreign Trollbot

"Even those who are admittedly in the States unlawfully are fully entitled to the protections of due process and equal protection, as the U.S. supreme court held in Plyler v. Doe (1982)"

they can have their day in court

they can come back in on the day of the hearing and be escorted there

"So, if the bankruptcy king wants to do away with due process seeing as the majority of Americans oppose him they ought to feel free to march on the whitehouse and remove him and exile him."

look at the foreign troll try to encourage armed insurrection in the United States

if the democratically elected Congress feels Trump has failed to discharge his duites faithfully, they can impeach him

"Yep, Trump's gone full on Nazi!"

it's so sad when a person is their own worst enemy

such it is with Priya the Foreign Trollbot

June 24, 2018 9:54 PM  
Anonymous nefarious echoes said...

As former top FBI official Peter Strzok faces congressional requests to testify, it’s worth examining who he is.

Strzok is the subject of what I see as one of the most damaging conclusions in the DOJ inspector general report: As the nation’s top FBI counterespionage official, he indicated “a willingness to take official action to impact Donald Trump’s electoral prospects.”

Specifically, while working on the Hillary classified email investigation in August 2016, Strzok wrote that he and unnamed others would “stop” Trump from getting elected. He shared his intentions with at least one other FBI official, attorney Lisa Page.

Strzok isn’t just any rank-and-file guy spouting off in one ill-advised email. His fingerprints were on every FBI investigation that stood to impact Clinton’s presidential candidacy or to hurt Trump before and after the 2016 election.

He was chief of the FBI’s Counterespionage Section and number two in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. He led the team of investigators in the Clinton classified email probe and led the FBI investigation into alleged Russian interference in the election. He was involved in the controversial anti-Trump “Steele dossier” used, in part, to obtain multiple secret wiretaps. He was the one who interviewed Trump adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who pled guilty to lying to the FBI only to later learn that agents reportedly didn’t think he’d lied. And Strzok was the “top” FBI agent appointed to work on the team of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate alleged Trump-Russia collusion.

The earth-shattering finding on Strzok by the IG confirms a citizenry’s worst fears: A high-ranking government intel official allegedly conspired to affect the outcome of a U.S. presidential election.

It’s also directly relevant to the FBI investigations of Trump-Russia collusion, which the IG did not examine in this report. There are multiple allegations of FBI misbehavior in that inquiry, including conspiracies to frame Trump, and improper spying on Trump associates. Investigating those allegations takes on an added sense of urgency with news that the FBI’s top counterespionage official expressed willingness to use his official position against a political enemy.

Yet, for all of that, Strzok is still collecting a salary, courtesy of taxpayers, at the FBI Human Resources Department. And here’s the chilling part: If it weren’t for the IG's investigation, requested by Congress, he’d likely still be helping lead special counsel Mueller’s investigation of Trump today.

The IG says he cannot be certain that all of Strzok’s text messages were recovered.

June 25, 2018 6:03 AM  
Anonymous al franken's doing stand-up now said...

The IG's report found that:

- Strzok showed bias in his decision to prioritize the Trump-Russia investigation over the Clinton probe.

- His texts “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made [re: Clinton and Trump-Russia probes] were impacted by bias or improper considerations,” “appeared to mix political opinions with discussions about” the Clinton classified email probe, and included “statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for candidate Clinton.

- “Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the [Trump]-Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review.”

- Strzok had a “biased state of mind but, even more seriously … a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” and demonstrated behavior “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”

- He brought “discredit" to himself, “sowed doubt about the FBI’s handling” of the Clinton classified email probe and “impacted the reputation of the FBI.”

- The damage “extends far beyond the scope” of the Clinton probe and “goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral fact-finding and political independence.”

- He showed “extremely poor judgment” and “a gross lack of professionalism.”

- He used personal digital accounts for FBI business.

If you're still not sure what to think, read the IG report for yourself: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download.

June 25, 2018 6:08 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

A Week’s Worth of Lies and Absurdity from Donald Trump

John Harwood of CNBC has a brief rundown of some of the more ridiculous claims made by Donald Trump this week. Tracking all the lies and absurdities he spouts is more than a full-time job. As Harwood says, his statements show that he lives in “a world detached from reality.” For example:

At 6 a.m., Trump sought to contrast his immigration policies with Germany’s, tweeting crime “is way up” there. German government data show crime at a 25-year-low.

And then there’s the usual dishonest gloating about the exact opposite of reality:

“The whole world is looking up to the U.S.,” he declared, making the country “respected again.” Gallup reports that the worldwide image of U.S. leadership is weaker than at any point under presidents George W. Bush or Barack Obama.

At this point, Trump is a lot like those old Bob Uecker commercials — “I must be in the front row.” He strides around the world thinking everyone loves him when polls in virtually every country in the world show that they despise him and think he’s a danger to us all. And he is. And those were just from Monday. He kept it up on Tuesday:

Justifying his tariffs, Trump said the US suffers a trade deficit with Canada. U.S. government data shows the opposite.

Citing a newspaper report, Trump said Canadians smuggle shoes from the U.S. to avoid import tariffs. Neither Canada nor the U.S. imposes tariffs on shoes made in the other country.

Facts are fake news, obviously. Because anything that conflicts with Trump’s lies is clearly fake news. [lol, just like Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous!]

Trump claimed credit for adding 3.4-million jobs since Election Day 2016 – which “nobody would have believed” back then. Since 4.1 million jobs were created in the previous 19 months, the claim makes no sense.

Math is a liberal lie! This is straight out of the Saul Alinsky playbook, citing your “numbers” and “statistics” to discredit a good, God-fearing man like Donald Trump! And you’ll rue the day, you commie pinko. God is going to punish you so hard for your silly “math” used to attack his Anointed One!

And that was just the first two days of the week.

June 25, 2018 12:40 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case Involving Bigoted Christian Florist


For the second time this term, the Supreme Court didn’t rule on the merits of a case involving a Christian business owner refusing to service gay customers. Weeks ago, with the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision, the justices said the process by which a Colorado commission punished a Christian baker was unfair to him, thereby giving him a hollow victory.

This morning, the justices punted on an equally infamous case involving Barronelle Stutzman, a florist who wouldn’t provide flowers for a same-sex wedding.

The Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled in 2017 that Stutzman broke the state’s anti-discrimination law. Selling flowers for a gay wedding, they said, was no less an endorsement of homosexuality than flowers for an Islamic or atheist wedding. She even admitted that herself.

While the U.S. Supreme Court considered her case, they decided today not to hear it next term, instead asking the Washington Supreme Court to give it another look in light of SCOTUS’ ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop.

While conservatives are calling that a victory of sorts, it doesn’t necessarily mean Stutzman is off the hook. The state’s ruling against her didn’t say the process was unfair to her; they said Stutzman was just being a flat-out bigot. She refused to sell a gay customer the very same thing she would’ve sold a straight one. It’s not like the customer was asking for special gay flowers spelling out the words “Homosexuality is the best!” Had he not been gay, he would’ve received the products he wanted to pay for. It’s as simple as that.

To reconsider her case with Masterpiece in mind doesn’t change those facts, and it’s hard to see why they would rule any differently this time around.

As the Washington Post notes about the original ruling, there was nothing in it suggesting a biased process against the owner of Arlene’s Flowers:

In its decision, the Washington Supreme Court said it agreed with the couple’s assertion in a brief that “this case is no more about access to flowers than civil rights cases in the 1960s were about access to sandwiches.”

It added that public accommodation laws do more than guarantee access to goods and services.

“Instead, they serve a broader societal purpose: eradicating barriers to the equal treatment of all citizens in the commercial marketplace,” the justices wrote. “Were we to carve out a patchwork of exceptions for ostensibly justified discrimination, that purpose would be fatally undermined.”

There is no rational justification for discriminating against LGBT people

June 25, 2018 2:04 PM  
Anonymous How's that tariff war going, stupid IQ45 said...

Facing higher costs from tariffs, Harley-Davidson said it is shifting production of motorcycles sold to European customers from the United States to another site offshore.

The European Union imposed tariffs on a range of U.S. products in response to similar levies that President Trump put on steel and aluminum from Europe. The E.U. tariffs will add $2,200 to the cost of an average motorcycle, threatening “an immediate and lasting detrimental impact to its business,” the company said Monday in filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

For the rest of this year, the company said the tariffs will add $30 million to $45 million to its expenses. Rather than pass on those costs to consumers in higher prices, Harley said it would absorb them for now while it begins planning to move production offshore. The full-year tariff bill could reach $100 million, the company said.

“Increasing international production to alleviate the EU tariff burden is not the company’s preference, but represents the only sustainable option to make its motorcycles available to customers in the EU and maintain a viable business in Europe,” the company said.

The news sent the company’s share price down by nearly 6 percent in midday trading in New York. Harley’s decline came amid broader market weakness that saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average fall nearly 400 points or more than 1.5 percent.

Edward Alden, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said the decision undermined the president’s claim that his “America First” trade stance would benefit manufacturing workers.

“If Trump’s trade policies are leading an iconic company like Harley-Davidson to move production out of the United States, then who exactly is benefiting?” Alden said. “This will pose a real challenge to the president’s core claim that his policies will lead companies to build more things in the U.S.”

Europe represents Harley’s No. 2 market, after the United States, with sales last year approaching 40,000 units. Shifting production to its non-U.S. plants will require additional investment overseas and is expected to take nine to 18 months, Harley said.

The move is among the first signs that Trump’s use of tariffs, which he has promoted as a way to boost employment in the steel and aluminum industries, is hurting other American businesses...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/06/25/harley-davidson-moves-work-offshore-to-limit-blow-from-trumps-trade-war/?utm_term=.297229f6a6c7

June 25, 2018 2:06 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Bigots try to make the case that its okay to discriminate against LGBT people because many gay men are promiscuous and have higher rates of STDs. That's logically fallacious because they also want to discriminate against monogamous gay men and lesbians who have lower rates of STDs than heterosexual couples.

Bigots dishonestly try to conflate the dangers of promiscuity with gayness but you don't see them condemning promiscuity in heterosexuals when they condemn it in gays.

Once again, there is no rational justification for discriminating against LGBT people who are harming no one.

June 25, 2018 2:34 PM  
Anonymous IG Report CONCLUSIONS said...

"If you're still not sure what to think, read the IG report for yourself: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download."

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

I. Conclusions

First, ...we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed in Chapter Five...

Second... we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey’s part...

And to finish off:

...This is not the first time the Department and the FBI have conducted a politically-charged investigation, and it will not be the last. To protect the institutions from allegations of abuse, political interference, and biased enforcement of the law, the Department and the FBI have developed policies and practices to guide their decisions...

There are many lessons to be learned from the Department’s and FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation, but among the most important is the need for Department and FBI leadership to follow its established procedures and policies even in its highest-profile and most challenging investigations. By adhering to these principles and norms, the public will have greater confidence in the outcome of the Department’s and the FBI’s decisions, and Department and FBI leaders will better protect the interests of federal law enforcement and the dedicated professionals who serve these institutions.

June 25, 2018 3:10 PM  
Anonymous IG Report CONCLUSIONS said...

Rather than "adhering to [established procedures and policies], principles and norms....the most important is the need for Department and FBI leadership to follow its established procedures and policies even in its highest-profile and most challenging investigations. By adhering to these principles and norms, the public will have greater confidence in the outcome of the Department’s and the FBI’s decisions, and Department and FBI leaders will better protect the interests of federal law enforcement and the dedicated professionals who serve these institutions."

Instead, we have a President who actively tried to stop the FBI from proceeding with its investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 US election.

June 25, 2018 3:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Bigots try to make the case that its okay to discriminate against LGBT people because many gay men are promiscuous and have higher rates of STDs."

I've never heard anyone say that. Given Priya's history, we need a verifiable quote.

We'll keep track of the time.

I have heard people say we should teach this when kids learn about homosexuality so they'll know the dangers. But teaching facts is not "discrimination".

"Bigots dishonestly try to conflate the dangers of promiscuity with gayness but you don't see them condemning promiscuity in heterosexuals when they condemn it in gays."

Promiscuity in heterosexuals has a restraint built in.

Homosexuals, whose relationships lack gender diversity, lack that restraint.

Further, due to historical and sociological factors, homosexuals feel entitled to promiscuity.

Thus, homosexual promiscuity is more random and more widesoread.

This is why the AIDS virus incubated in the gay community.

"Once again, there is no rational justification for discriminating against LGBT people who are harming no one."

no one does

they sometimes refuse to participate in promoting and encouraging homosexuality but that's different.

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

it's over 500 pages

you need to read more than the conclusion

then, you can say you thought for yourself

think how impressed the orderlies at the nut house will be!!

"Instead, we have a President who actively tried to stop the FBI from proceeding with its investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 US election."

you mean like when Trump has voluntarily handed over every scrap of evidence asked for, unlike the DOJ?

June 25, 2018 3:53 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Now that the popular vote losing pussy grabber is openly proposing to deport immigrants and split up families without due process and saying that his media critics deserve to be treated as "traitors", he has laid down the gauntlet.

He cannot be permitted to act on those dictatorial impulses if Americans want their freedoms to survive.

June 25, 2018 5:15 PM  
Anonymous Trump calls Red Hen "filthy" said...

Trump tweeted: “I always had a rule, if a restaurant is dirty on the outside, it is dirty on the inside!”

The quickest way to determine whether a restaurant is “dirty on the inside” is not to review its exterior, but to look at its health inspection reports, which, in the Red Hen’s case, are available online. The restaurant has been inspected four times since April 2014. On two of those reviews, including the most recent one in February, inspectors found no issues. The February inspector had only positive remarks for Wilkinson’s restaurant, saying, among other things, that “staff had clean uniforms/aprons and line cook had hair restrained.”

The January 2017 inspection found one “priority” item: The Red Hen, the inspector wrote, had found pickles and jams “in a hermetically sealed container [that] is not from an approved food processing plant.” The restaurant said the “jars were for decorative use only” and would take them home. End of threat.

The Red Hen’s worst inspection report came in April 2014, when the restaurant was dinged with two “critical” violations. One was for storing raw beef above ready-to-eat foods and storing raw thawing meats above cookie bars, both of which can lead to bacterial cross contamination. The other violation was for failing to put a “consume by” date on some prepared grits to make sure the product is either served within seven days to prevent harmful bacterial growth. Both issues were corrected at the time of the inspection.

Compare the Red Hen’s infractions with the most recent report at Trump International Hotel. In April, inspectors found the hotel out of compliance in nine categories, including for unsanitary food contact surfaces, improper food holding temperatures and improper storage to prevent cross contamination. The inspector also noted that Trump’s hotel license does not make any mention of a kitchen, but the property has four separate food preparation areas, including an in-room kitchen, an employee cafeteria, a banquet kitchen and a pastry kitchen. “Please contact DCRA to remedy this issue,” the inspector wrote, referring to the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, which issues business licenses.

A follow-up inspection in May found the Trump hotel still out of compliance in four areas, including a “display refrigerator [that] is not maintaining adequate food temperatures.” The inspector also found no evidence that Trump hotel had contacted DCRA to update its hotel license. And last year, the president’s resort retreat in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, was dinged for 13 code infractions.

A Washington Post staffer conducted an informal inspection at Trump’s D.C. hotel on Monday morning and found the awnings a little dusty, but the exterior otherwise fine. Inside, it was another matter. In the lobby bar, the breakfast diner found himself sitting on a velvety blue couch strewn not just with crumbs, but also with several hairs that weren’t his and multiple spots of indeterminate vintage. Also, the side of the white marble table had a reddish stain on it. It was sticky.

A similar inattention to basic housekeeping duties extended to the ground-floor men’s room, where one toilet was unflushed.

June 26, 2018 8:09 AM  
Anonymous Great business man? NOT! said...

https://dc.healthinspections.us/webadmin/DHD_431/lib/mod/inspection/paper/_paper_food_inspection_report.cfm?inspectionID=917255&wguid=1367&wgunm=sysact&wgdmn=431

https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/DOHMH-New-York-City-Restaurant-Inspection-Results/43nn-pn8j/data

http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/restaurants/article144261894.html

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-trump-mar-a-lago-health-violations-20170413-story.html

June 26, 2018 9:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

SCOTUS upholds the Trump travel ban and says pro-family groups don't hve to tell women how to kill their children

we're getting sick of winning

June 26, 2018 12:07 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Anatomy of a Racist, Fearmongering Smear Campaign

Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that some 63,000 Americans have been killed by undocumented immigrants in this country since 9/11. If that seems like an impossibly high number, that’s because it is. Phillip Bump of the Washington Post traces the origin of the number and, predictably, it’s just something Trump heard once and keeps passing along despite it being completely false. Also predictably, it came from virulently racist Rep. Steve King.

He repeated it last week at a rally, and even said that this wildly inflated number is “very low because things aren’t reported.” So where did Trump hear it? From a woman named Mary Ann Mendoza, the mother of a man who was, in fact, killed by an undocumented immigrant in a drunk driving incident. At one of the many events at which he paraded out such people, she railed against sanctuary cities and used that “statistic.”

“I never heard the number 63,000 people killed by illegal immigrants,” Trump said in response. “Is that a known figure? Is that an acknowledged —”

“It’s an average of 12 Americans a day, which is how many are killed in the United States,” Mendoza replied.

“Boy. That is some number,” Trump said. “I’ve never heard that number before. That’s an incredible number.”

I like how he pretends to care whether the number is documented, which he proves is utter B.S. by mindlessly repeating it without ever bothering to find out if it’s backed up by evidence. So where did Mendoza get that number? From racist douchebag Rep. Steve King back in 2006, who said it in both a blog post and a speech on the House floor in response to pro-immigration protests going on at the time. And how did he arrive at it? With some hilariously stupid “math.”

“The crimes that are committed by those who enter this country illegally are in significantly greater numbers than the crimes that are committed by American citizens,” King said, “to the extent that 28 percent of the inmates in our prisons in the United States are criminal aliens, 28 percent.”

June 26, 2018 1:02 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

And that number came from a GAO report, but he had to distort them enough to make them completely fake and irrelevant to get there:

“At the federal level, the number of criminal aliens incarcerated increased from about 42,000 at the end of calendar year 2001 to about 49,000 at the end of calendar year 2004 — a 15 percent increase. The percentage of all federal prisoners who are criminal aliens has remained the same over the last 3 years — about 27 percent.”

Note the caveat: federal inmates. Only about 10% of all inmates are in federal prisons because the overwhelming majority of crimes are crimes at the state level. And guess which crimes are solely federal in nature and can only result in being sent to federal prison? Immigration crimes. Here’s what King said about those numbers:

” That means then that criminal aliens are committing 28 percent of the crimes in the United States. And so that means 28 percent of the murders, 28 percent of the rapes, 28 percent of the violence and the assaults and battery, first- and second-degree murder and also manslaughter attacks are committed by criminal aliens.”

Uh, no. It doesn’t mean that. It couldn’t possibly mean that. You know the old line Christians like to use about Jesus, that he was either a liar, the lord or a lunatic? Reading that paragraph we can accurately say that King is either a liar, an idiot or a demagogue. Actually, of course, he’s all three of those things. So he takes that 28% figure from federal prisons only, the overwhelming majority of whom are there on immigration charges, falsely extrapolates it to the vast array of heinous state-level crimes and dishonestly or illogically claims that undocumented immigrants must be responsible for 28% of all the crimes that they were never even charged with, much less convicted of.

To make this number even more ridiculous, the GAO figures he used also includes all legal immigrants. And even King seems to have changed his tune on this one, at least a bit. In 2011, he offered up a very different number, claiming that there had been about 25,000 murders by undocumented immigrants since 1955. That’s about 1/10th of the rate he was claiming in 2006. But there are two things that Trump simply cannot resist in life: Big Macs and useful lies. He will repeat a useful lie over and over again until the day he dies [just like Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous!], knowing full well that his followers care as little about what is true and false as he does.

Several studies show illegal immigrants commit fewer crimes per capita than citizens born in the U.S.

June 26, 2018 1:02 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The Profoundly Stupid New Argument to Discredit Mueller Investigation

You knew that no matter what the DOJ Inspector General’s report said, Trump and his Pray-torean Guard were going to use it to try to discredit the Mueller investigation and the FBI. But the fact that they could make an argument this utterly moronic and bass-ackwards, and have it succeed with tens of millions of people, is really quite disturbing.

As Robert Mueller’s investigation has amassed more indictments, Donald Trump has increasingly retreated from any defense of the facts to insisting Mueller has no right to investigate him at all. This weekend, Trump praised a Wall Street Journal op-ed by David Rivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley, two conservative legal apparatchiks. If you want to have a road map for where Trump’s defense is headed, and the radical actions he is likely to take, Rivkin and Foley are laying it out in plain view.

1. The jumping-off point for their defense of Trump is the recent FBI Inspector General report, which lambasted former director James Comey for evading Bureau protocol and announcing the reopening of the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. While they concede that the report “found no evidence that then-FBI Director James Comey was trying to influence the election,” Comey confessed “that his election-eve decision to reopen the Clinton email investigation was motivated by a desire to protect her assumed presidency’s legitimacy.”

This finding of “bias” is the foundation for the argument. What they authors don’t acknowledge is that it was bias against Hillary Clinton. Yes, Comey was trying to safeguard the legitimacy of her presumably certain election. But what was he trying to safeguard it against? The conspiracy theories of the Republican Party, which was already ginning up a postelection campaign to discredit the election as “rigged.”

Comey erred by bending over backward to placate their paranoia. Now the far right is using Comey’s decision to break FBI protocol in order to placate Republicans as a rationale to demand breaking FBI protocol to help Republicans again, this time by quashing an investigation of Trump.

It’s an argument so stupid that anyone who can make it with a straight face deserves an Academy Award for Best Dissembling Actor. Comey’s actions at the end of the 2016 campaign clearly and undeniably hurt Hillary Clinton and probably was enough to cost her the election (though we obviously can’t ever know that for sure). Therefore, that proves how biased he was against Donald Trump, and by some bizzaro world, silly straw logic, it proves that an entirely different person now leading the investigation is also biased against Trump.

The mental gymnastics required to try to pull of this triple axel, double back flip of logic with a full twist is mind-blowing. But I bet the Russian judge will give it a perfect score.

June 26, 2018 1:07 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous said "SCOTUS upholds the Trump travel ban and says [anti-gay] groups don't hve to tell women how to kill their children".

There was no law requiring forced birth groups to tell women how to kill their children. This was about aborting zygotes which are far from being a person.

Actually what the law required was for anti-abortion operations to be honest and tell pregnant women coming in the door they aren't a licensed medical facility and that they don't do abortions. These organizations pretend to be abortion clinics to get pregnant women seeking abortions in the door and then they try to talk them out of it by telling them all manner of lies about abortion. So, yeah, once again conservatives oppose honesty.

And it was going to be a loss either way for the forced birth group. Many states passed laws requiring abortion clinics to counsel women seeking abortions against doing so, to undergo vaginal penetration to show them ultrasounds of the fetus and listen to its heartbeat. Now all those state anti-abortion laws are struck down as well. Are you sick of winning yet?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

June 26, 2018 1:22 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Harley Davidson Motorcycles to close Kansas plant and move some production to Europe thanks to Trump's trade war with the world

In response to Trump placing tariffs on steel and aluminum coming into the United States the world has responded with matching tariffs on American products. Harly Davidson estimates that the tariffs Trump provoked by the trade war Trump started would cost them $90-$100 million annually if they kept all production in the States so they're moving some of it overseas.

This is exactly what both economic experts and Harley-Davidson warned could happen after the popular vote losing pussy grabber announced his decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from EU and NATO members. The White House’s chief economic adviser, Gary Cohn, even resigned over debate on the issue. Are you tired of winning yet?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

June 26, 2018 1:41 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Mueller makes crucial headway in Russia investigation

Erik Prince gave Mueller "total access" to his devices, the latest Trump associate to cooperate with the special counsel's office on the Russia investigation.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller this week was given "total access" to the phone and computer of Trump ally Erik Prince, who met with a Russian figure allegedly linked to the Kremlin shortly after the 2016 election.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller this week was given "total access" to the phone and computer of Trump ally Erik Prince, who met with a Russian figure allegedly linked to the Kremlin shortly after the 2016 election. (CREDIT: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Special Counsel Robert Mueller this week was given “total access” to the phone and personal computer of Trump ally Erik Prince, who met with a Russian official in the Seychelles shortly after the 2016 election, ABC News reported Monday.

A spokesperson for Prince, the founder of the private security firm Blackwater who donated $250,000 to President Trump during the 2016 election through his campaign and two super PACs supporting him, confirmed the report in a statement, saying that Prince had “cooperated completely with the Special Counsel’s investigation.”

“As Mr. Prince told the Daily Beast he has spoken voluntarily with Congress and also cooperated completely with the Special Counsel’s investigation, including by providing them total access to his phones and computer,” the spokesperson stated. “Mr. Prince has a lot of opinions about the various investigations, but there is no question that they are important and serious, and so Mr. Prince will keep his opinions to himself for now and to let the investigators do their work.”

The spokesperson added that Prince was “confident” he would be able to “put these distractions to the side” once investigators finished their work.

Prince, who was allegedly attempting to establish a “backchannel” between the Trump White House and the Kremlin, according to U.S. and Arab officials, is under investigation by the special counsel’s office over that meeting, which took place on January 11, 2017, one week prior to Trump’s inauguration. He has been under investigation since March this year, and the Washington Post first reported the meeting in April 2017.

The Blackwater founder has denied that the meeting, reportedly with Kirill Dmitriev, was planned ahead of time. Prince maintains that the meeting was a chance encounter over beers, and that they made no effort to establish a backchannel, as the Post reported. Dmitriev was appointed by Russian President Vladimir Putin to run the country’s $10 billion sovereign wealth fund in December 2013.

June 26, 2018 1:48 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Monday’s development complicates things for Trump: in addition to Prince, several other Trump associates have agreed to cooperate with Mueller on the Russia investigation in recent months.

In March, the man allegedly responsible for planning the Seychelles meeting, George Nader, also agreed to cooperate with the special counsel’s office in exchange for partial immunity. According to The New York Times, Nader has numerous ties to Russia, including those within Putin’s inner circle. As Vox notes, Nader met with former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and current senior adviser Jared Kushner on several occasions after Trump’s inauguration.

Former Trump campaign officials, including Rick Gates, have also agreed to cooperate with Mueller in exchange for lighter sentences. Gates and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort were charged last October on multiple counts, including lying to the FBI, money laundering, and conspiracy against the United States. Gates pleaded guilty to two of the charges against him — conspiracy against the United States and lying to the FBI — in February, promising to cooperate with Mueller on the Russia investigation. Manafort has repeatedly tried to get the charges against himself dropped, to no avail.

George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser for Trump’s campaign, pleaded guilty last fall to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials.
NEW YORK, NY - MAY 11: Michael Cohen, former personal attorney for U.S. President Donald Trump, exits the Loews Regency Hotel, May 11, 2018 in New York City. AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said this week that it was a mistake to hire Cohen as a consultant it was revealed they paid him $600,000 last year. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Michael Cohen dumps lawyers, sends ‘smoke signal’ to Trump

More recently, Trump’s longtime attorney, Michael Cohen, appeared ready to begin cooperating with federal prosecutors in New York as well. This development would, according to ABC News, “hit the White House, family members, staffers and counsels hard.”

Cohen has long been viewed as Trump’s “fixer” and was named in the now-infamous Steele Dossier, which detailed allegations of misconduct and possible collusion with Russian officials by Trump and several campaign associates. According to the dossier and subsequent reports by McClatchy’s D.C. bureau, Cohen allegedly traveled to Prague ahead of the election to meet with Russian officials and bury any evidence of collusion, allegations which Cohen has vehemently and repeatedly denied.

Cohen was also involved in facilitating hush-money payments to two women — Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal — who said they had sexual relationships with Trump, and were paid to keep quiet about it in the days leading up to the 2016 election.

In April, the FBI, acting on behalf of the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, raided Cohen’s home, office, and hotel room, on a referral from Mueller’s office. Agents were reportedly looking for records and documents related to the two hush-money payments, eventually seizing 3 million files, only a few hundred of which were covered by attorney-client privilege.

On June 13, ABC News reported that Cohen had dropped his legal team and was preparing to cooperate with federal investigators in exchange for leniency.

June 26, 2018 1:49 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Gee, for an investigation that's a "Hoax" there sure are a lot of charges, convictions, and guilty pleas going on!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

June 26, 2018 1:49 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Lol! Trump's whining that Harley Davidson is making him look bad for moving some of their production out of the States in order to deal with the consequences of his trade war.

That's what you get for being an arrogant moron lying Donny! You did this, you own it!

June 26, 2018 3:08 PM  
Anonymous backlash against gay agenda in Maryland said...

QLTBG candidates lose big in Maryland. Maybe they can sue the voters for discrimination:

Del. Jeff Waldstreicher of Kensington on Tuesday came out on top of what was the county’s nastiest state legislative race this year. Unsurprisingly, the BQTLG candidate turned it nasty.

With 31 of 33 precincts in District 18 reporting early Wednesday, Waldstreicher had bested Beyer—a person who has never won a political contest and was seeking to become the first transgender member of the Maryland General Assembly—in the primary contest to succeed homosexual Sen. Richard Madaleno, who failed in a bid to become the first homosexual Democratic nominee for governor. Waldstreicher, of Kensingotn, had 50 percent of the vote, 13 percent higher than Beyer, a Chevy Chase resident.

Homosexual Madaleno’s decision to give up his state Senate seat to vainly try to become the first homosexual governor set up what turned out to be the county’s most vicious state legislative contest of this year’s primary season between Waldstreicher, a guy so well liked he doesn't even have to show up for votes to get elected, and the disliked transgender Beyer of Chevy Chase, who had sought to oust homosexual Madaleno from his state senate seat four years earlier. The transgender Beyer used Trump-like tactics of making nasty attacks on her opponent, giving her opponent a derogatory nickname, and financing her own campaign. As of mid-May, Beyer had pumped up the local economy by wasting $316,000 of her own money on a hopeless contest, an amount similar to what she personally tranferred to her campaign against the homosexual Madaleno in 2014.

Madaleno campaign spokesperson Marguerite Gallorini conceded that an ad in which Madaleno kisses his husband, Mark Hodge, “engaged a lot of people.”

Madaleno got a whopping 5% of the vote!

With Madaleno’s departure from the Senate, a heterosexual is now the county’s senior senator and will chair the powerful Budget and Taxation Committee.

In county council races, Pete Fosselman was defeated, receiving only 10%. Evan Glass only got 8%.

June 27, 2018 7:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Gee, for an investigation that's a "Hoax" there sure are a lot of charges, convictions, and guilty pleas going on!"

the investigation isn't a hoax, it's an attempt to support a hoax and, since that is a nearly impossible, is busily making trivial indictments to keep its paychecks coming

June 27, 2018 7:47 AM  
Anonymous Making America Lose Again said...

From the "Predictable fallout of a totally unnecessary trade war department":

Largest U.S. Nail Manufacturer Could Soon Be Out Of Business Because Of Trump Tariffs

A nail manufacturer in the heart of Trump country says that tariffs from President Donald Trump’s escalating trade conflict are putting its business at risk.

The Mid-Continent Nail Corporation in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, said this week that it had recently laid off 60 of its 500 workers because of the hefty 25 percent tariff that the administration has slapped on steel imports from Mexico and Canada.

Mid-Continent, described as the largest nail manufacturer in the United States, had been importing Mexican steel to turn into nails state-side. The company, which was started in 1987 by two local brothers, said sales plummeted by 50 percent in just two weeks after it raised prices to cope with the elevated steel costs.

Mid-Continent spokesman James Glassman told CNN that the company is now “on the brink of extinction” unless the Commerce Department grants its request for a tariff exclusion.

As things currently stand, Glassman said the firm could shutter its doors as early as Labor Day. Another option on the table is relocating to Mexico, he said.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty and a ton of fear in Poplar Bluff,” George Skarich, the company’s vice president of sales, told The Washington Post.

Poplar Bluff is located in Butler County, where Trump won almost 80 percent of the vote in the 2016 election.

Skarich, who voted for the president, told the Post that he was “disappointed” and “sad” at what’s happening to his town and company. If he could speak to Trump, Skarich said he’d tell the president that “these tariffs aren’t hurting China, they are hurting Missouri.”

Analysts have said that though some U.S. jobs could be created because of Trump’s protectionist tariffs, many more could be at risk because of the burgeoning trade war.

For instance, while “over 26,000 steel and aluminum jobs would be created” because of Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, “higher costs from tariffs and retaliation from America’s trading partners would also mean over 495,000 jobs lost elsewhere in the economy,” said Laura Baughman, president of Trade Partnership Worldwide, in an op-ed earlier this month.

“For every American job gained, more than 18 jobs would be lost,” she said.

Well, it looks like tRump "nailed" it. American jobs in a coffin, that is.

June 27, 2018 10:28 AM  
Anonymous The times they are a'changin' said...

"homosexual Sen. Richard Madaleno, who failed in a bid to become the first homosexual Democratic nominee for governor."

The best Rich could have done was to tie for that honor with Gov. Kat Brown and now Rep. Jared Polis, who won yesterday's Democratic gubernatorial nomination in Colorado, giving him a chance to become the first openly gay man elected governor in the United States.

Polis, who sold two internet startups and is one of the wealthiest members of Congress, spent $11 million of his own money to win the primary. He defeated former state Treasurer Cary Kennedy, state Sen. Mike Johnston and Lt. Gov. Donna Lynne.

The five-term House member faces Republican state Treasurer Walker Stapleton, a Bush family cousin, in the Nov. 6 general election. Stapleton won his party’s primary in part by tying himself to President Donald Trump and promising to crack down on so-called sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with federal officials in enforcing immigration laws.

Colorado’s current governor, Democrat John Hickenlooper, is term-limited.

A Polis win over Stapleton would shatter a barrier for gay politicians and represent a major advancement for the nation’s LGBTQ community. Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat who is bisexual, assumed the chief executive post when the previous governor was forced to resign. She then became the first LGBTQ person to win a gubernatorial race in a 2016 special election.

June 27, 2018 10:39 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Don’t sleep on Robert Mueller and the Russia probe: It’s about to get hot for Donald Trump

High anxiety for Team Trump: A Democratic senator says, “Buckle up!” Big news from Mueller probe could be coming


I've written before about the fact that Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is no bomb-throwing partisan. Yet last December he very ostentatiously gave a big speech on the floor of the Senate that caused more than a few ripples across the political media by drawing a "red line" at the possible firing of Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The timing was weird, right before Christmas. Nobody knew of any reason why he would do that out of the blue.

It was later reported in The New York Times that right around that time Trump had gone ballistic and was threatening to fire Mueller over a report that he had demanded Trump Organization records from Deutsche Bank. It turned out that report was erroneous and Trump's lawyers were able to talk him out of it. But news of his tantrum must have reached beyond the White House, since Warner felt the necessity to go to the floor and warn him off.

So Warner knows things. Politico reported a little nugget of political gossip on Sunday that made Russia-investigation watchers sit up and take notice:

SEN. MARK WARNER (D-Va.) hosted a dinner Friday night for more than 100 guests at his house on Martha’s Vineyard as part of the DSCC’S annual Majority Trust retreat. OVERHEARD: Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, joking to the crowd: “If you get me one more glass of wine, I’ll tell you stuff only Bob Mueller and I know. If you think you’ve seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It’s going to be a wild couple of months.”

Nobody's sure exactly what Warner was hinting at, and he says he was just joking. But there have been a number of clues over the past couple of weeks that the investigation is picking up speed.

Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, is now sitting in jail contemplating his future while his lawyers present a flurry of different arguments to spring him, none of which have been successful so far. Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, is reportedly getting ready to cooperate with the feds in his case in New York, and Mueller is said to be eyeing his involvement very closely. Erik Prince, the former Blackwater CEO who seems to have turned up in numerous meetings with Russians and Middle Eastern potentates offering "back channels" during the presidential campaign, told the press that he's "cooperating" with the Mueller probe and has turned over his phone and computer to investigators.

June 27, 2018 12:39 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump's old friend Roger Stone is reportedly in Mueller's crosshairs and is considered most likely to be the next person indicted. (This piece by Marcy Wheeler explains just how much trouble Stone may be in and how his case is a likely template for others.)

Then there are the spicy rumors like Warner's and this little number by BBC journalist Paul Wood late last week:

"An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election. They had had the Clinton campaign emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks: ‘What should I do?’ Take this to Mueller, the lawyer replied."

Again, this could just be idle gossip, but it might explain why the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, approached WikiLeaks out of the blue in June of 2016, offering to help them "catalog" emails that hadn't been released yet. If this is true, it's a big deal and could implicate Brad Parscale, the man who ran Trump's digital operation in 2016 and who has already been tapped as his campaign manager for 2020.

Those are just a few examples of recent reports of activity in the investigation. Perhaps they don't add up to much individually, but when you combine them with the behavior of the president, it starts to look as though the pressure really is increasing. For instance:

Trump tweets about the “witch hunt” (Updated)

May 2017: 3 times
June 2017: 5 times
July 2017: 6 times
Oct 2017: 1 time
Dec 2017: 2 times
Jan 2018: 1 time
Feb 2018: 3 times
March 2018: 2 times
April 2018: 9 times
May 2018: 20 times
June 2018: 24 times (as of 8:43am on 6/25)

June 27, 2018 12:40 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump also did his usual shtick, bragging incessantly about his fantasy accomplishments while blaming others for all possible problems. But he was clearly distracted and unable to keep one train of thought going. He isn't himself.

Signs of panic are showing among the Trump loyalists as well. CNN reported that the president's most dedicated lieutenants in the House are pushing feverishly for the various investigating committees to work faster and take action against the Justice Department as quickly as possible. They've accelerated their smear campaign against Mueller's office and continue to harass the DOJ to provide evidence in the ongoing case, for the obvious purpose of illegally sharing it with Trump, exposing it or discrediting it in advance of any legal proceedings. The department is sharing some documents in what appears to be a strategy to buy time.

The Atlantic's Natasha Bertrand reported on Republicans' parallel strategy to build on the discredited "Spygate" non-scandal by pushing the idea that anyone in the Trump campaign shown to have interacted or conspired with Russian agents was actually the victim of an FBI frame-up. Rudy Giuliani has used that exact language in the press.

This all seems to be aimed at public opinion, which, as Giuliani helpfully explained some time back, is in service of preventing the required two-thirds vote in the Senate in a possible impeachment trial. That's a remarkably pessimistic view from the president's lawyer of where this is headed.

This is all speculation, of course. Mueller's actual investigation is sealed up tight as a drum. But there looks to be considerable agitation among people associated with various pieces of the puzzle. As Sen. Warner said, "Buckle up."

June 27, 2018 12:40 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Since Trump took office:

Americans killed by refugees from banned countries: 0

Americans killed by Americans with guns: 22,558

The Muslim ban is not about keeping Americans safe. Its about Trump appealing to his racist base

In the second version of the Muslim ban the Trump administration actually ordered itself to do a study on the net cost of refugees to the American people. The study done by the Trump administration found out that over the past 10 years, refugees have netted $63 billion TO the U.S. economy.

---------------------------------------

Conservatives falsely compare refusing Sarah Sanders service to ‘Masterpiece Cakeshop’

"White House officials are not part of a protected class under the law".

I agree with the article from a legal perspective, but as a matter of principle and what "should be" law I think the Red Hen should have served Huckabee-Sanders.

There is however, a case to be made that it is appropriate to deny service to Huckabee-Sanders but not appropriate to refuse to sell a wedding cake to a same sex couple.

The same sex couple is harming no one and thus are behaving morally, so logically one can't refuse to serve them by falsely claiming they are behaving immorally. Huckabee-Sanders on the other hand is harming countless people by lying to promote government actions that prevent them from getting healthcare due to pre-existing conditions, cut medicare and medicaid, eliminate limits on pollution that will kill thousands, and so on - thus one could truthfully say "I don't want to serve her because of her immoral actions".

June 27, 2018 12:42 PM  
Anonymous Blogger said...

Blogger is on the fritz.

June 27, 2018 1:26 PM  
Anonymous Progressive wins said...

1. Former NAACP head Ben Jealous launched his bid for governor of Maryland last year and quickly won the endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the crotchety grandfather of the modern progressive political moment. There was one problem: Sanders hadn’t won the Democratic primary in Maryland, losing by more than 30 percentage points as the Democratic establishment in the state lined up behind Hillary Clinton.

On Tuesday night, Jealous, who had been a frequent surrogate for Sanders and helped run his Maryland operation, defeated the establishment’s pick in the governor’s race, Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker, by 10 percentage points. Baker was backed by House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, former Gov. Martin O’Malley and other top Maryland Democrats.

Jealous, a former field organizer, flipped the script by massively improving on Sanders’ performance with black voters. Sanders lost the city of Baltimore by 30 percentage points. Jealous won it by 24 percentage points. And he did it while promising to legalize marijuana and implement Medicare for all in the state.

“I am not running to the left,” Jealous said in his victory speech. “I am not running to the right. I am running towards the people of our state. Health care, education, ending mass incarceration, ending the student debt crisis and protecting the environment are people issues.”

2. Voters in Oklahoma passed a state ballot question legalizing medical marijuana, making it the 30th state to do so. Under the law, adults with a medical marijuana license will be able to possess up to 8 ounces of the drug, and doctors will have wide leeway in recommending the drug to patients.

3. Rep. Jared Polis isn’t the staunchest of progressives. A former internet entrepreneur and one of the wealthiest members of Congress, he’s a member of both the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the center-left New Democrat Coalition, two groups that often find themselves clashing.

But Polis, who won Colorado’s Democratic gubernatorial nomination on Tuesday night and will be the first gay man ever elected to a governorship if he beats Republican Walker Stapleton in the fall, also ran on a platform to the left of his Democratic predecessor, the term-limited Gov. John Hickenlooper.

Polis campaigned on a state-level Medicare-for-all plan and promised to move the state to 100 percent renewable energy by 2040 and fully fund all-day kindergarten. He’s the favorite to win in November.

June 27, 2018 2:14 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Geez, several hours since Supreme court judge Anthony Kennedy retired and no gloating yet by Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous - maybe they died?

June 27, 2018 3:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My apologies, Priya. I'm in travel status and wasn't even aware. In the words of Michael Jackson, maybe tomorrow

June 27, 2018 6:02 PM  
Anonymous Americans favor abortion rights said...

At the time of Scalia’s death, then-President Barack Obama had nominated Judge Merrick Garland to fill Scalia’s seat. But he was blocked by Senate Republicans, who refused to approve a Supreme Court nominee during a presidential election year.

On Wednesday, Democrats called on Republicans to refrain from picking a new Supreme Court justice this close to the midterm elections. But Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) indicated they would move swiftly to replace Kennedy. A top priority of Republican voters and politicians has been to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that a women’s right to an abortion, with certain limitations, fell within her right to privacy under the 14th Amendment.

May 2018: 79% say abortion should be legal under any (29%) or only under certain (50%) circumstances. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx

June 28, 2018 8:29 AM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

"At the time of Scalia’s death, then-President Barack Obama had nominated Judge Merrick Garland to fill Scalia’s seat. But he was blocked by Senate Republicans, who refused to approve a Supreme Court nominee during a presidential election year.

On Wednesday, Democrats called on Republicans to refrain from picking a new Supreme Court justice this close to the midterm elections."

this is not a presidential election year

during the 2016 election, the two main issues were the Supreme Court and the plight of blue collar workers in the Rust Belt

the American people, in the majority of states, voted against Merrick Garland

"But Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) indicated they would move swiftly to replace Kennedy."

this will make the Constitution safe for a generation

"A top priority of Republican voters and politicians has been to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that a women’s right to an abortion, with certain limitations, fell within her right to privacy under the 14th Amendment."

Roe v Wade is preposterous

no serious legal scholar would deny that it is irrational

Roe v Wade is also gone

"May 2018: 79% say abortion should be legal under any (29%) or only under certain (50%) circumstances. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx"

just because it is not a constitutional right doesn't mean it can't be legalized

if they think that, elect people who feel the same

legalized child killing is not popular

certain people feel slimy voting for it and preferred the judges to take the moral responsibility

that tells you something

June 28, 2018 9:51 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Conservative supreme court justices rule based on desired policy outcomes, not on the law

So, Trump's lackies on the Supreme court upheld his Muslim ban and in doing so they contradicted their own justification for ruling in favour of the bigoted cake baker. In the case against the bigoted cake baker the conservative justices based their judgment on the alleged anti-christian statements by the Colorado commission who made the original ruling. They really strained to find evidence of bias in a couple of basic statements of fact about the discrimination that should have been uncontroversial (i.e. that religion has historically been used to justify bigotry). But in the case of the Muslim ban the same justices said all the statements by Trump that his goal was to ban Muslims from the U.S. should be ignored and were declared irrelevant to the constitutionality of Trump's Muslim ban. The contradiction could not be more obvious.

Studies on the rulings of conservative vs liberal justices show that liberal justices consistently apply an approach in line with “the original concerns of the Framers of the Constitution and in their distinctive understanding of the special responsibility of courts in our constitutional system,” while the Court’s conservatives’ “votes cannot be explained by any consistent theory of constitutional interpretation” but are instead driven by their own policy preferences.

Conservatives really lack any consistent rational moral code.

June 28, 2018 12:44 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Roanoke Times reporter Amy Friedenberger is tweeting live from a protest outside the Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia where one screaming man is holding a sign saying “LGBT: Let God Burn Them.”

But, hey, they don't hate gays, they "love" them! "And they'll know we are christians by our love, by our love!".

Conservatives are profoundly hypocritical, demanding that businesses be able to discriminate against gays but not against them.

According to the reporter, one disorderly conduct arrest has already been made. As I noted yesterday, the restaurant’s owner, family, and employees have been hit with a deluge of doxxing and death threats since the ejection of Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Police have preemptively closed the street outside the Red Hen in the event the situation worsens.

June 28, 2018 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Republican Senators Want National Science Foundation Investigated for Spreading Propaganda said...

Have you heard? We have a propaganda problem! No, I don’t mean the constant string of lies coming from the White House and their friends at Fox News, I’m referring to those darned government scientists who keep warning people about the dangers of climate change.

That’s the contention of four conservative senators, anyway. After learning about a grant funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) that helps American meteorologists to include information on global warming into their local televised weather reports, the lawmakers are raising a stink that this program, called Climate Matters, amounts to propaganda.

Those four lawmakers are notorious climate change deniers/fossil fuel allies Senators Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, James Lankford and Jim “How can there be climate change when I’m holding a snowball?” Inhofe. In a joint letter, the senators wrote:

“It is unacceptable for federal agencies to support such research which attempts to convince individuals to adopt a particular viewpoint rather than conducting objective research examining a given topic.”

Oh, bulls***. These legislators don’t give a damn about research—we have decades worth of objective research overwhelmingly pointing to the reality and harms of climate change, yet it doesn’t fit these senators’ agendas and now they’re trying to obfuscate the truth.

Responding to the senators, the NSF insisted that the grant went through a thorough review process to ensure the science being taught to meteorologists met the highest standards. The group does promise to reexamine the program in the upcoming months in light of the lawmakers’ objections, however.

Unfortunately, the GOP might win out on this issue, depending on whether the NSF’s inspector general considers the program a violation of the Hatch Act – a law you’ve probably heard of thanks to Kellyanne Conway’s unethical ways. Amongst other provisions, the Hatch Act forbids government agencies from partaking in partisan pursuits.

The debate, of course, is whether it’s “partisan” for scientists and meteorologists to be worried about climate change. Given that climate change is going to be devastating for the entire planet, it sure doesn’t seem like it should be labeled “partisan.” If it is deemed partisan, it’s only because the Republicans have managed to frame the issue as a supposed debate.

As for the whole “propaganda” claim, that’s just ludicrous. The 500+ American meteorologists that have participated in the suddenly controversial Climate Matters tutorials aren’t using their news segments to preach about climate change, but rather contextualize extreme weather events with scientific explanations. Since climate change is so rarely mentioned on the news, weather reports seem like a perfect opportunity to acknowledge it in an educational manner without getting political about it.

The real propaganda at play is the conservative senators continued insistence that climate change, a very serious threat to the environment that scientists are virtually unanimous about, is somehow something that cannot be agreed upon. As the Huffington Post reminds us, “The GOP is the only political party in the developed world to make climate change denial a platform issue.”

June 28, 2018 1:32 PM  
Anonymous Jim Jordan reveals just how nutty Republicans have become said...

President Trump is not the only unhinged Republican who spins conspiracy theories and denigrates the rule of law. Watching Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) rudely (civility police, where are you?) and hysterically attack Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, accusing him without proof of threatening staffers — and insisting that Congress, an appendage of Trump at this point, get classified documents from an ongoing investigation — recalls the moment when the Army’s chief counsel, Joseph Welch, responded to the vicious smear launched by Sen. Joe McCarthy (R-Wis.) at a witness during the 1954 Army-McCarthy hearings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16&v=fqQD4dzVkwk

In the case of Jordan, it was Rosenstein himself who was forced to respond, again and again, to baseless accusations and inaccuracies. The Post records the exchange:

At the hearing, Jordan peppered Rosenstein with accusations, asking, “Why are you keeping information from Congress?”

Rosenstein denied doing so.

“I don’t agree with you, congressman,” he said. “That is not accurate, sir.”

Jordan also accused the deputy attorney general of redacting documents to hide information embarrassing to the FBI.

“Mr. Jordan, I am the deputy attorney general of the United States. I’m not the person doing the redacting,” Rosenstein answered.

As Jordan peppered him with questions, Rosenstein snapped back: “Your use of this to attack me personally is deeply wrong. … I’m not trying to hide anything.”

Jordan responded: “It’s not personal,” as the two continued to argue and Democrats on the panel attempted to interject in Rosenstein’s defense.

Watch for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0Etlf4tc0s

At one point, Jordan accused Rosenstein of threatening to subpoena phone calls. Rosenstein dryly responded that there is no such thing. Laughter broke out in the room.

The sight of a calm, methodical deputy attorney general, patiently answering an unhinged inquisitor’s accusations (followed by interruptions so Rosenstein couldn’t answer), was bracing. Jordan is the perfect incarnation of the GOP in 2018 — unhinged, bullying, unbound by facts and unconcerned with the norms of democratic government. A subsequent, unenforceable House resolution demanding Rosenstein comply with a request for documents concerning the investigation was the perfect coda to a kangaroo-court hearing. And the person responsible for allowing this travesty to go on is House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), who exerts no control over his members.

Democratic House candidates might consider running the Jordan video in their ads. It is a vivid display of a party that refuses to fulfill its constitutional functions and aids and abets the president’s attacks on the rule of law. Every Republican elected will vote for his or her speaker (or minority leader), thereby giving consent to put committee gavels in the hands of irresponsible and irrational puppets of the White House. If voters want to check the kind of embarrassing and destructive conduct we saw today and restrain an increasingly out of control president, they’d best not reward House Republicans by preserving their majority.

June 28, 2018 1:51 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump IS like Hitler!

GOP strategist Steve Schmidt said Tuesday that President Trump’s “only affinity for reading anything were the Adolf Hitler speeches he kept on his nightstand” during an appearance on “Morning Joe.” Schmidt, Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) campaign manager in 2008, also said Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton was a fluke.

“So in the 240th year of the independence of the United States, in three states by 78,000 votes, the American people by a fluke elected an imbecilic former reality TV show host and con man whose only affinity for reading anything were the Adolf Hitler speeches he kept on his night stand,” Schmidt told co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

Its no coincidence Trump calls Mexicans criminals and rapists, refers to Latino immigrants as "animals" who "infest" the United States - that's straight out of Hitler's playbook to dehumanize the Jews.

Republicans whine about it being unfair to compare Trump and his administration to Hitler and the Nazis but the comparison is spot on.

June 28, 2018 2:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"GOP strategist Steve Schmidt said Tuesday that Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton was a fluke."

not a fluke at all

Hillary was an extremely poor candidate, not Presidential material at all

the only reason it was close was because Trump is disliked personally

“So in the 240th year of the independence of the United States,"

what does this add to his statement?

"man whose only affinity for reading anything were the Adolf Hitler speeches he kept on his night stand,”

he's been in Trump's bedroom?

I think this is a joke

"Its no coincidence Trump calls Mexicans criminals and rapists,"

he actually didn't do that

go back and look at the statement issued

he said too many of the immigrants from Mexico were criminals and rapists

he pointedly said some are "good people"

as for Mexicans in general, he said they were sending the bad ones, which would presume that those in Mexico are not "bad"

so the statement, "Its no coincidence Trump calls Mexicans criminals and rapists," is a lie

that's not surprising since Priya the Foreign Trollbot posted it

Priya the Foreign Trollbot has been shown to be lying several times recently

"refers to Latino immigrants as "animals" who "infest" the United States"

actually, even the mainstream liberal media who originally reported this dialed it back

he said MS-13 gang members were animals

"that's straight out of Hitler's playbook to dehumanize the Jews."

really?

give us the quote from Hitler's playbook that says this

we'll keep track of how you take

June 28, 2018 3:17 PM  
Anonymous a little humor for a Thursday afternoon said...

"Yesterday's Supreme Court news changed EVERYTHING. We've never needed to stand strong together as progressives more than we do right now. If a Trump appointee is allowed to take Justice Kennedy's place, the damage that will be done to women's rights, racial justice, and the core of our democracy will take generations to reverse. But some centrist Democrats are already wavering. Read Jim's urgent message, then sign DFA's petition telling Congress that there must be NO Supreme Court before voters have their say in November. -- Karli Wallace Thompson, Senior Digital Manager, Democracy for America

Progressives --

I can’t sugar coat this one: This is a nightmare.

Justice Anthony Kennedy just announced his retirement, meaning Donald Trump will be able to nominate his replacement. This will be catastrophic for women's rights, racial justice, economic equality and our most basic democratic processes.

It will give Trump, his plutocratic friends, and corporate special interests the ability to essentially do anything they want -- with legal cover.

Unless we fight back.

Sign Democracy for American’s emergency petition demanding Congressional Democrats and moderate Republicans wage an all-out campaign to shut down Trump’s ability to nominate Kennedy’s successor.

For far too long, Democrats and moderate Republicans have played by rules that right-wing ideologues like Mitch McConnell threw out the window a long time ago.

After Justice Scalia’s death, Mitch McConnell STOLE a Supreme Court seat, allowing Donald Trump to appoint Neil Gorsuch -- who just this morning was the deciding vote in a rule that gutted public sector unions.

No more. We cannot expect to win when we fight with one hand tied behind our back. The outcome of this Supreme Court fight will impact issues that we, as progressives, believe are fundamental constitutional rights for decades to come. We have to go all out here.

Add your signature to DFA's petition calling on Congress to stop Trump from nominating Kennedy’s successor before the midterms.

Let’s be clear: President Trump and much of his administration are under active investigation right now. The country has largely turned against them. In election after election, people vote in droves to support progressive candidates who are promising to do everything possible to stop this administration.

Just yesterday, progressives won huge victories in Maryland and New York -- not by timidly caving to Trump’s agenda, but by standing up to Trump and speaking loudly and passionately about our progressive vision for this country. That’s how we win!

And that’s what we have to do here: From the grassroots to Democratic leaders in Congress and everyone in between, we have to fight.

Congress has the ability to stop this lawless, unpopular president from selecting another Supreme Court nominee. They cannot sit on their hands and do nothing when it is abundantly clear that the American people oppose Trump’s agenda.

Sign our urgent petition now calling on every member of Congress -- especially Democrats and moderate Republicans -- to stand and refuse to allow this president to nominate his SCOTUS replacement before the midterms.

Gear up. We have an important fight ahead of us and we can’t afford to leave anything on the field when it’s over. Thanks for everything you do.

- Jim

Jim Dean, Chair
Democracy for America"

June 28, 2018 4:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

that Jim Dean is one of the funniest comedians of the 21st century!!

June 28, 2018 4:07 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump tax cuts carry a big price tag: Huge debt and risk of another financial crisis, non-partisan Congressional budget office warns

The tax cuts championed by President Trump are helping push the nation toward an unprecedented level of debt, heightening the risk of another financial crisis, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The budget office’s annual look at the government’s long-term financial outlook paints a grim picture, projecting soaring deficits in the coming years, with debt ultimately peaking at more than 152% of the nation’s gross domestic product.

“The prospect of large and growing debt poses substantial risks for the nation and presents policy makers with significant challenges,” Keith Hall, director of the budget office, said in a statement.

The federal debt currently stands at about $15 trillion, or 78% of the size of U.S. economy. If current trends continue, it will roughly equal the size of the economy within a decade, the budget office said. The last time the debt burden hit that level was just after World War II.

The biggest problem in the coming decade stems from last year’s tax cut. It is estimated to increase the deficit by more than $2.3 trillion over the decade.

And that’s under an optimistic scenario. Under the tax law, individual income tax rates are slated to increase sharply at the end of the decade, while corporate taxes remain low. If Congress allows that individual tax hike to take effect, the tax cut’s long-term impact on the debt will begin to fade after the next 10 years.

But if Congress balks at that big tax increase — many members of Congress already have said they want to make the individual cuts permanent — the red ink would be even worse than projected, the budget office said.

The budget office did not offer a specific projection of the more pessimistic scenario, but the bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an advocacy group, crunched the numbers and found that if the individual cuts were kept in place, federal debt would be twice the size of the nation’s economy, and annual deficits would exceed 13% of the GDP over the next 30 years.

June 28, 2018 4:25 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The impact of the tax cut comes on top of a preexisting problem — the spiraling price of providing subsidized healthcare and Social Security for the huge baby boom generation as it moves into retirement, the budget office said.

Most of the rest of government spending is projected to decline, relative to the size of the economy, the report said. The one big exception is interest payments, which will rise as the debt increases.

Debt at the level the U.S. is currently piling up could have serious consequences, the budget office warns. The high level of red ink increases the likelihood of a fiscal crisis, threatens to reduce the income of average Americans, and gives lawmakers limited options to deal with big events that require a government response, such as another deep recession.

Rising debt also threatens to weaken the global power of the United States as it increasingly depends on foreign investors to lend money to the Treasury, the report noted.

What makes the rapidly increasing debt particularly striking is that it’s happening at a time when the U.S. is at peace and the economy is booming. The previous high point for the debt came when the nation was deep in the red from the effort to win the world war and the public works projects implemented in response to the Depression.

More recently, the U.S. plunged back into a high debt to combat the Great Recession, when Congress passed major spending increases to pull the nation out of it. But Washington not only failed to wipe out the red ink when the economy rebounded, after a few years of progress in President Obama’s second term, the government under Trump has reversed course, moving toward even higher debt levels.

Many economists feel that borrowing money to cope with an emergency of that sort makes sense — ultimately, the country emerges better off. But a big increase in the debt in the absence of any such emergency is more problematic.

June 28, 2018 4:26 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

For the next decade, the national debt is projected to surge, bringing the nation into uncharted territory unless the government adopts far-reaching policy shifts that could include deep cuts in spending on entitlement programs or significant tax increases.

The report lays out precisely what it would cost to keep the long-term debt from soaring.

To bring the red ink down to the historical average level, taxes would need to increase 17% -- $2,000 per household -- or government spending would need to be cut by 15%. Over the last 50 years, federal debt has average about 41% of the gross domestic product.

Just keeping the federal debt at its current, historically high level would require increasing taxes by 11% — $1,300 per household — or cutting spending by 10%.

The heavy level of debt is already taking a toll on taxpayers. The report projects that [current]government borrowing costs are on track to exceed the amount the government spends each year on Social Security.

One of the biggest problems posed by rising debt levels is the way it handcuffs the government’s ability to respond to emergencies, the report notes.

Lawmakers had flexibility to respond to the Great Recession because the federal debt at that time was below 40% of the GDP — nearly half what it is now.

“If another recession or fiscal crisis occurred and federal debt was at its current level or higher, the government might have a more difficult time implementing similar costly actions in response,” the report warned.

June 28, 2018 4:26 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

CALIFORNIA: Mother Suspected In Torture Death Of Ten Year Old Who Reportedly Said He “Liked Boys”

Anthony Avalos came out as gay in recent weeks, and authorities are now investigating whether homophobia played a role in the death of the 10-year-old Lancaster boy, a county official said. Anthony was found mortally wounded at his home last week with severe head injuries and cigarette burns covering his body.

Brandon Nichols, deputy director of the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, revealed in an interview Monday that Anthony “said he liked boys” but declined to provide more details, including whom the boy told and when. Nichols said the criminal investigation of the deadly abuse is ongoing.

Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies responded to a 911 call from his mother about 12:15 p.m. Wednesday and found the boy unresponsive inside his family’s apartment. Authorities said they were told the boy had “suffered injuries from a fall.” He died at a hospital Thursday morning. County officials removed seven other children from the home as the investigation continued.

While there have been no criminal charges in the case, Cagle says the mother’s story claiming Anthony fell and hurt his head does not pass muster. “He had a severe head injury consistent with a brain bleed, plus bruises and abrasions all about his body,” said Cagle. ” All that indicates to me that that’s non-accidental.”


RELATED: Earlier this month a California man received the death penalty for the gruesome torture death of an eight year old boy that the man and his mother reportedly believed to be gay. The mother was sentenced to life in prison.

Prosecutors said the boy’s skull was fractured, 12 of his ribs were broken, he was forced to eat cat feces, and that he slept, bound and gagged, in a cabinet.

But, hey, Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous says "The gays are doing just fine.", but of course to them anything at all that happens to gays is "just fine".

June 28, 2018 4:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The tax cuts championed by President Trump are helping push the nation toward an unprecedented level of debt,"

that's not saying much

Obama the Worse doubled the debt of all other Presidents

any addition to the debt, even one dollar, pushes "the nation toward an unprecedented level of debt"

"heightening the risk of another financial crisis, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office."

the CBO analyses aren't often realized because it must make the assumption that the law won't change

that's unlikely

anyway, debt doesn't generally cause a crisis in the short run

"The budget office’s annual look at the government’s long-term financial outlook paints a grim picture, projecting soaring deficits in the coming years, with debt ultimately peaking at more than 152% of the nation’s gross domestic product."

this is not new

raising taxes is not a good way to reduce deficits

cutting spending is much better

Trump is brimming with ideas to do that

I hate to have to tell you but the Education Department is history

“The prospect of large and growing debt poses substantial risks for the nation and presents policy makers with significant challenges,” Keith Hall, director of the budget office, said in a statement.

"The federal debt currently stands at about $15 trillion, or 78% of the size of U.S. economy. If current trends continue, it will roughly equal the size of the economy within a decade, the budget office said. The last time the debt burden hit that level was just after World War II."

so, in a decade it will be where it was right before the US economy dominated the world

yeah, I guess a foreign troll from Canada can't be happy about that!

"The biggest problem in the coming decade stems from last year’s tax cut. It is estimated to increase the deficit by more than $2.3 trillion over the decade."

that's a matter of opinion

I think the problem is that the government is way too big

June 28, 2018 4:59 PM  
Anonymous Be careful what you wish for yourself said...

Donald J. Trump✔
@realDonaldTrump

The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?

June 28, 2018 5:37 PM  
Anonymous Pollster Pete said...

let's have a vote for who's responsible for the Dems' worst nightmare becoming real:

1. Harry Reid for abolishing the filibuster to pack appellate courts with judges who would rubber stamp the nutty schemes of Obama the Worst

2. Chuck Schumer who filibustered Neil Goresuch, someone who didn't change the balance of the court, giving the GOP an excuse to eliminate the tradition of 60 votes needed to approve a SCOTUS justice

3. The idiotic Dems who contributed to and nominated Hillary

Voting will be open for 24 hours. A winner will be announced tomorrow.

June 29, 2018 7:21 AM  
Anonymous Roy Rojers said...

Happy Trails!

I reckon my vote would be goin' to the cowpokes that voted for the little lady

June 29, 2018 7:48 AM  
Anonymous jack brown said...

I'm voting for, and heartily thank, the Hillary people

I got my toes in the water, ass in the sand
Not a worry in the world, a cold beer in my hand
Life is good today,
life is good today

June 29, 2018 7:59 AM  
Anonymous kanye best said...

yo!

'sup, beautiful people

I'm down with blaming Hillary pushers

June 29, 2018 8:02 AM  
Anonymous Get Ready For A White House Run By Fox News said...

Bill Shine, the former co-president of Fox News, has accepted a top job in the White House communications department, several major news outlets have reported. This is the same Shine forced out at Fox News earlier this year because he allowed a culture of sexual harassment and bullying to run rampant under its former chairman and CEO, Roger Ailes.

Under Shine, high-profile anchor Gretchen Carlson sued the network and subsequently settled for $20 million in damages, and Bill O’Reilly was forced to resign after it became public that the network had kept him on as its top draw after he paid about $32 million to settle sexual harassment allegations against a co-worker.

President Donald Trump’s decision to install Shine sends a clear message to women all across the country. It also deepens the symbiotic ― some might say incestuous ― relationship between this White House and the conservative media giant Shine used to run.

It’s hard to see this staffing decision as anything other than a slap in the face to American women. And it’s not like this is the first time this White House hired a staffer with a track record of mistreating women: Trump famously defended his staff secretary, Rob Porter, after Porter was forced to resign amid allegations of spousal abuse. Hardly surprising, coming from a man who has himself been accused of sexual assault by more than 20 women.

Hiring Shine, who oversaw a network where sexual harassment ran rampant, makes it clear that Trump’s defense of Porter was not a one-off: He is eager to surround himself with men who demean and harm women, and all too willing to hand those men even more power...

The close relationship between Fox News and the president should send a shiver down the spine of anyone who understands the power and reach of the network’s messaging. It has become entirely too common to hear Sean Hannity or Fox & Friends repeat verbatim the attacks and conspiracy theories laid out by the president. Likewise, it is all too common to hear Trump himself parroting the language you’ll hear on Fox News shows.

Jokes about state-run media sound a lot less like jokes these days: According to aides in the White House, Hannity is Trump’s the de-facto chief of staff.

And let's not forget:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/07/21/a-rigorous-scientific-look-into-the-fox-news-effect/#5e0d914c12ab

http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

https://www.wisconsingazette.com/news/study-fox-news-viewers-less-informed-than-people-who-watch/article_9d180b14-e524-5b2c-86ea-e64176ce6993.html

June 29, 2018 8:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Take your meds, Sybil.

June 29, 2018 8:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Jokes about state-run media sound a lot less like jokes these days: According to aides in the White House, Hannity is Trump’s the de-facto chief of staff."

oh, it's very common for members of the media to have a close relationship with government figures

did you see the recent movie about the Washington Post?

it only bothers you because FOX doesn't propagandize for progressive causes like the mainstream media does

they've threatened the left's control of the media

as for "state-run media", it's called PBS and NPR, and generally supports the deep state

that's fine as long as other outlets flourish

Obama the Worst made regular attacks on the media, but we survived

June 29, 2018 8:57 AM  
Anonymous it's morning in America's Supreme Court said...

"Take your meds, Sybil."

I got my toes in the water, ass in the sand
Not a worry in the world, a cold beer in my hand
Life is good today,
life is good today

June 29, 2018 8:59 AM  
Anonymous How soon and how repeatedly they forget said...

"Obama...doubled the debt of all other Presidents"

Thanks to the Bush's Great Recession. In September 2008, two months before Obama was elected Lehman Brothers - the 158-year-old Wall Street giant - filed for bankruptcy protection as the US economy continued its GOP led free fall.

See Bikini Graph

"anyway, debt doesn't generally cause a crisis in the short run"

As long as a Democratic President is elected to clean up after the GOP President gives huge tax cuts to his cronies and spends like a rich white guy.

"cutting spending is much better

Trump is brimming with ideas to do that"

IQ45 is brimming with ideas to increase spending.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/13/trump-budget-spending-increases/330337002/

June 29, 2018 9:05 AM  
Anonymous a little humor for a summertime Friday said...

’ll get straight to the point -- I’m emailing for $1.

Why? Because President Trump is a disgrace.

He lies daily.

He shows no empathy towards our immigrant brothers and sisters. He is locking children in cages.

His closest allies and staff are under FBI investigation.

He’s even befriended dictators and shut out our allies!

If President Obama had done anything like this, Republicans would have eaten him alive.

It makes me furious. We desperately need to elect a Democratic House that will hold President Trump to a much higher standard.

I’m personally calling on 2O,OOO grassroots Democrats to pitch in and fight back before the Mid-Year Deadline. This is our biggest deadline to date.

Will you join me and rush in $1 right away?

ALL GIFTS TRIPLE-MATCHED

Triple match your $1 >>

Thanks,

Barbra Streisand

June 29, 2018 9:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Nazi analogy has long been recognized as the crudest and dumbest form of argument, but it’s enjoying a renaissance.

Former CIA Director Michael Hayden notoriously and unapologetically tweeted a photo of Auschwitz-Birkenau as a response to family separations at the border. Upon a report that parents at the border were being told that their children were being taken to get bathed and disappearing, Chris Hayes of MSNBC tweeted, “What does this remind you of?” Soledad O’Brien chimed in, “Welp, I guess we’ve put to rest the question: ‘Nazi Germany: Could it happen here in America?’ ”

Progressives imagine that they are protecting our system when making these and related charges, but they are really losing faith in it themselves and undermining its legitimacy.

Kumail Nanjiani, a comedian and actor with more than 2 million followers on Twitter, objected to President Trump’s contention that illegal immigration brings criminals into the United States. He said Hitler “focused on crimes by Jews,” and this is what brought on Nazi Germany over time.

Actually, Hitler was named chancellor in January 1933 and immediately acted to curtail press and individual rights and begin repressing the Jews. He used the Reichstag fire to mobilize against opponents, including through violence, and gained full dictatorial powers via the Enabling Act in March 1933.

By comparison, Trump in his first year and a half in office has tweeted, called the press names and — yes — highlighted crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Unpresidential? Yes. Disturbing? At times. Fascistic? No.

Several books, including one by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, are devoted to more sophisticated versions of the Trump-as-budding-fascist theme.

In “How Democracies Die,” Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt write that “Trump’s first year in office followed a familiar script. Like Alberto Fujimori, Hugo Chavez and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, America’s new president began his tenure by launching blistering rhetorical attacks on his opponents.”

Well, yeah, and these comparisons would be fair and apt if Trump went on to purge and jail his opponents.

Levitsky and Ziblatt believe the best scenario for democracy is that Trump loses. A much darker future is that “a pro-Trump GOP would retain the presidency, both houses of Congress, and the vast majority of statehouses, and it would eventually gain a solid majority in the Supreme Court.”

To do all this, Republicans would have . . . to win elections, an odd thing for an anti-democratic party to do.

Yes, authoritarians overseas win elections — by rigging them and disqualifying opponents.

June 29, 2018 9:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

After continuing to win sweeping electoral mandates, per Levitsky and Ziblatt, Republicans would then enshrine their rule by “using the techniques of constitutional hardball to manufacture durable white electoral majorities.”

They’d do this through large-scale deportations (never mind that illegal immigrants don’t vote); immigration restriction (which would require Congress passing laws and would presumably change the foreign-born percentage of the electorate only slowly over time); purges of the voter rolls (if the Ohio example recently upheld by the Supreme Court is any indication, this would involve the removal of nonvoters who didn’t reply to a notice over a period of years) and strict voter ID laws (i.e., requiring a valid ID).

You can object to every single one of these measures and still realize that they hardly amount to the agenda of Erdogan or Fujimori.

The worries about Trump as fascist dovetail with critiques of our system itself as undemocratic. These will become more prominent as Trump moves to almost certainly nominate another robustly constitutionalist, highly credentialed jurist to the highest court in the land.

For progressives like Jonathan Chait of New York magazine and Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times, this is another sign of “minority rule.”

But Republicans get to nominate and confirm Supreme Court justices because they won the presidency and retained control of the Senate in 2016 in a hard-fought national election.

It is true that Trump won despite losing the popular vote, but the Electoral College is nothing new or untoward. It can’t be that Democrats, thought not long ago to have a lock on the presidency, suddenly can’t possibly muster 270 electoral votes. Have Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania gone from blue wall to unwinnable that quickly? And the Senate, held by Democrats as recently as 2014, become an insuperable electoral obstacle?

Our system will presumably look much better to progressives if Democrats go out and win some elections. You know, like the alleged fascists do.

June 29, 2018 9:49 AM  
Anonymous Dems can't be happy said...

President Trump is expected to move quickly to nominate a replacement for retiring Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s soon-to-be-vacant Supreme Court seat, and the leading candidate is veteran Washington, D.C., appellate Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

He emerged from a list of more than two dozen potential nominees put together by the conservative Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation.

The list was Trump’s idea and it has proven another brilliant and effective triumph. It told Republican voters that he was serious about appointing only reliable conservatives to the high court.

Unlike in decades past, when presidents and their top lawyers scrambled to find a qualified nominee when a vacancy suddenly arose, the Federalist Society list is the result of careful screening. A team of lawyers read and analyzed everything written or said by the candidates.

Their unofficial motto is “No more Souters,” a reference to now-retired Justice David H. Souter, who was nominated by President George H.W. Bush in 1990. Souter was a little-known judge from New Hampshire, but the White House team assured Republicans he was a conservative.

They were wrong. Souter was careful and cautious as a judge and devoted to precedent. But his leanings were moderate to liberal. In 1992, Souter along with Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Sandra Day O’Connor joined to uphold the right to abortion announced two decades earlier in Roe vs. Wade.

Conservatives are determined never to make sure that never happens again.

Kavanaugh, 53, grew up in Washington and is the favorite of many conservative lawyers here. He went to Yale Law School and clerked at the Supreme Court for Kennedy alongside Neil M. Gorsuch, who joined the court last year as Trump’s first appointment.

Kavanaugh drafted the Starr Report that led to CLINTON'S IMPEACHMENT.

He also joined the legal team that represented George W. Bush in the fight over the RECOUNT IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

In 2003, Bush nominated him to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, but DEMOCRATS INITIALLY BLOCKED his confirmation. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) called him a “very bright legal foot soldier” who has been in the middle of every partisan legal battle.

Kavanaugh supports the right to own a semiautomatic rifle under the 2nd Amendment.

June 29, 2018 10:17 AM  
Anonymous Still drippin' said...

BRISTOL, England — On Aug. 19, 2016, Arron Banks, a wealthy British businessman, sat down at the palatial residence of the Russian ambassador to London for a lunch of wild halibut and Belevskaya pastila apple sweets accompanied by Russian white wine.

Banks had just scored a huge win. From relative obscurity, he had become the largest political donor in British history by pouring millions into Brexit, the campaign to disentangle the United Kingdom from the European Union that had earned a jaw-dropping victory at the polls two months earlier.

Now he had something else that bolstered his standing as he sat down with his new Russian friend, Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko: his team’s deepening ties to Donald Trump’s insurgent presidential bid in the United States. A major Brexit supporter, Stephen K. Bannon, had just been installed as chief executive of Trump’s campaign. And Banks and his fellow Brexiteers had been invited to attend a fundraiser with Trump in Mississippi.

Less than a week after the meeting with the Russian envoy, Banks and firebrand Brexit politician Nigel Farage — by then a cult hero among some anti-establishment Trump supporters — were huddling privately with the Republican nominee in Jackson, Miss., where Farage wowed a foot-stomping crowd at a Trump rally.

Banks’s journey from a lavish meal with a Russian diplomat in London to the raucous heart of Trump country was part of an unusual intercontinental charm offensive by the wealthy British donor and his associates, a hard-partying lot who dubbed themselves the “Bad Boys of Brexit.” Their efforts to simultaneously cultivate ties to Russian officials and Trump’s campaign have captured the interest of investigators in the United Kingdom and the United States, including special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.

Both inquiries center on questions of Russia’s involvement in seismic political events that have shaken the world order, with the European Union losing a key member and U.S. voters electing a president critical of Washington’s traditional alliances.

In Britain, recent revelations about Banks’s Russian contacts have triggered scrutiny of whether the Russians sought to bolster the Brexit effort. In the U.S., congressional Democrats who recently obtained a trove of Banks’s communications have begun exploring a different question: Did the Brexit leaders serve as a conduit between the Kremlin and Trump’s operation?...

In recent weeks, British parliamentary investigators have sought information about Banks’s relationship to Russia and allegations that he was offered financial inducements, including a potentially lucrative gold-mine deal with a Russian businessman he met through the Russian ambassador.

The interactions between the Brexit leaders and the Trump campaign have also drawn the interest of Mueller as part of his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign, which is examining contacts between Trump associates and Russians.

Two people — former Trump communications official Michael Caputo and another person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation — told The Post that Mueller’s investigators asked about Farage’s relationship to Trump associates in witness interviews this year, including Caputo just last month.

A spokesman for the special counsel declined to comment.

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats are examining the role of the Brexit leaders after a whistleblower gave a cache of documents detailing Banks’s interactions with the Russian ambassador to members of the House Intelligence Committee earlier this month, according to three lawmakers on the panel....

Is Kavanaugh pro-Putin too?

June 29, 2018 11:48 AM  
Anonymous c'est la vie, gay agenda said...

"Is Kavanaugh pro-Putin too?"

Really don't know.

He went to Georgetown Prep. Does anyone here know him from school?

A dumb TTFer wants to know if he likes Vladimir Putin.

I do know he likes the Constitution.

Our Supreme Court will soon be dominated by originalists. Here's some of what that means:

1. when the sexual revolution collides with the First Amendment, expect to see the First Amendment win. A more solidly originalist court would likely have decided Masterpiece Cakeshop on broader free-expression grounds, would scoff at the very notion that the government could revoke religious institutions’ tax exemptions for upholding their own notions of sexual morality, and take a dim view of efforts to prohibit counselors or pastors from sharing such notions with gay or transgender clients.

2. greater clarity on the Second Amendment. If an originalist court follows the late Antonin Scalia’s reasoning that the Second Amendment attaches to weapons “in common use for lawful purposes,” then broad “assault weapons” bans will likely fail.

3. interesting majorities protecting civil liberties from police abuse. With the increasing influence of originalism in conservative legal circles,and the increasing distrust of state power, the entire Bill of Rights has new life.

4. a more color-blind court. affirmative action has rested for a long time on magnifying the state interest in creating “diverse” communities through policies that explicitly use race as a factor to punish or privilege specific demographics. These policies exist far more as a matter of social justice and academic theory than actual constitutional law. Soon enough, the nation may understand that “equal protection” means just what it says.

5. greater skepticism toward the exercise of executive authority. In the absence of clear and express congressional delegations of power, there is growing originalist resistance to the voluntary judicial practice of deferring to agencies’ interpretations of federal law so long as they are merely “reasonable.”

6. American abortion law will change,

an originalist court stands for a simple proposition: The Founders created an ingenious system of government. We should give it another try.

June 29, 2018 12:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The Nazi analogy has long been recognized as the crudest and dumbest form of argument, but it’s enjoying a renaissance."

It is especially enjoying a renaissance on the right - or the "alt-right" as folks who like to show their racism without the requisite white hoods and robes these days.

Running around with torches at night and chanting "Jews will not replace us!" is an excellent way to invite comparisons to Nazis. Holding alt-right white rallies where people get run over by a car is another way - especially when you make false equivalencies claiming there were "very bad people on both sides."

Inviting Steve Bannon, editor in chief of the alt-right's biggest publication to join your cabinet is yet another way. Just because he was later asked to leave doesn't mean we forgot about him.

If you don't want to be compared to Nazis, STOP ACTING LIKE THEM, and STOP ENABLING THEM.

In Germany, Nazi sympathizers are banned from displaying swastikas. Do you know what they wave around instead?

Confederate flags.

The same ones waved by the proud, angry white voters that the Republican party loves to court.

June 29, 2018 12:23 PM  
Anonymous it's morning in America's Supreme Court said...

I got my toes in the water,

ass in the sand

Not a worry in the world,

a cold beer in my hand

Life is good today,

life is goooOOOoood this week!!

June 29, 2018 12:25 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

SCOTUS Strikes Down CA Requirements for Crisis Pregnancy Centers

The state of California has a law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” — that is, anti-abortion operations — to notify those who come in that they have a right to an abortion and that they are available with taxpayer funding in that state. Until yesterday, when the Supreme Court struck down that law on First Amendment “compelled speech” grounds.

The lineup was exactly what one would expect, the five conservatives in the majority and the four liberals in dissent. Justice Breyer wrote the dissent and pointed out the obvious inconsistency in the majority view, which is that the court has upheld requirements that clinics and doctors who perform abortions must inform patients about alternatives, but struck down this law, which does the same thing from the other side. And there’s an interesting history here.

The Supreme Court twice struck down laws requiring abortion clinics and doctors to inform patients about adoption services, requiring them to tell patients that life begins at conception, and other things, on the same grounds they struck down this California law. But then in 1992’s Planned Parenthood v Casey ruling, written by Justice Kennedy — the case in which he initially voted to strike down Roe v Wade and was convinced to switch sides by Justices O’Connor and Souter — they upheld a Pennsylvania law requiring such disclosures, while still preserving the central finding of Roe.

And that ruling explicitly overturned the earlier two rulings. But now they’re suddenly going back to those previous rulings on compelled speech, but from the other direction — it’s apparently okay to require abortion clinics to inform people of legal alternatives to abortion, but not okay to require these fake pregnancy centers to inform people of their legal right to an abortion. Breyer writes in his dissent:

“If a State can lawfully require a doctor to tell a woman seeking an abortion about adoption services, why should it not be able, as here, to require a medical counselor to tell a woman seeking prenatal care or other reproductive healthcare about childbirth and abortion services? As the question suggests, there is no convincing reason to distinguish between information about adoption and information about abortion in this context.”

And he’s right. Both are entirely legal services. If it’s constitutional to compel speech in one direction, why isn’t it in the other direction? Apparently because the majority of the court just doesn’t like the message. Oh, sweet irony. The court engages in content discrimination in the name of opposing content discrimination.

June 29, 2018 12:40 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Ivanka Trump who claims she's pro-LGBT donated $50,000 to a viciously anti-gay church

The money is ostensibly to support alleged efforts to help immigrant children but based on this churches history none of the money will go to that purpose and any that doesn't go into the pockets of the people running the church will got to oppressing LGBT people.

Before the election Republicans trying to court the vote of the LGBT community falsely claimed she'd restrain her father's anti-gay impulses. Instead Trump has become the most anti-gay president in American history. And Ivanka is no better.

June 29, 2018 12:41 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous said "life is goooOOOoood this week!!".

Nothing that has happened this week has made your life any better, its only made other people's lives worse. That's what makes you happy, damage to others. Because you're evil.

June 29, 2018 12:44 PM  
Anonymous TTFers are psycho-loons said...

"It is especially enjoying a renaissance on the right"

eh, not really

the media is doing their best but no one's biting

"Running around with torches at night and chanting "Jews will not replace us!" is an excellent way to invite comparisons to Nazis. Holding alt-right white rallies where people get run over by a car is another way - especially when you make false equivalencies claiming there were "very bad people on both sides.""

there was an incident in Charlottesville where more people than you would expect showed up because the neo-Nazis disguised who they were and made it look like a rally to preserve Confederate monuments

"Inviting Steve Bannon, editor in chief of the alt-right's biggest publication to join your cabinet is yet another way. Just because he was later asked to leave doesn't mean we forgot about him."

give us an example of why you think you can demonize this guy

be specific and drop the favorite liberal agenda tactic: demonization by generalization

"If you don't want to be compared to Nazis, STOP ACTING LIKE THEM,"

the only ones acting like them are them and they're are a tiny fringe group that Dems would dearly like to become bigger

"and STOP ENABLING THEM."

like how?

"In Germany, Nazi sympathizers are banned from displaying swastikas."

ironic that the land of Nazism would ban free speech

"Do you know what they wave around instead?

Confederate flags."

really? give us some stats on that

did it happen more than once?

did it even happen once?

"The same ones waved by the proud, angry white voters that the Republican party loves to court."

that sounds like inner city Dem politicians who love to court Louis Farrakan and his anti-semitic goons

Farrakan's followers vastly outnumber the psycho-loons that join neo-nazi groups

June 29, 2018 12:49 PM  
Anonymous your humble servant said...

The state of California has a law requiring anti-abortion groups to notify those who come in that they have a right to an abortion and that they are available with taxpayer funding

this week, the Supreme Court struck down that law on First Amendment grounds.

"The lineup was exactly what one would expect,"

wait til you see the line-up that's coming

soon, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer will be gone too

they have been staying beyond their to protect the liberal agenda but it's become clear that's pointless

those laws banning reparative therapy?

they're toast

I got my toes in the water,

ass in the sand

Not a worry in the world,

a cold beer in my hand

Life is good today,

life is goooOOOoood this week!!

June 29, 2018 12:56 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

In 2012 the owner of Get It Cookie ship in Virginia refused to serve Joe Biden, citing political differences. This pleased Republicans so much that they placed hundreds of cookie orders from across the States and Paul Ryan even invited him to be introduced at a campaign rally. So spare us your fake outrage about Huckabee-Sanders and the Red Hen!

June 29, 2018 1:01 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Dan Rather
6 hrs ·
President Trump and the GOP bemoaning a lack of civility is a hypocritical farce. It spurs an almost uncontrollable bout of forehead slapping in disbelief.

But let's be clear about what incivility really looks like:

Incivility is lying to impugn the citizenship of the first African American president.

Incivility is threatening and mocking reporters and attacking the First Amendment protections of our free and independent press.

Incivility is destroying the environment and ignoring climate change.

Incivility is countenancing corruption and venality in the highest reaches of the White House and its cabinet.

Incivility is our government's response to Puerto Rico.

Incivility is undermining a merited investigation by respected law enforcement officials and maligning the notion of an independent judiciary.

Incivility is cozying up to dictators and attacking our allies and friends.

Incivility is ripping children - even those too young to know their parent's name - from immigrants legally claiming asylum.

Incivility is endeavoring to have millions of Americans lose their health insurance.

Incivility is creating a false equivalence between Nazis and counter protesters.

Incivility is using peaceful dissent from NFL players as a pretense for stirring the deep waters of racial injustice.

Incivility is using Twitter to lie and bully.

Incivility is just having the pathology to constantly lie in the first place.

Incivility is gas lighting your fellow citizens on issues big and small.

Incivility is trying to bar entry to the United States on account of religion.

Incivility is ignoring science and reason.

Incivility is trying to run roughshod over our constitutional protections.

These are but a few of the real incivilities that plague our moment in history. They are the actions of a man and his enablers who feel no compunction about destroying the bonds that have held this improbable nation together. We will only succeed if we have a civil society. And anything or anyone who attacks that cherished American ideal must be considered... uncivil.

June 29, 2018 1:02 PM  
Anonymous i see the smithereens of the liberal agenda said...

did I have any fake outrage about that?

I favor the Red Hen having a legal right to refuse to serve anyone they want

btw, the press has been trying to portray this as a protest against border policies but the employees who egged the owner on to throw out Huckabee were gays who opposed Trump's transgender policies

why has that been covered up?

this is gays discriminating against someone else!!

those hypocritical bastards!

anyway, while I think it should be legal, liberals will regret going down this road, just like they now regret eliminating the filibuster

two can play that little game

here's ballad I wrote for this weekend

(sung to the tune of Alice Cooper's "School's Out"):

liberals got no class

and they got no principles

and they got no intelligence

liberal court's out for summer

liberal court's out forever

liberal court's been blown to...

PIECES!!!

June 29, 2018 1:15 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

When it comes to protecting your freedom a free press does a hell of a lot more than an AR-15 collection.

So, of course Trump and the Republicans are waging an all out assault on the free press, calling them the "enemy of the people". No wonder the unhinged are killing journalists.

The American public overwhelmingly supports the right to choose, marriage equality, sensible gun control like unavoidable background checks, etc. - the American public is far more liberal than conservative.

Trump does not have the moral or democratic right to appoint unqualified extremist right wing judges who ignore the law to rule in favour of extreme conservative policies the American public overwhelmingly opposes.

Trump was right about one thing - "the electoral college is a disaster for democracy!"

The United States is turning into "The Handmaid's Tale".

June 29, 2018 1:21 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

NBC News:

"Can you please talk to us about the dead reporters in Annapolis?

"Do you have any words of condolence for the families, M. President?"

"Why are you walking away?"

Pres. Trump does not comment when asked about the deadly Maryland newsroom shooting.

June 29, 2018 1:27 PM  
Anonymous toes on the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good said...

I didn't say anything either

what did you say, Priya the Foreign Trollbot?

June 29, 2018 1:32 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Let's all say it together: "The President of the United States is the subject of two criminal investigations."

June 29, 2018 1:46 PM  
Anonymous Welcome to Trumplandia said...

Of course IQ45 had nothing to say about the white shooter or his white victims who were members of the press.

Rather than loving our freedom of press enshrined in the US Constitution, tRump refers to media as the "enemy of the American people."


June 29, 2018 1:46 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Southern Republicans: You've been voting for the Republicans for fifty years, and you're still the poorest part of the country. The problem isn't immigrants, or environmental regulations, or the media, or socialism, or Sharia Law, or people saying "Happy Holidays!". The problem is that you keep voting for people who care more about giving tax breaks to corporations and billionaires than about helping you obtain the basic necessities of life.

Another day, more Republican dirty tricks

June 29, 2018 1:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Mom, tell me about 2016"

Well honey, people were upset about a woman's emails so we let the Nazis take over.

June 29, 2018 1:52 PM  
Anonymous toes on the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good said...

"When it comes to protecting your freedom a free press does a hell of a lot more than an AR-15 collection"

it's not an either-or situation

the Constitution provides for both free press and a right to bear arms

"So, of course Trump and the Republicans are waging an all out assault on the free press, calling them the "enemy of the people"."

typical postmodernist thinking

criticizing is "waging an all out assault"

unfortunately for the people who push this moronic formulation, such as foreign trolls. all Presidents have complained about the press, including Obama the Worst, who actually prosecuted journalists

"No wonder the unhinged are killing journalists."

when else has this happened?

other than the cartoonist in Europe who was killed by Muslims, I don't recall anything like this

the press had a negative approval rating, and I mean real negative, for years before Trump came on the scene

"The American public overwhelmingly supports the right to choose, marriage equality, sensible gun control like unavoidable background checks, etc. - the American public is far more liberal than conservative."

yeah, right

until they vote

funny how that works

"Trump does not have the moral or democratic right to appoint"

actually, he has the Constitutional right to nominate anyone he wants

"unqualified"

you'd be hard pressed to find anyone more qualified than Goresuch and Kavanaugh

they both clerked for Kennedy and went on to judicial appointments

"extremist right wing "

originalism is an antidote to partisanship

"judges who ignore the law"

the Constitution is the law

"to rule in favour of extreme conservative policies the American public overwhelmingly opposes."

judges don't have constituents

that's the point

June 29, 2018 2:06 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

What's the difference between a Nazi and a trump supporter?

No, really, what's the difference?

June 29, 2018 2:09 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

You will never successfully ban abortion. Abortion has existed as long as pregnancy has. You will only successfully ban safe abortion, and directly lead to the death of people who do not want to be pregnant.

But of course Republicans are perfectly happy with that. Republicans aren't "pro-life", they're "pro-punish-women-for-having-sex-for-fun".
---------------------------------------
Trump taking credit for Obama's economy is like someone inheriting millions from his dad and bragging about what a smart business man he is.

June 29, 2018 2:10 PM  
Anonymous toes on the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good said...

"The President of the United States is the subject of two criminal investigations."

Priya the Foreign Troll has lied again.

Show us one person who says he is investigating the President of the United States

we'll keep track of the time you spend trying to make something up

inner city blacks:

You've been voting for the Democrats for fifty years, and you're still the poorest part of the country

June 29, 2018 2:12 PM  
Anonymous toes on the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good said...

"Trump taking credit for Obama's economy"

Priya the Foreign Troll claims to think Obama the Worst is responsible for how great the economy is

I guess the only way to settle it is to vote on it

we'll call it November

June 29, 2018 2:16 PM  
Anonymous Inartful dealer said...

WISCONSIN
Harley-Davidson said on Monday it would shift some production of its bikes overseas to avoid stiff retaliatory tariffs imposed by the European Union in response to Mr. Trump’s trade measures. The company said the move “is not the company’s preference, but represents the only sustainable option to make its motorcycles accessible to customers in the E.U. and maintain a viable business in Europe.”

MISSOURI
MidContinent Steel and Wire is the largest nail manufacturer in the U.S. and employs hundreds of people in Poplar Bluff. It is owned by Deacaro, a Mexico-headquartered firm which ships steel from its mills in Mexico into the U.S. for a variety of finished products. The administration’s steel tariffs add a 25 percent penalty to the raw material. “The imposition of these tariffs on our raw materials on June 1st has actually put our operations into a crisis mode,” operations general manager Chris Pratt told KFVS in an interview. One employee laid off last Monday said the layoffs could be a sign of bigger problems at the nail factory, KFVS reported.

SOUTH CAROLINA
The nonpartisan Tax Foundation undertook a study in March to sort out what impact steel and aluminum tariffs would have on the economies of individual U.S. states. According to the foundation, South Carolina businesses imported nearly $550 million worth of aluminum and steel last year. With the tariffs, the cost on those metals would increase by $106.7 million.

FLORIDA
Canada is Florida’s most important economic partner. Each year we trade more than $8 billion in goods and services. We have almost 3.5 million Canadians visiting the state each year, spending more than $6.5 billion. We own more than $55 billion in residential housing. Between both those activities, Canadians contribute over $1.2 billion in taxes that go to local schools, hospitals, roads, etc. We have almost 500 Canadian companies that provide over $1.7 billion in salary each year. In 2017, trade and investment with Canada supported 620,200 Floridian jobs.

IOWA
Farmers are poised to lose hundreds of millions due to China placing a retaliatory tariff on soybeans, which Iowa produced and shipped a whopping $14 billion of last year. The Des Moines Register reports, “Iowa farmers could lose up to $624 million, depending on how long the tariffs are in place and the speed producers can find new markets for their soybeans, said Chad Hart, an Iowa State University economist.”

June 29, 2018 2:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

so far, unemployment rates are great

also, these corporations just received huge tax breaks so they should be able to withstand some price increases in the short-term

in the long-term, they can deal with American companies until China agrees to stop cheating

June 29, 2018 2:27 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Justin: "Journalists tell the stories of our communities, protect democracy, and often put their lives on the line just to do their jobs. Today's attack in Annapolis is devastating. Our hearts go out to all the victims and their families."


You will be told in the coming days that [today's shooter] was a lone wolf with a beef against one newspaper, but you must remember this (tweet):

“Referring to @realDonaldTrump as ‘unqualified,’” he tweeted at the newspaper in 2015, “@capgaznews could end badly (again).”

(h/t Daily Beast)

June 29, 2018 2:42 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Russel Walker, A Republican State House candidate in North Carolina. He said "God is a racist and a white supremacist," that Jews "all descend from Sataon" and that Martin Luther King" was an agent of Sataon." He WON the Republican primary with 65% of the votes. USA, you have a serious problem that a wall won't fix.

June 29, 2018 2:42 PM  
Anonymous what about Dana? said...

Jeff Waldstreicher sent me a personal email where he strongly denounced Dana Beyer's Trump-like tactics:

"This is the portion of the email where protocol and magnanimity usually reign. I believe in the power of both, but these are challenging and historic times, so I hope you'll excuse a small dose of candor: The Democratic Party is the oldest political party on the face of the earth, and for a half-century it's been home to those like me who believe in racial equality, feminism, economic justice, and the power of public education. When Democrats choose to attack other Democrats, the perpetrators do grave damage to the party we love. And when Democrats use the tactics of Republicans to do so--embracing negativity, utilizing false and misleading information--the perpetrators give cover to those who are actively seeking to undo our basic democratic norms.

Our victory on Tuesday was a clear rejection of the politics of personal destruction, and instead an embrace of an optimistic and progressive vision in which we stand stronger together. Nonetheless, our work is not done. In the Senate, you have my word that I'll strive each and every day to model civility, collegiality, and an acute belief in the rules of fair play. It's important to me that we do so in order to restore trust in government. But it's even more important to me as a father of three. I want Kate, Eli, & Harry to grow up knowing that government can be a force for good--and that their dad played a role in reinforcing that principle.

My sincerest gratitude for your friendship and support. In January, they will begin calling me Senator. In humble service, I hope that'll you'll continue calling me...

Jeff

June 29, 2018 2:53 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The floundering fathers made no provisions in the American constitution for a president under criminal investigation to elect his own judge. Trump is under, not one, but two criminal investigations and must be restrained until when and if he's cleared by Mueller.

June 29, 2018 3:00 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump Wants US To Leave World Trade Organization

June 29, 2018 Idiocracy, Politics

Axios reports:

President Trump has repeatedly told top White House officials he wants to withdraw the United States from the World Trade Organization, a move that would throw global trade into wild disarray, people involved in the talks tell Axios.

What we’re hearing: “He’s [threatened to withdraw] 100 times. It would totally [screw] us as a country,” said a source who’s discussed the subject with Trump. The source added that Trump has frequently told advisers, “We always get fucked by them [the WTO]. I don’t know why we’re in it. The WTO is designed by the rest of the world to screw the United States.”

A U.S. withdrawal from the WTO would send global markets into a spiral and cast trillions of dollars of trade into doubt. It would also blow up an institution that for 70-plus years has been a pillar of global economic and political stability.

From Wikipedia:

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an intergovernmental organization that regulates international trade. The WTO officially commenced on 1 January 1995 under the Marrakesh Agreement, signed by 124 nations on 15 April 1994, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which commenced in 1948. It is the largest international economic organization in the world.

The WTO deals with regulation of trade in goods, services and intellectual property between participating countries by providing a framework for negotiating trade agreements and a dispute resolution process aimed at enforcing participants’ adherence to WTO agreements, which are signed by representatives of member governments and ratified by their parliaments.

June 29, 2018 3:08 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

In Trump's Orwellian mind the States is screwed by the WTO when its required to treat other countries as its equals. He thinks what's "fair" is that the U.S. gets to screw other countries and they have to accept it. Note when Justin said "We won't be pushed around" and Trump blew his lid and said "You just can't do that!". Yep, in his fucked up mind if other countries don't take his abuse and unfair trade practices without resistance they're in the wrong. The U.S. has a surplus in goods and services with Canada - its the exact opposite of what lying Trump keeps saying.

June 29, 2018 3:09 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

So, crooked Donny is still whining bitterly about Harley Davidson moving jobs out of the U.S. to protect itself from the trade war he started.

Trump's trade war is having the exact opposite effect of what he claimed it would - "Trade wars are good and easy to win!" the blundering fool said when everyone told him the opposite was true.

You made this crooked Donny, you own this!

June 29, 2018 3:16 PM  
Anonymous toes on the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good said...

"The floundering fathers made no provisions in the American constitution for a president under criminal investigation to elect his own judge. Trump is under, not one, but two criminal investigations and must be restrained until when and if he's cleared by Mueller."

Trump is not under criminal investigation. Mueller, and Comey before made clear they understand that.

Priya doesn't understand our system of government because Priya is a foreign troll.

The Supreme Court doesn't hold criminal trials.

Further, because he runs the executive branch, of which the Justice Dept is a component and because, as Priya the Foreign Troll rightly notes, he appoints judges, and because he has unlimited pardon power, he can't, by definition, have a fair trial. Therefore, if evidence cames forth that he has committed a crime, the House of Representatives would vote whether the crime was serious enough to impeach him and the Senate would try him. There would be no penalty if found guilty but instead, the Senate would vote on whether the violation of law was serious enough to preclude him from performing his duties as President. If not, they would remove him.

June 29, 2018 3:17 PM  
Anonymous IQ45's contempt for the press is unAmerican said...

The Capital Gazette’s 2011 story about his conviction for criminally harassing a woman who had spurned him was accurate. There was no defamation, but an enraged Ramos kept up his abusive attacks on the woman — and the newspaper staff.

Trump seems to have pretty much the same attitude about news coverage that is true, though it may portray him in an unfavorable light.

If he does understand the role that journalists must play in a democracy — as public-spirited watchdogs, not sycophants like his friends at Fox News — he shows no indication of it.

And while the president frequently, and rightly, praises the “first responders” to a disaster, he fails to see that journalists, too, are first responders.

The small Capital Gazette staff bravely played that part on Thursday — tweeting the initial call for help, reporting immediately via social media from the scene, and managing to put out a print newspaper amid the trauma of a real-life nightmare.

The nation’s press was already under siege long before Thursday’s massacre. The number of ways seems almost infinite:

●Resources are shrinking. At Noelle Phillips’s paper in Denver, a once robust staff has been squeezed nearly to extinction by the hedge fund owners. And that is happening, to varying degrees, in nearly every community. It’s hard to be a watchdog when you’re starving to death.

●Legal threats are mounting. The Trump Justice Department, like Obama’s, has come after journalists as part of their crackdown on leaks. Just weeks ago, investigators seized the phone and email records of a New York Times reporter in a case that has alarmed First Amendment champions.

●Verbal abuse is rampant. At rally after rally, Trump has turned his amped-up crowds on journalists, encouraging insults or worse. Nastiness, and death threats, are the result.

●And Trump’s attitude has infected the entire culture, emboldening other public officials to trash press rights. It’s no wonder that America’s press-freedom ranking is sinking among the nations of the world in a recent Reporters Without Borders study.

Granted, journalists are far from perfect. We make mistakes, and often pay dearly for them in harm to our jobs or reputations. We can be unfair or show poor judgment. We certainly can be arrogant.

But we try to get it right, and usually do — as the Capital Gazette did with its accurate reporting on Ramos seven years ago, and as the national media does, day in and day out, in reporting on the Trump administration.

Trump can’t, and shouldn’t, be blamed for the Annapolis massacre.

But that doesn’t make his contempt for the press any less dangerous.

June 29, 2018 4:20 PM  
Anonymous Trump's tax troubles said...

"Trump is not under criminal investigation. Mueller, and Comey before made clear they understand that."

What's clear is the investigation will go where the evidence leads.

tRump really really really wants to build a gleaming tower in Moscow and he has for years.

tRump can claim his businesses are off limits, but if the evidence says otherwise, his businesses will be investigated.

Might explain he has so adamantly kept his tax returns hidden.

Trump breaks his tax returns promise — for the third year in a row

June 29, 2018 4:33 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

So, crooked Donny has been whining bitterly that the press hasn't praised him over his "agreement" with Kim Jong Un to "denuclearize".

The press has rightfully reported that the "agreement" is meaningless and Trump gave up ground in return for nothing.

North Korea is Rapidly Upgrading Nuclear Site Despite Summit Vow"

The so-called "greatest deal maker ever" got played again just like we all knew he would.

The popular vote losing pussy grabber isn't a legitimate president. The country overwhelmingly opposes his far right anti-gay agenda, he just managed to con a lot of people into voting for him with worthless promises.

June 29, 2018 4:38 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

The neverending corruption of the Trump Regime:

It turns out the retirement of Justice Kennedy was crooked. Justice Kennedy's son spent more than a decade at Deutshe Bank and lent over $1 billion to Trump when American banks stopped lending to him because he was a loser who never paid back his loans.

Trump is following in Putin's footsteps. American democracy is dead.

June 29, 2018 4:41 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

And no surprise that Deutsche Bank is as crooked as they come

They've been laundering billions in proceeds from Russian criminal organizations with links to Putin.

Gee, now who would have thunk crooked Donny would be associated with that bank??????

June 29, 2018 4:44 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

In which Glorious Leader woodenly reads somebody else’s words about how he doesn’t wish violence on his self-declared enemies.

Trump constantly demonizes the press and calls them "the enemy of the American people" because they (sometimes) hold him to account for his lies.

The don't come any more two-faced than the Mango Mussolini.

June 29, 2018 4:52 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Tump: "The press is the single greatest threat to the American people".

Oh yeah, he's a Nazi, all right.

Trump could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and Sean Hannity would blame Maxine Waters for it.

June 29, 2018 4:55 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

All the times Trump called for violence at his rallies

June 29, 2018 4:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"there was an incident in Charlottesville where more people than you would expect showed up because the neo-Nazis disguised who they were and made it look like a rally to preserve Confederate monuments"

The only way to possibly know this is if you personally knew the neo-nazis that were there - and how and when they like to use disguises.

Not that anyone is surprised that you personally know neo-nazis.

If you act like a neo-nazi, people are going to notice that - it's a pretty hard thing to "disguise."

Go ahead, put on a yamaka. I'm pretty sure people well be able to see who you really are underneath.

June 29, 2018 5:01 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Jim Acosta: "I tried to ask the president if he would stop calling us the enemy of the people. He did not respond."

June 29, 2018 5:52 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

BREAKING: The government has sent in riot police to break up the protests taking place outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in southwest Portland, which had shut the building down.

This is the USA right now. God forbid people protest against the kidnapping of children.

June 29, 2018 5:55 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous said "Trump is not under criminal investigation. Mueller, and Comey before made clear they understand that."

WRONG!

Mueller has informed Trump's legal team that he is the SUBJECT of the Trumpgate investigation. This means that while charges aren't imminent his role in a criminal activities is being looked at. As lawyers say, "one can go from the subject of an investigation to a target in a heartbeat".

The only reason Trump hasn't been declared a target of the Trumpgate investigation is that it is FBI policy that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime no matter how serious his wrongdoing and thus, for those technical reasons, cannot be the target of an investigation.

It is not a settled matter of law that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime, that is merely FBI policy and Mueller being a boy scout carries out his investigation with that supposition.

Trump most certainly IS under criminal investigation.

June 29, 2018 6:05 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

And Comey's telling Trump he "wasn't under investigation" was over a year ago - its totally irrelevant now that Trump is the subject of Mueller's Trumpgate investigation.

Just non-stop lying out of Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous.

But then what can you expect from people who say "there are many situations where its appropriate to lie"?

June 29, 2018 6:11 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Yet again, I'm constantly correcting Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous on the American political and Justice systems!

June 29, 2018 6:12 PM  
Anonymous Good ol' Family Values said...

It's like a broken record, but this time with Mormons...

A woman who filed a child sexual abuse lawsuit against her father is claiming that Mormon church leaders knew about the abuse for years but failed to report it to the police.

Kristy Johnson, 55, went public with her allegations against the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and her father, longtime church employee Melvin Kay Johnson, during a news conference in Salt Lake City on Thursday. She contends that the LDS church, while not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, was complicit in allowing her father’s abuse of her and her siblings to continue for years.

The Mormon church has a “culture” that protects sexual predators, Johnson said during the press conference.

“There is a very real, horrendous problem in the church right now,” she said. “That problem is that sexual predators are more protected in the Mormon church than innocent children and vulnerable adults.”

The civil lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Utah federal court, is directed against Melvin Kay Johnson, 81, who was for years employed with the Church Educational System, an organization within the LDS church tasked with providing religious and secular education to Mormons. He worked at an LDS seminary building in Ogden, Utah; as a religion professor at the church-run Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah; and at other Mormon educational institutions.

June 29, 2018 8:37 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Most fundamentalist christian religions cover up sexual abuse, preferring to blame the victims because they consider females inferior.

June 30, 2018 1:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Separated Children Forced to Recite Pledge of Allegiance


Consider my gast flabbered. At least some of the immigrant children who have been separated from their parents at the border are forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance — to a country that doesn’t want them, has split up their family and put their parents in jail.

IN BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, migrant children separated from their parents are required to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance, in English.

Why? “We tell them, ‘It’s out of respect,’ ” one employee of a facility holding these children told The Washington Post. Out of respect for what? A country that doesn’t want them, is breaking up their families, and is at growing odds with the loyalty pledge these kids are being forced to recite?

“. . . one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

What a sick, twisted joke this country has become, led by a sick, twisted man. I am so ashamed of my country right now. So damn ashamed.

June 30, 2018 12:55 PM  
Anonymous toes in the water, ass in the sand, not a worry in the world, cold beer in my hand, life is good this week, life is sooOOooo good!! said...

well, it's Saturday evening and another week has come to a close

but not any week

it's the week when the gay agenda went down in flames

a little drowsy from celebrating, will make a list of developments tomorrow

June 30, 2018 11:15 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Happy first of July everyone!

Remember, safety first with those fireworks!

July 01, 2018 2:12 AM  
Anonymous maybe things will be better next year............. said...

"Happy first of July everyone!

Remember, safety first with those fireworks!"

it's a very morose holiday for Canada this year

usually Baby Justin would be celebrating in Ottawa

instead, this year he has to skip the fireworks and travel around country consoling workers suffering from the trade war he started with his great neighbor to the South

that's what happens when you tangle with America!

July 01, 2018 6:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

it's a sad July First for Canada

very sad

July 01, 2018 7:25 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

greenmanTN • 2 hours ago

I read a book years ago called "Gender Wars" about the shit psychologists did to gender non-conforming kids in public schools, sometimes without their parents' knowledge or permission, and some of it would curl your hair. It was mostly about what they did to "sissy boys."

Here are some takeaways. They were sometimes successful at getting the little fairies to "man up."

Those kids, as demonstrated with psychological testing, showed higher levels of depression and anxiety than they did before "treatment."

They were less popular with their classmates (again, tested) than they were when they were their authentic selves.

Many became bullies, ruthlessly enforcing gender roles in others.

[That must be what happened to Wyatt & Regina - they hate LGBT who aren't suppressing who they are]

July 01, 2018 1:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To understand the madness gripping American leftists, try to see the world through their eyes. Presto, you’re now part of the raging resistance.

Like the Palestinians who mark Israel’s birth as their nakba, or tragedy, you regard Donald Trump’s 2016 victory as a catastrophe. It’s the last thing you think of most nights, and the first thing most mornings.

You can’t shake it or escape it. Whatever you watch, listen to or read, there are reminders — Donald Trump really is president.

You actually believe The New York Times is too nice to him, so you understand why a Manhattan woman urged a reporter there to stop covering Trump to protest his presidency.

And where the hell is Robert Mueller? He was supposed to save us from this nightmare — that’s what Chuck Schumer banked on. Well?

You spend your tax cut even as you rail against the man who made it happen. And you are pleased that cousin Jimmy finally got a job, though you repeat the daily devotional that Barack Obama deserves credit for the roaring economy.

And now this — Justice Anthony Kennedy is retiring, and Trump gets another Supreme Court pick. The court might tilt right for the rest of your life. He’s winning.

NOOOOOOOOO!!!

In a nutshell, our visit to the tortured mind of a Trump hater explains everything from Saturday’s mass marches to why a Virginia restaurant owner declared No Soup for Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Their loathing for Trump is bone-deep and all consuming. This is war and they take no prisoners.

For most marchers, border policies offer a chance to vent. They didn’t make a peep when Obama did the same thing.

If children are their main concern, they could help the 23,000 New York City kids living in shelters. Or they could have attended the funeral of Lesandro Guzman-Feliz, the innocent Bronx teen hacked to death by a Dominican gang.

Instead, they give in to Trump Derangement Syndrome, which causes them to immediately and absolutely adopt the opposite position of the president’s — facts and common sense be damned.

Alas, they may look back on the last few months as the good old days. For Trump, despite his stumbles and the Mueller shadow, is finding a political sweet spot.

July 01, 2018 1:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He is reaching a high-water mark in his presidency, with his support growing and expanding. Events, including big Supreme Court rulings and Kennedy’s retirement, give him chances to pad his advantage.

It’s a swift reversal from just 11 days ago, when Trump was sucking wind. The media was — again — treating him like a piñata over the separation of families on the border, and the White House was ready to fight a war it couldn’t win.

Then the president suddenly called off the dogs to sign an executive order ending family separations. Much of the hot air instantly came out of the resistance balloon, though protests continue because the left is embracing little or no border control as its passion of the moment.

Whether it’s because of Trump’s quick reversal and/or the left’s overreaction, polls are capturing the president’s rising fortunes. One survey showed most Americans were not nearly as sympathetic to the illegal border crossers as the media.

“I think it’s terrible about the kids getting split up from their parents. But the parents shouldn’t have been here,” a Minnesota woman told the Times.

Another poll shows Trump with 90 percent support among Republicans, matching the backing of President George W. Bush after 9/11.

And his support is broadening. A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll showed his approval rating hitting 47 percent, a two-point gain in one month driven by a 10-point swing among Hispanic voters and a four-point gain among Democrats.

Pollsters attributed the rise to the strong economy and that a whopping 75 percent approved of the president’s decision to meet with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.

Finally, a Pew finding about Trump supporters upends stereotypes: Just 31 percent are white men without college degrees, while 66 percent are college graduates, women or nonwhites.

July 01, 2018 1:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

These signs of the Big Mo switching sides came before two Supreme Court rulings that favored Trump. The first upheld his revised travel ban for a handful of Muslim-majority nations, saying it was within his ­executive authority.

It rebuked lower-court judges who bought the partisan canard that it was a “Muslim ban.” Their invalid rulings stood in stark contrast to plain readings of the law and show them to be hacks blowing with the political wind.

The second ruling, which blocks municipal unions from forcing workers to pay dues, is a tax cut for workers who opt out and a blow to Dems in New York, New Jersey and other blue states. The nexus between unions and Democrats turned those states into one-party fiefdoms — and resulted in union contracts taxpayers can’t afford.

Both rulings were 5-4, with Kennedy supplying the swing votes in an otherwise evenly divided court. That Trump will soon nominate his successor and likely have that person confirmed before the midterm elections improves GOP chances to hold Congress and the president’s chance to cement his legacy as an agent of dramatic change.

Because Democrats set the agenda for most media, the immediate talking point was that abortion rights are threatened with another GOP pick. While that is unlikely, given the Supremes’ traditional respect for precedent, the larger fact is that there is much more at stake than any single issue.

Consider that the travel-ban case upheld broad presidential authority on national security, and the union ruling was among several supporting First Amendment rights of individuals against government infringement.

Rulings like these have long-term cultural and political impacts and explain why Supreme Court appointments can have an outsized influence on a president’s legacy.

Already Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first pick, is enormously popular with those who believe a justice’s job is to make sure laws pass constitutional muster, not legislate from the bench. A second pick in the Gorsuch mold would secure a majority on the court for curbing government’s appetite for more domestic power, perhaps for decades.

And that could do something extraordinary for Trump’s legacy. All else being stable, putting the Supreme Court on an enduring constitutional footing would make his presidency one of the most consequential of any age.

Cue the wailing.

July 01, 2018 1:17 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

If the Next Supreme Court Bans Abortion, It Will Backfire on White Evangelicals

With Donald Trump poised to choose Anthony Kennedy‘s replacement on the Supreme Court, the obvious assumption is that he’ll pick someone from his Federalist Society-approved shortlist. That is to say, he’ll pick someone who’s extremely conservative and who will vote against abortion rights at every turn.

That is what white evangelicals want. That is why they’ve supported Trump no matter what. That is why they are practically arms of the GOP.

But if their wish comes true, and Trump appoints a second arch-conservative who successfully overturns Roe v. Wade (or some effective equivalent of that), white evangelicals should be aware that this will come back to bite them in the ass.

The most likely scenario, as some pundits have noted, is not that abortion would become illegal everywhere, all at once. It’s that some states would make it (all but) impossible to obtain one, some states would allow it, and many would restrict abortions as early as they possibly could.

What would happen then? Probably something similar to what we saw in Ireland, where abortions were banned for decades.

Women who can afford it would travel elsewhere to obtain an abortion while women who can’t would have to suffer. (That would especially affect women of color, a group that conservative evangelicals have already alienated.) Women would obtain abortifacients online, whether or not the pills are safe — and you can bet some of them won’t be safe. Women would try to perform their own abortions, and some would die. Women who can’t properly care for their children will have babies who may struggle in important areas of development, with effects society won’t see for decades. Some women who have abortions will end up in prison, as will some doctors.

In short, making abortions harder to obtain will disproportionately hurt women who are poor, young, single, and unable to get the care they need. That will lead to more health problems, more suicides, and more preventable deaths.

This is the future that evangelicals want, whether they believe it or not.

July 01, 2018 1:44 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

These are the same people who oppose comprehensive sex education, access to birth control, emergency contraception, and socialized medicine — the very things that we know decrease the number of abortions.

Don’t think evangelicals won’t be blamed for it either.

Over the past decade, we’ve seen young people — well, everyone, but especially young people — leave organized religion. There are many reasons for that, but one of the more obvious ones is that prominent religious groups fought against LGBTQ rights. They opposed same-sex marriage. They screwed up the easiest moral question of our time. And when young people had to choose between their religion and their LGBTQ friends, the answer for many was obvious. They left organized religion and never looked back.

Abortion is already showing signs of the same trend. The younger you are, the more likely you are to support legal abortion.

That Pew Research Center survey from 2017 found that 65% of people under 30 supported abortion rights in most/all cases compared to only 53% of those 65 or older.

When conservative churches are the ones fighting the hardest to ban abortion, young people who remain in those churches will see it, realize they want nothing to do with such a heartless and ignorant organization, and walk away. It’s already happened before; it will happen again.

We saw it in Ireland. In 1983, 67% of voters agreed abortion should be illegal, in large part due to the Catholic Church’s position. Since then, people have recognized the Church as the hotbed of illegal, immoral activity it’s always been, and Catholics had no moral ground to stand on during this year’s referendum. The ban was overturned by a 2:1 margin.

The Catholic Church in Ireland has also lost members as their immoral positions became clear to the public. Between 2011 and 2016, the percent of Catholics dropped by more than 3% (a huge drop in raw numbers considering how most Irish people are Catholic). At the same time, the percent of people without organized religion jumped 73.6%. You can bet the Church’s dogmatic opposition to abortion — even as women died as a result — played a large role in that.

So overturning Roe could very well lead to a quicker exodus out of conservative churches. Evangelicals may get their Supreme Court pick, but their reputation will be forever stained. As bad as it is now, and as much as people already understand that churches are no place to go to for moral guidance, it will only get worse.

In many ways, it’s similar to the Faustian bargain the Republican Party has already struck. Sure, the GOP has all the power now, but aligning with Trump and everything he does is pushing young people away from the party at a rate we’ve never seen before. Yet party leaders continue down the same path because they’re blinded by the short term gains.

Not that evangelicals care. They’ll push for an anti-abortion nominee from Trump and a quick confirmation by the Senate. And then, in time, when their churches are emptier than ever, they’ll point fingers at everyone but themselves.

July 01, 2018 1:45 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Yesterday tens of thousands turned out to protest the popular vote losing pussy grabber's policy of kidnapping children from immigrants.

Protests also took place in major Canadian cities. We wont' stand by silent while evil takes over the United States.

July 01, 2018 1:49 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Oh, look:

A man tried to assault a girl in a women's bathroom

And he didn't try to disguise himself as a woman.

So much for all the B.S. about there being a danger of predators pretending to be women to rape females in the women's bathroom.

Bigots like Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous are constantly demonizing transwomen and falsely claiming they are a danger to biological women if they are allowed to use the bathroom consistent with their gender identity:

In this thread at May 14, 2017 5:26 PM Wyatt/Regina/bad anonymous accused a transwoman he doesn't know of "can prey on young girls in the ladies' room as much as possible,"

And bigot Ruth Jacobs does the same:

"Government launched its own awareness campaign over transgender bathroom use: the “Not My Shower” initiative. Ruth Jacobs, the group’s president, says the campaign is meant to publicize the flip-side of transgender rights—privacy infringement for “normal people.”

“If somebody with an opposite body part is allowed in to a ladies’ restroom—a guy who has a penis, who could put his penis inside my vagina—what am I to do?” says Jacobs. “We need to be able to retain the right to speak up about men in our bathrooms without being labeled bigots.” "

If you don't want to be labeled a bigot then stop being a bigot, Ruth!


July 01, 2018 1:59 PM  
Anonymous Janus subverts all known principles of stare decisis. said...

"Supremes’ traditional respect for precedent" did not exist in the Janus decision barring unions from collecting fees from employees who benefit from their work.

"In Kagan’s fiery dissent, she blasted her colleagues for overturning a decades-old precedent, Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education, and thereby unleashing “large-scale consequences” for public sector unions....

Kagan argued that the decision to throw out Abood doesn’t pass muster:

But the worse part of today’s opinion is where the majority subverts all known principles of stare decisis. The majority makes plain, in the first 33 pages of its decision, that it believes Abood was wrong. But even if that were true (which it is not), it is not enough.

Kagan continued later in her dissent to discuss the real world consequences of the Court’s decision:

Over 20 States have by now enacted statutes authorizing fair-share provisions. To be precise, 22 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico—plus another two States for police and firefighter unions. Many of those States have multiple statutory provisions, with variations for different categories of public employees. See, e.g., Brief for State of California as Amicus Curiae 24–25. Every one of them will now need to come up with new ways— elaborated in new statutes—to structure relations between government employers and their workers. The majority responds, in a footnote no less, that this is of no proper concern to the Court.

She further noted the following:

Still more, thousands of current contracts covering millions of workers provide for agency fees. Usually, this Court recognizes that “[c]onsiderations in favor of stare decisis are at their acme in cases involving property and contract rights.” Payne, 501 U. S., at 828. Not today. The majority undoes bargains reached all over the country. It prevents the parties from fulfilling other commitments they have made based on those agreements. It forces the parties—immediately—to renegotiate once-settled terms and create new tradeoffs. It does so knowing that many of the parties will have to revise (or redo) multiple contracts simultaneously. (New York City, for example, has agreed to agency fees in 144 contracts with 97 public-sector unions. See Brief for New York City Municipal Labor Committee as Amicus Curiae 4.) It does so knowing that those renegotiations will occur in an environment of legal uncertainty, as state governments scramble to enact new labor legislation. See supra, at 23. It does so with no real clue of what will happen next—of how its action will alter public-sector labor relations. It does so even though the government services affected—policing, firefighting, teaching, transportation, sanitation (and more)—affect the quality of life of tens of millions of Americans. [emphasis added]

Laying out her case, Kagan bluntly wrote that the Court’s majority acted less on the law than a whim. The majority overruled Abood “for not exceptional or special reason, but because it never liked the decision.”

Kagan concluded that the majority’s decision amounts to turning “the First Amendment into a sword, and using it against workaday economic and regulatory policy.” This hasn’t been the first time the court’s majority has done so, Kagan wrote, adding as follows:

And it threatens not to be the last. Speech is everywhere—a part of every human activity (employment, health care, securities trading, you name it). For that reason, almost all economic and regulatory policy affects or touches speech. So the majority’s road runs long. And at every stop are black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices. The First Amendment was meant for better things. It was meant not to undermine but to protect democratic governance—including over the role of public-sector unions."

July 01, 2018 3:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Happy birthday Canada!

The only true progressive country in the Northern Hemisphere!

July 01, 2018 4:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Protests also took place in major Canadian cities. We wont' stand by silent while evil takes over the United States."

well, Canadians are obsessed with America for obvious reasons

"Bigots like good anonymous are constantly demonizing transwomen"

I don't think they're demons

I think they are mentally ill

"and falsely claiming they are a danger to biological women if they are allowed to use the bathroom consistent with their gender identity"

I've never said that

women don't want guys in the bathroom with them, even men that have a mental illness that prevents them from recognizing their own gender

women don't need an excuse for this

"In this thread at May 14, 2017 5:26 PM good anonymous accused a transwoman he doesn't know of "can prey on young girls in the ladies' room as much as possible,"

this is a lie

Priya the Foreign Troll uses the old troll trick of lying by concealing context

July 01, 2018 11:11 PM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

Trump is under not one, but two criminal investigations.

He cannot be allowed to pick a supreme court justice who may end up judging a case involving him.

July 02, 2018 1:49 AM  
Blogger Priya Lynn said...

With the exception of Bush in 2004, Republicans have lost the popular vote in 6 of the last 7 elections. By the end of this year, 4 of 9 Supreme Court Justices will have been appointed by presidents who got less votes than their opponent. Strange "democracy" indeed.

July 02, 2018 1:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home