Sunday, November 13, 2011

Sandusky's World

The Penn State scandal is unbelievable. It is a multidimensional nexus that highlights the worst of our society and some of the hardest things about being human.

At the core of it is one hardcore pedophile, Jerry Sandusky. He likes to molest prepubescent boys. He doesn't just like to molest boys, he is obsessed with it. He has arranged his entire life so that he is around young boys in situations that justify physical contact and nudity. He didn't only arrange his life, he arranged the entire society of the Penn State community and beyond to bring boys to him and to cover up for him. He set himself up as a hero, surrounded himself with heroic figures in the community, they made his excuses and kept the cops off his tail while the people of the university and the state -- students, faculty and staff, alumni, fans -- considered him a symbol of everything that is good.

One thing that blows you away with the Jerry Sandusky story is the extent to which he arranged to create a world around himself that aggrandized him while providing him access to victims. He established an organization for disadvantaged children and often took boys that he met through the organization to sporting events with him, set up a special bedroom for them in his home. He adopted six children. He lived next door to an elementary school and surrounded himself with children. As a Penn State coach he was venerated in the community; it seems crazy that there would be student riots protesting the arrest of a long-term child molester and the firing of the group of men who protected him, but the way Sandusky lived out his dark fantasy brought him widespread respect and admiration, people loved him and his ring of co-conspirators.

This blog formed in response to attacks on our suburban county's new sex ed curriculum seven years ago. In particular there were radical elements who wanted to exclude factual information about sexual orientation, and so we have a history here of reporting on and discussing LGBT issues. I am a straight blogger and do not pretend to speak for gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people. Our interest is in finding a way that we can all live happily together, accepting and even appreciating the differences between us.

That being said, I want to make a point very clear here. Jerry Sandusky is not gay. He is a straight man who has a sexual obsession with young boys. Gay people do not do what he did, he did not do what he did because he is secretly gay. He has sexual desires that are not all right to act on, and he acts on those desires in nonconsensual ways that are not all right. If a gay person molests a child they are prosecuted when they are caught, just like anybody, and that happens sometimes but it is not very common. This isn't about sexual orientation, it is about raping children.

If the focal story is about Jerry Sandusky the person and the creative ways he found to satisfy his bizarre cravings, the next-larger circle of the story has to do with the way the athletic department and university community allowed this to happen. At least two different adults walked in on Sandusky having sex with children and told their supervisors but did not call the police. One was a janitor, new to the job, he was freaked out after he saw Sandusky performing oral sex on a child -- he told his boss, who thought he was in danger of having a heart attack -- but he was afraid of losing his job if he involved the police. The other witness was a graduate assistant, now a coach, who walked into the shower room and saw Sandusky anally raping a child of approximately ten years of age, and left. Called his father. He later told his superiors on the coaching staff what he'd seen and there were meetings with the university president and others, they are trying to fudge the story but it doesn't matter, even if you thought a coach was "fondling" a kid that age you would report it to the police and get rid of him. Instead they circled the wagons and protected this monster.

The larger story has to do with the manipulation of public opinion.

Go to the Second Mile Foundation web site. This is the organization founded by Jerry Sandusky, they help children and when Sandusky saw one he liked he helped himself. The site opens with a Flash graphic that displays these words on the screen, one after the other:
  • Ongoing commitment
  • Responsibility
  • Volunteer driven
  • Opportunity
  • Character
  • Potential
  • Positive
  • Positive self-image
  • Positive contact
  • Positive interaction
  • The Second Mile; providing children with help and hope

This is the organization that Jerry Sandusky created to recruit children for sex.

There is an issue here, having to do with the appearance of morality. All the things in that list are good things. Children need opportunities, they need to develop a positive self-image. You cannot be against anything on that list. Help and hope are good, all these things are good.

It is like the liar who says "I am telling the truth." Truth-tellers also say "I am telling the truth," and because you don't know which kind of person you are dealing with, the statement is meaningless. The sentence "I am telling the truth" has no meaning, because a liar will say it as readily as someone who is truthful and there is no way to tell one from the other. You could take the statement at face value, you could say it means that the person speaking is telling the truth but you would be a fool.

In the same way, to say you are in favor of responsibility and positive interaction and giving children help and hope is meaningless. Everybody is in favor of giving children help and hope, attributing those motives to yourself does not mean you are more fervent about it than other people. In reality the best way to show you favor giving children help and hope is to actually give them help and hope. Do something for them, set an example, pave the way for a child with potential, be nice to a kid, there are lots of ways to help children. Sandusky set up an organization that advertised good motives, and sadly the people who actually work for the Second Mile Foundation seem to be good-hearted people who are trying to help children. But for Sandusky it was a front, a cover, a way for him to recruit boys for his own perverse use.

Of course it is not so simple, it doesn't make sense to automatically challenge people who say good things. It is necessary for people to articulate good principles. We need to remember sometimes, consciously, that it is important to help those who are disadvantaged, that we need to forgive those who have offended us, we need to say out loud that people who are different from us are people, too, just like us, and deserve our respect. There is really nothing wrong with saying good things. But it is not enough, and sadly it is possible to say good things and behave badly. And here's a hard concept: it is possible for good people to do bad things. Those who enabled Sandusky's immorality behaved badly, even though they were successful and even virtuous in other things. And sometimes there are bad people: Sandusky. Where do you draw the line and judge people rather than their actions? You can't punish an action, you punish the person, there is no way to distinguish a person from their behavior. Every judgment of a behavior is a judgment of the person who chose that behavior.

One last thing -- the Second Mile is a big organization and I am heartsick for those people who signed up and really did good things and have seen their good intentions misappropriated. The organization has a statement on their web site, by the way, explaining that they have not let Sandusky near the children since 2008. Jerry Sandusky's legacy will leave a bitter taste for many years to come.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

"That being said, I want to make a point very clear here. Jerry Sandusky is not gay. He is a straight man who has a sexual obsession with young boys."

this statement is ridiculous

whenever some scandal unfolds where some guy who is not a supporter of the gay agenda is involved in a same gender affair or incident, you jump to the conclusion he is gay

except here


only propaganda

redefining the English language is what gay advocates do best

but, at best, Sandusky is bi

the age is irrelevant to the fact he was attracted to his own gender

"Gay people do not do what he did,"

well, apparently, sometimes they do

"he did not do what he did because he is secretly gay."

probably not but that doesn't mean he's not gay

"This isn't about sexual orientation, it is about raping children."

that's true but it doesn't mean he wasn't gay

and while not all gays have done this, it doesn't change the mounting numbers of gays who have done this and that this happens at a much higher rate among same gender attracted people

just the facts, if we can speak the same language

November 13, 2011 10:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder what % of gays were sexual molested as a child?

November 13, 2011 11:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

it's high

November 14, 2011 12:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon, if you want to redefine homosexuality to include married, heterosexual pedophiles i guess you can do it. It wont help you understand actual gay people but it might make it easier for you to hate them, which is obviously the point.

November 14, 2011 12:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

homosexual: person who is sexually attracted to persons of his own gender

Sandusky: had a sexual attraction to kids of his own gender

November 14, 2011 6:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like I say, you can redefine the word homosexual to mean anything, if it make hating easier. Sandusky was attracted to children, there is no evidence at all that he had anything to do with adult males. His behavior with those boys has nothing to do with the behavior of actual gay people. The term for someone like him is "pedophile"

November 14, 2011 9:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

so what do you call gov McGreevey ?
Not gay because he was married ?
And why does staying married make a difference with Sandusky and not with McGreevey ?

If you are having sex with the same gender repeatedly, you are gay or a least bi....

Shall we go back to the MC curriculum definition ? didn't it say something about a repeated attraction to the same sex... I don't believe it mentioned the age ! (don't that as a recommendation to include pedophilia in the next rev of the course .... because I am sure that and bestiality are coming next).

November 14, 2011 11:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

mcgreevy had an affair with a man. He is gay. have you seen any indication anywhere that jerry sandusky had any sexual relationship at all with a man? no, there is none. Nobody has said he was gay, he is not gay. He has a perverted desire for children, boys in particular, and acts on those desires. He is a pedophile and a child molester, and those are not the same thing.

Gay people have consensual relationships, just like straight people. People who rape children are something else altogether.

November 14, 2011 11:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about all those gay-themed books recommended for children to read by GLSEN that depict teens having sex with adult males? What is the motive of these books? Where are all the books about teens having sex with females as a sign of finding out “who you are”? Why are those books recommended for reading by the Gay Straight Clubs? Where are all the books about cross-dressers who do so to satisfy a sexual desire?
Is Pedophilia a by-product of porn? Does reading these gay affirming sex books pollute the mind into thinking that it is alright to have sex with an under-aged child?
Children have to be protected.

November 14, 2011 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

quit being a moron, anon. You know fullwell that GLSEn does not promote any such literature. That lie has been very well debunked. I dont know what make someone a pedophile but i have never heard that porn does it. Millions of people look at porn every day, including gay porn, and very few become pedophiles.

November 14, 2011 12:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Like I say, you can redefine the word homosexual to mean anything, if it make hating easier"

well, you're the one dong the redefining

this guy liked sex with his own gender

here's Merriam-Webster:

"of, relating to, or characterized by a tedency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex"

nothing there about age

"Sandusky was attracted to children, there is no evidence at all that he had anything to do with adult males"

actually, there's no evidence at all he had anything to do with female children

for years, every time a married person was caught having a same gender encounter, you guys have jumped to conclude he was gay and was not really attracted to his wife

now, when the PR would work better the other way, well, the situation speaks for itself

the truth is homosexuality is a violation of conventional morality and it's not surprising that those that engage in it also have a tendency to violate conventional morality in other ways

November 14, 2011 4:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

case closed

backlash on its way

this is as big as AIDS and the gay agenda won't recover for decades

November 14, 2011 6:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This doesn't affect gay people at all.

November 14, 2011 8:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

utter denial

it's so sad...

November 15, 2011 12:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"why does staying married make a difference with Sandusky and not with McGreevey ?"

It doesn't. McGreevey was married so he could be a politician while living a double life and have secret sexual relationships with adult men; he did not abuse them. Sandusky is a married pedophile who was protected by a huge football money-making machine for Penn State even though he'd been seen and reported raping other kids since the 1990s. Sandusky did not have sexual relationships with those kids, he sexually abused them.

Sandusky created a program for disadvantaged boys, which was an ingenious way for him to have access to young needy victims. Sandusky didn't need a wife to cover his tracks; he had all those powerful athletic and university leaders keeping him in their club even though they knew about his pedophilia for 20 years. Their crimes of collusion are at least as bad as Sandusky's crimes in many ways. Are you going to claim they're all gay too? JoePa and the rest knew what was going on yet somehow Sandusky was still hanging around those locker rooms and it was OK with all of them, even encouraged by some of them.

Your propaganda goes against what rational people know about pedophiles. Pedophiles don't care so much about the gender of who they abuse. What attracts them is the immaturity of the victim.

Pedophile football coaches like Sandusky don't have much access to female children. If he had, he probably would have abused some of them too. As the protective shroud of the Catholic hierarchy has been pulled back to reveal what goes on inside, we have learned that pedophile priests who do have access to young girls as well as boys have abused children of both genders.

November 15, 2011 8:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Sandusky did not have sexual relationships with those kids, he sexually abused them"

an abusive relationship is still a relationship

the abuse here involves age and consent but, otherwise, his activities mirror what homosexuals do with one another regularly

there is no reason to believe he wasn't a guy with homosexual fantasies who thought he could indulge them without getting caught by victimizing vulnerable males he had access to

November 15, 2011 1:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"there is no reason to believe he wasn't a guy with homosexual fantasies"

The pot calls the kettle black.

November 15, 2011 3:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"his activities mirror what homosexuals do with one another regularly"

No, anon, homoseduals do not nonconsensually rape one another regularly. Your statement is absurd and stupid.

November 15, 2011 5:51 PM  
Anonymous Derrick said...

Another reason why I love living in Maryland; Gov. O´Malley is a good guy!

November 15, 2011 6:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Try to educate yourself, "Anonymous". It might result in your not embarrassing yourself and making a fool of yourself. Education can be so liberating...why not liberate your closed mind?

November 16, 2011 12:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Anonymous" - You said, among other statements of ignorance,
"homosexual: person who is sexually attracted to persons of his own gender
Sandusky: had a sexual attraction to kids of his own gender")

The facts:
"The vast majority of offenders are heterosexual men. Male offenders who abuse young boys maintain adult heterosexual relationships. The habitual molester of boys is rarely attracted to adult males." Roland Summit, M.D. (d)

"29% of child sexual abuse offenders are relatives, 60% are acquaintances, and only 11% are strangers.
-Diana Russell, The Secret Trauma, NY:Basic Books, 1986.

• For the vast majority of child victimizers in State prison, the victim was someone they knew before the crime. 1/3 had committed their crime against their own child, about 1/2 had a relationship with the victim as a friend, acquaintance, or relative other than offspring, about 1 in 7 reported the victim to have been a stranger to them.
-BJS Survey of State Prison Inmates, 1991.

"One study involved 175 male adults who had been convicted in Massachusetts of child sexual assault. They found that none of them were homosexuals; all of them would fit the description of a fixated child molester. They were sexually attracted only to children and not to other adults. 2 Another researcher studied sexually abused children seen in a hospital. Only 2 perpetrators (less than 1% of the total) were homosexuals (i.e. were attracted to same-sex adults)."

"Studies show that there is no connection to homosexuality and child sexual abuse. Dr. Carole Jenny reviewed 352 medical charts, representing all of the sexually abused children seen in the emergency room or child abuse clinic of a Denver children’s hospital during a one-year period (from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992). The molester was a gay or lesbian adult in only 2 of the 269 cases in which an adult molester could be identified, less than 1percent of the cases. (Jenny et al., 1994)."

End of Part I

November 16, 2011 1:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beginning of Part II

"A 1994 study found that “a child’s risk of being molested by his or her relative’s heterosexual partner is 100 times greater than by someone who might be identified as a homosexual. (Carole Jenny et al., Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?; 94 Pediatrics 41; July 1994; study of 269 sexually abused children when an adult offender was identified.)

Here are some more findings from the scientific peer-reviewed journal, "Pediatrics" published in July of 1994. The study was done by Dr. Carole Jenny of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. The subjects were 269 sexually abused children seen at Denver Children's Hospital over the course of one year.

*1 in 219 girls was molested by a lesbian
*1 out of 50 boys by a gay male.
*About 8 in 10 girls were molested by a man who was or had been in a heterosexual relationship with the child's mother or another relative.
*3 out of 4 boys were abused by males in heterosexual relationships with female relatives.

2% of the boys in the study were molested by gay males.

98% of the boys in the study were molested by heterosexuals. Of that number, 75% were molested by heterosexual males KNOWN TO THE VICTIMS in an incestuous scenario.

0.05% of the girls in the study were molested by a lesbian.

99.5% of the girls in the study were molested by heterosexuals. Of that number, 80% were molested by heterosexual males KNOWN TO THE VICTIMS in an incestuous scenario."

"A. Nicholas Groth is a pioneer in the scientific study of sexual offenders against women and children, who has treated over 3000 child molesters over the course of two decades. A former director of the Sex Offender Program at the Connecticut Department of Corrections, Groth is the author of Men Who Rape: Psychology of the Offender, a work widely regarded as a classic textbook on the psychology of sexual violence. In his work, Groth has found that approximately one‑third of all cases of child molestation involve an underage boy and an adult male, a statistic which has been used incessantly by certain conservative activist groups in an effort to prove that homosexuals are disproportionately responsible for acts of child molestation. However, Groth explicitly states that it is a myth that men who molest boys are homosexual."

Please absorb the last statement! We really do worry about your obsessive focus on homosexuality. You are not a healthy person - perhaps a little more effort to practice the precepts of your alleged religion will give you the peace of mind that your behavior denies you.
Benedict XVI

November 16, 2011 1:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm educated just fine

Sandusky was obviously acting on homosexual desires by taking advantage of young, vulnerable members of his own gender that he had authority and access to

he chose males because he was attracted to males

November 16, 2011 1:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sandusky was "obviously" (sic) acting on his PEDOPHILIA desires by taking advantage of young, vulnerable members of his own gender that he had authority and access to

What a burden for you, "Anonymous". To be both the judge and the jury has to be difficult!

According to your "definition",if you happened to be a pedophiliac, you would choose females because you are attracted to females. (at least that is the suspicion)

Educated, "Anonymous"...I think not.

November 16, 2011 1:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the guy was attracted to his own gender (although perhaps not exclusively)

he found a supply of partners to indulge the common promoscuity tendency among a group of vulnerable kids over who he had authority and access to

the simplest explanantion is the most likely

studies have shown that child molestors were often molested as children

studies have shown that a high proportion of gays report being molested as children

two and two add up to a higher proportion of gays who molest children

that's not to say all gays do but it worth noting

November 16, 2011 8:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those would be rumors, not "studies." Look at this analysis of data from an online dating cite: Gay Sex vs. Straight Sex

November 16, 2011 8:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

no, they were studies

I'll see if I can find them online this evening

November 16, 2011 12:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here's some facts from the U.S. National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health about what the TTFer is calling "rumors":

"Pedophiles and child molesters share some characteristics. Most are male, and they can be heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. Some prefer adult sex partners but choose children because they are available and vulnerable. Perpetrators of sexual abuse of children often claim that they themselves were victims of childhood sexual abuse."

November 16, 2011 1:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This article does not address say anything about a"common promoscuity tendency," whatever that is, and does not say that "a high proportion of gays report being molested as children."

Let's see if you can find a study not by Paul Cameron to support these stereotypes.

November 16, 2011 1:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here's where I referred to studies and you called "rumors"

"studies have shown that child molestors were often molested as children

studies have shown that a high proportion of gays report being molested as children"

I found a good source for the first

I'll give you one for the second this evening

I actually found some stuff on the second but there was so much that I'll have to look at them all and
determine which would be the best to post

get excited

November 16, 2011 2:39 PM  
Anonymous impeach him said...

In what has been deemed a historic moment, U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan became the first sitting cabinet secretary to publicly support marriage equality, saying he "absolutely" supports New York's decision to legalize same-sex marriage.

When asked about the June 24 approval of same-sex marriage legislation in New York, Donovan said, ''I was enormously proud to be a New Yorker on the day that it passed."

After praising both Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Donovan admitted, "We've got more work to do in the Obama administration in a second marriage equality.''

Donovan's remarks came at the National Center For Transgender Equality's awards ceremony, where he delivered a keynote speech. Among those who praised Donovan's support was Fred Sainz, vice president of the Human Rights Campaign."

so, they asked to give the keynote address at the Transgender Equality's awards ceremony adn they didn't know he supported a redefinition of marriage to cater to lunatic fringe homosexual advocates?

sounds suspicious

November 16, 2011 2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I actually found some stuff on the second but there was so much that I'll have to look at them all and determine which would be the best to post

get excited...

I'll give you one for the second this evening"

"This evening" has come and gone, and it's the next day now. No "stuff on the second" has been posted but the subject has once again been turned back to Obama. Your twin obsessions do not seem to be working for you, Anon.

At least some good news has come of Sandusky's despicable behavior:

"Penn State case brings other victims forward
By Marisol Bello, USA TODAY

The Penn State scandal is encouraging victims of child sexual abuse to come forward and share experiences they've kept hidden for years, lawyers and advocates for victims say.

"It's a collective empowerment for victims," says Jeff Herman, a Miami attorney who specializes in sexual abuse cases. "Many feel isolated and alone. Then they see all this press and all of a sudden, they see victims standing up and taking on institutions."

He says he has received three to five calls a day from sex abuse survivors since Nov. 5, when Penn State's assistant football coach, Jerry Sandusky, was charged with 40 counts of abusing eight boys over 15 years.

Sandusky has denied the allegations through his attorney and in an interview Monday with NBC.

That interview made victims angrier, Herman says.

"When Sandusky denied the abuse, it's almost like victims can't stay silent," he says. "Victims know what happened to them, and they feel like they owe it to other victims to come forward."

Irwin Zalkin, another attorney who specializes in child sex abuse cases, says his office has seen a spike in phone calls — four to six a day versus the usual two a week.

"It's emotional," he says. "It strikes a nerve. It's difficult for the uninitiated to understand how difficult it is for victims to come forward. They have to muster the courage."

He says victims feel embarrassed, guilty or ashamed.

The lawyers say they have been receiving calls mostly from adults who were abused as children by Catholic priests, Boy Scout leaders and foster home officials. They want to know what recourse is available to them."

November 17, 2011 12:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For "Anonymous"

"By diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, a pedophile is an individual who fantasizes about, is sexually aroused by, or experiences sexual urges toward prepubescent children (generally <13 years) for a period of at least 6 months. Pedophiles are either severely distressed by these sexual urges, experience interpersonal difficulties because of them, or act on them.3 Pedophiles usually come to medical or legal attention by committing an act against a child because most do not find their sexual fantasies distressing or ego-dystonic enough to voluntarily seek treatment.3"

"A substantial amount of research has been performed on what leads one to be attracted to children. Pedophilia, especially the exclusive type, may be best thought of as its own category of sexual orientation, not something that is superimposed on an existing heterosexual or homosexual identity.29,43"
(NOTE: "its own category of sexual orientation"!!)

November 19, 2011 11:29 AM  
Anonymous Jaymax said...

What does the research say?

Paedophiles, child abuse and the internet. Adrian Powell.
"An adult’s heterosexuality or homosexuality is not an indication as to the abuser’s sexual preference of children. As an example, an adult male abuser may prefer to sexually abuse male children aged between six and eight years while maintaining a heterosexual relationship with an adult female."

The Abel and Harlow Child Molestation prevention study (2001)

Adult sexual orientation of men who molest boys.

"While it is a commonly held belief that men who prefer men as adult sex partners molest boys and men who prefer women as adult sex partners molest girls, our study results suggest something different.
The 1,038 men who molested boys reported a range of adult sexual preferences. Contrary to popular belief, only 8 percent reported that they were exclusively homosexual in their adult preferences.

The majority of men who molested boys (51 percent) described themselves as exclusively heterosexual in their adult partner preferences. An additional 19 percent reported they were predominantly heterosexual, while another 9 percent said they were equally heterosexual and homosexual in their adult sex life.

More than 60 percent of pedophiles have other paraphilias. Many are exhibitionists or voyeurs. Of the pedophiles who molest girls, 21 percent also molest boys. Of the pedophiles who molest boys, 53 percent also molest girls."


Archives of Sexual Behavior

"In over 12 years of clinical experience working with child molesters, we have yet to see any example of a regression from an adult homosexual orientation. The child offender who is also attracted to and engaged in adult sexual relationships is heterosexual. It appears, therefore, that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater sexual risk to underage children than does the adult homosexual male."

“The belief that homosexuals are particularly attracted to children is completely unsupported by our data.”

(Groth and Birnbaum, “Adult Sexual Orientation and Attraction to Underage Persons.”)


Behavior Research and Therapy
"Amongst the heterosexuals, the commonest remarks concerning attractive features of the victims, were that the young boys did not have any body hair and that their bodies were soft and smooth."

Marshal, W.L.; Barbaree, H.E.; Butt, Jennifer. “Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences.”


Journal of the American Medical Association

"One study noted that 98% of these male perpetrators self-identified as heterosexual."

Sexual Abuse of Boys. Definition, Prevalence, Correlates, Sequelae, and Management William C. Holmes, MD, MSCE; Gail B. Slap, MD, MS JAMA. 1998;280:1855-1862.

June 30, 2012 12:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home